Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-28T02:30:58.001Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

REPELLENCY OF RAPESEED EXTRACTS TO ADULTS OF TRIBOLIUM CASTANEUM AND TRIBOLIUM CONFUSUM (COLEOPTERA: TENEBRIONIDAE)1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

S. H. Ediz  and
G. R. F. Davis
S. H. Ediz
Affiliation:
Dairy and Food Science Department, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 0W0
G. R. F. Davis
Affiliation:
Research Station, Agriculture Canada, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 0X2
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The chemical composition of plants is one of the major factors influencing their acceptability as food by insects. The interrelationships among these chemicals and between them and insect predators is very complex (Davis 1968). Some are inherently toxic to insects (Singleton and Kratzer 1969); others inhibit feeding (Hsiao and Fraenkel 1968); and still others act both as toxicants and as repellents (Bennett 1965). Apparently, no class of chemical compound is without representation in this regard.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 112 , Issue 9 , 01 September 1980 , pp. 971 - 974
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Appelqvist, L. A. 1972. Chemical constituents of rapeseed. pp. 168–169in Appelqvist, L. A. and Ohlson, R. (Eds.), Rapeseed. Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Bennett, S. E. 1965. Tannic acid as a repellent and toxicant to alfalfa weevil larvae. J. econ. Ent. 58: 372–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, G. R. F. 1968. Phagostimulation and consideration of its role in artificial diets. Bull. ent. Soc. Am. 14: 27–30.Google Scholar
Davis, G. R. F. 1974. Evaluation of the nutritional value of proteins of rape, turnip rape and yellow mustard seed by larvae of the yellow mealworm, Tenebrio molitor L. Archs intern. Physiol. 82: 141–148.Google Scholar
Durkee, A. B. 1971. The nature of tannin in rapeseed (Brassica campestris). Phytochemistry 10: 1583–1587.Google Scholar
Durkee, A. B. and Thivierge, P. A.. 1975. Bound phenolic acids in Brassica and Sinapis oilseeds. J. Food Sci. 40: 820–822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emden, H. F. van. 1972. Aphids as phytochemists. pp. 25–43in Harborne, J. B. (Ed.), Phytochemical Ecology. Academic Press, London and New York.Google Scholar
Hsiao, T. H. and Fraenkel, G.. 1968. The role of secondary plant substances in the food specificity of the Colorado potato beetle. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 61: 693–703.Google Scholar
Kozlawska, H., Sabir, M. A., and Sosulski, F. W.. 1975. Phenolic constituents in rapeseed flour. J. Can. Inst. Food Sci. Technol. 8: 160–163.Google Scholar
Matsuda, K. 1978. Feeding stimulus of flavonoids for various leaf beetles. Appl. Ent. Zool. 13: 228–230.Google Scholar
Pawlowski, S. H., Rigert, P. W., and Krzymanski, J.. 1968. Use of grasshoppers in bioassay of thioglucosides in rapeseed (Brassica napus). Nature 220: 174–175.Google Scholar
Ribérau-Gayon, P. 1972. The phenolic acids and their derivatives. p. 90in Heywood, V. H. (Ed.), Plant Phenolics. Hafner, New York.Google Scholar
Shaver, T. N. and Lukefahr, M. J.. 1969. Effect of flavonoid pigments and gossypol on growth and development of bollworm tobacco budworm and pink bollworm. J. econ. Ent. 62: 643–646.Google Scholar
Singleton, V. L. and Kratzer, F. H.. 1969. Toxicity and related physiological activity of phenolic substances of plant origin. J. agric. Food Chem. 17: 497–511.Google Scholar
Todd, G. W., Getahun, A., and Cress, D. C.. 1971. Resistance in barley to the greenbug, Schizaphis graminum. Toxicity of phenolic and flavonoid compounds and related substances. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 64: 718–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vigneron, J. P. 1978. Substances antiappétantes d'origine naturelle. Ann. Zool. Ecol. anim. 10: 663–694.Google Scholar