Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T19:10:00.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

POPULATION SUPPRESSION BY TRANSMISSION OF INHERITED STERILITY TO PROGENY OF IRRADIATED CABBAGE LOOPERS, TRICHOPLUSIA NI

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

David T. North
Affiliation:
Metabolism and Radiation Research Laboratory, Entomology Research Division, ARS-USDA, Fargo, North Dakota
Gerald G. Holt
Affiliation:
Metabolism and Radiation Research Laboratory, Entomology Research Division, ARS-USDA, Fargo, North Dakota

Abstract

Laboratory population experiments and theoretical calculations are presented that demonstrate effective population suppression by the introduction of partially sterile cabbage loopers into a native population. The use of partially sterile males is advantageous because they are highly competitive with native moths, and since their progeny are sterile provides for population suppression over at least three generations. It is projected, based on experimental results, that 92% control can be obtained for three generations through a single release of partially sterile males. This modification of the sterile-male technique for Lepidoptera could result in control and sizeable savings in cost. Insecticide and other forms of control can be used simultaneously without any effect on the efficiency of the release program.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anonymous, 1959. Tentative method for measuring absorbed gamma radiation dose by Fricke Dosimetry. Amer. Soc. for Test Materials, Suppl. Book of ASTM Standards, Part 9.Google Scholar
Bauer, H. 1967. Die kinetische Organisation der Lepidopteren – Chromosomen. Chromosorma (Berl.) 22, 101125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cogburn, R. R., Tilton, E. L., and Burkholder, W. E.. 1966. Gross effects of gamma radiation on the Indian-meal moth and the Angounomus grain moth. J. econ. Ent. 61: 477483.Google Scholar
Flint, B. M., and Kressin, E.. 1969. Transfer of sperm by irradiated Heliothis virescens and relationship to fecundity. Can. Ent. This issue.Google Scholar
Goldschmidt, R. 1955. Theoretical genetics. University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Ignoffo, C. M. 1963. A successful technique for mass-rearing cabbage loopers on a semi-synthetic diet. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 56: 178182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knipling, E. F. 1968. Concepts and value of eradication or continuous suppression of insect populations. Presented at IAEA/FAO Panel Meeting on the Application of the Sterile Male Technique for the Eradication or Control of Insects, Vienna, Austria, May 1968.Google Scholar
North, D. T. 1967. Radiation-induced male sterility exhibited in the P1, and F1 generation in Lepidoptera. Radiation Res. 31: 615 (Abstract).Google Scholar
North, D. T. 1968. The cytogenetic basis of radioresistance in Lepidopteran species, Trichoplusia ni. Genetics 56: 580 (Abstract).Google Scholar
North, D. T., and Holt, G. G.. 1968 a. Genetic and cytogenetic basis of radiation-induced sterility in the male cabbage looper Trichoplusia ni. In: Intern. Atomic Energy Agency Symposia “Isotopes and Radiation in Entomology,” Vienna, Austria, Nov. 1967, pp. 391403.Google Scholar
North, D. T., and Holt, G. G.. 1968 b. Inherited sterility in progeny of irradiated male cabbage loopers. J. econ. Ent. 61: 928931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proverbs, M. D. 1962. Progress on the use of induced sexual sterility for control of the codling moth, Carpocapsa pomonella L. Proc. ent. Soc. Ont. 92: 511.Google Scholar
Taylor, O. R. Jr. 1967. Relationship of multiple-mating to fertility in Atteva punctella (Lepidoptera: Yponomeutidae). Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 60: 583590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, D. W., and Quintana, V.. 1968. Inherited partial sterility among survivors from irradiation-eradication experiment. J. econ. Ent. 61: 318319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar