Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T16:14:25.787Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A PARTIAL LIFE TABLE FOR THE DOUGLAS-FIR CONE MOTH, BARBARA COLFAXIANA (LEPIDOPTERA: OLETHREUTIDAE)1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

T. Evan Nebeker
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Oregon State University, Corvallis

Abstract

A population of the Douglas-fir cone moth, Barbara colfaxiana (Kft.), was studied on the Buckhead Seed Production Area, Lowell Ranger District, Willamette National Forest, Oregon, during 1971. Factors contributing to the mortality of B. colfaxiana are presented in a partial life table and discussed. The egg – instar I was identified as the critical age interval and resinosis the critical factor.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beaver, R. A. 1966. The development and expression of population tables for the bark beetle Scolytus scolytus (F.). J. Anim. Ecol. 35(1): 2741.Google Scholar
Harcourt, D. G. 1970. Crop life tables as a pest management tool. Can. Ent. 102: 950955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawksworth, F. D. 1965. Life tables for two species of dwarf mistletoe. I. Seed dispersal, interception and movement. For. Sci. 11: 142151.Google Scholar
Hett, J. M. and Louks, O. L.. 1968. Application of life table analyses to tree seedlings in Quetico Provincial Park, Ontario. For. Chron. 44: 2932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedlin, A. F. 1960. On the life history of the Douglas-fir cone moth, Barbara colfaxiana (Kft.) (Lepidoptera: Olethreutidae), and one of its parasites, Glypta evetriae Cush. (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). Can. Ent. 92(8): 826834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isaacson, D. L. 1973. Life table for the cinnabar moth, Tyria jacobaeae (L.) in Oregon. Entomophaga 18(3): 291303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ives, W. G. H. 1964. Problems encountered in the development of life tables for insects. Proc. ent. Soc. Man. 20: 3444.Google Scholar
Keen, F. P. 1958. Cone and seed insects of western forest trees. U.S.D.A. For. Serv., Calif. For. and Range Exp. Sta. Tech. Bull. 1169. 168 pp.Google Scholar
Koerber, T. W. 1960. Insects destructive to the Douglas-fir seed crop in California … a problem analysis. U.S.D.A. For. Serv., Pacific Southwest For. and Range Exp. Sta. Tech. Pap. 45. 36 pp.Google Scholar
Morris, R. F. 1959. Single-factor analysis in population dynamics. Ecology 40: 580588.Google Scholar
Nebeker, T. E. and Overton, S. W.. Systematic variable probability sampling for estimating a Douglas-fir cone population. Proc. Forest Ent. Sect. XV int. Congr. Ent. U.S. Forest Serv. (in press).Google Scholar
Population Dynamics Group. 1964. A key age interval in generation survival. Can. Ent. 96: 145.Google Scholar
Radcliffe, D. N. 1951. Forest seed and plantation insects, with special reference to Barbara colfaxiana Kearf. in Douglas-fir cones. Can. Dept. Agr., For. Biol. Div. Serv., For. Biol. Lab., Victoria, B.C.44 pp.Google Scholar
Radcliffe, D. N. 1952. An appraisal of seed damage by the Douglas-fir cone moth, in British Columbia. For. Chron. 28: 1924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabrosky, C. W. 1951. A revision of the nearctic species of the genus Gaurax (Diptera: Chlorophidae). Am. Midland Nat. 45(2): 407431.Google Scholar
Southwood, T. R. E. 1966. Ecological methods. Methuen, London. 391 pp.Google Scholar
Waters, W. E. 1969. The life table approach to analysis of insect impact. J. For. 67: 300304.Google Scholar