Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:21:41.809Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

NOTES ON BRUCHIDAE OF AMERICA NORTH OF MEXICO WITH A LIST OF WORLD GENERA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

L. J. Bottimer
Affiliation:
Entomology Research Institute, Canada Department of Agriculture, Ottawa

Abstract

This paper contains notes affecting the classification of the Bruchidae of United States and Canada, a list of all species found north of Mexico, and a list of World genera and their type-species. The Mexican Merobruchus vacillator (Sharp) is added to the fauna of this area. Transferred from our list to that of Latin America are: Acanthoscelides californicus (Boheman), Megacerus eugenie new name for Bruchus ramicornis Boheman nee Erichson, and Mimosestes innotatus (Pic.). The following are synonymized: Spermophagus (Zabrotes) semicinctus Horn (1894) with Zabrotes subfasciatus (Boheman 1833); Bruchus subserripes Fall (1910) with Acanthoscelides compressicornis (Schaeffer 1907); Lithraeus electus Bridwell (1952) with Lithraeus elegans (Blanchard 1851); Bruchus alboguttatus Motschoulsky (1874) with Meibomeus musculus (Say 1831); Bruchus bivulneratus Horn (1873) with Bruchus abbreviatus, inadvertently validated by Say = Sennius abbreviatus (Say 1824); Bruchus nigrinus Horn (1873), B. nictitans Motschoulsky (1874), and B. depressus Fall (1912) with Sennius cruentatus (Horn 1873); Bruchus pythonicus Pic (1913) with Stator pygidialis (Schaeffer 1907); and Bruchus biguttatus Fabricius (1801) = Bruchus biguttellus Schoenherr (1833) with Callosobruchus chinensis (Linnaeus 1758). Original spellings of the specific names of two species are revived: Megacerus pygidalis (Motschoulsky) nee pygidialis Pic, and Megacerus discoidus (Say) nec discoideus: authors. Bruchus lividus J. E. LeConte 1824 is placed in our list as an unrecognized species. Thirty-five new combinations are proposed.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

*Agassiz, J. L. R. 1846. Nomenclatoris zoologici Index universalis.Google Scholar
Agassiz, J. L. R. 1848. Nomenclatoris zoologici Index universalis. Jent et Gassmann, Soloduri.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 1942. List of intercepted plant pests, 1941. U.S. Dep. Agric., Washington.Google Scholar
Ashmead, W. H. 1894. Descriptions of new parasitic Hymenoptera. Trans. Am. ent. Soc. 21: 318344.Google Scholar
Back, E. A., and Duckett, A. B.. 1918. Bean and pea weevils. Fmrs' Bull. US. Dep. Agric. 983.Google Scholar
Baudi, F. 1886. Rassegna delle specie delle famiglia dei Milabridi (Bruchidi degli autori) viventi in Europa e regioni finitime. Naturalista sicil. V–VI: 1138.Google Scholar
Bissell, T. L. 1940. Curculionidae, Bruchidae, Lepidoptera, and their parasites, infesting the seed pods of cowpea and various wild plants. J. econ. Ent. 33: 844847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackwelder, R. E. 1946. Checklist of the coleopterous insects of Mexico, Central America, the West Indies, and South America. Part 4. Bull. U.S. natn. Mas. 185: 551763.Google Scholar
Blackwelder, R. E., and Blackwelder, R. M.. 1948. Fifth Supplement to the Leng Catalogue of Coleoptera, north of Mexico. John D. Sherman, Jr., Mount Vernon, N.Y.Google Scholar
Blanchard, C. E. 1851. Fauna Chilena. Insectos. Coleopteros. In Gay, Historia fisica y politica de Chile. Vol. 5, pp. 285563.Google Scholar
Blatchley, W. S. 1930. Notes on the distribution of Coleoptera in Florida with new additions to the known fauna of that state. Can. Ent. 62: 2835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boheman, C. H. 1829. Novae coleopterorum species. Nouv. Mém. Soc. (imp.) Nat. Mosc. 1: 101133.Google Scholar
Boheman, C. H. 1833. (Bruchidae.) In Schoenherr.Google Scholar
Boheman, C. H. 1839. (Bruchidae.) In Schoenherr.Google Scholar
Boheman, C. H. 1858–1859. Coleoptera. Species novas descripsit. In Kongliga Svenska Fregatten Eugenies resa omkring Jorden … zoologi, I, Insecta, pp. 1112 (1858), pp. 113–218 (1859).Google Scholar
Bottimer, L. J. 1931. A vetch bruchid established in the Middle Atlantic States. Insect Pest Surv. Bull. U.S. 11: 347, 435.Google Scholar
Bottimer, L. J. 1935. A new Acanthoscelides from Eastern United States. Ent. News 46: 127129.Google Scholar
Bottimer, L. J. 1956. The identity of Bruchus arenarius Wolcott. Coleopts Bull. 10: 6768.Google Scholar
Bottimer, L. J. 1961. New United States records in Bruchidae with notes on host plants and rearing procedures. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 54: 291298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bottimer, L. J. 1968 a. On the two species of Bruchidius established in North America. Can. Ent. 100: 139145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bottimer, L. J. 1968 b. On the location of types of five species of Bruchidae with notes on early American literature of Acanthoscelides obtectus. Can. Ent. 100: 284289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Böving, A. G. 1927. On the classification of the Mylabridae larvae. Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 29: 133143.Google Scholar
Bradley, L. C. 1946. The family name of Anthribidae, the identity of Amblycerus Thunberg, and the taxonomic position of Eusphyrus LeConte. Bull. Brooklyn ent. Soc. 41: 9699.Google Scholar
Bradley, J. C. 1947. Contributions to our knowledge of the Mylabridae, seu Bruchidae with special reference to the fauna of Northeastern America. Psyche, Camb. 53: 3342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brett, C. H. 1946. Insecticidal properties of the indigobush (Amorpha fruticosa). J. agric. Res. 73: 8196.Google ScholarPubMed
Bridwell, J. C. 1922. (Type of the genus Kytorhinus Fischer.) J. Wash. Acad. Sci. 12: 467.Google Scholar
Bridwell, J. C. 1923 a. The host plant and habits of Acanthoscelides griseolus (Fall). Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 25: 7980.Google Scholar
Bridwell, J. C. 1923 b. Acanthoscelides pullus (Fall). J. Wash. Acad. Sci. 13: 260.Google Scholar
Bridwell, J. C. 1925. Bruchidius ater (Marsham), an unrecorded immigrant from Europe. J. Wash. Acad. Sci. 5: 80.Google Scholar
Bridwell, J. C. 1929 a. The cowpea bruchid under another name — a plea for one kind of entomological specialist. Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 31: 3944.Google Scholar
Bridwell, J. C. 1929 b. Description of a bruchid immigrant into Hawaii breeding in the seeds of Convolvulaceae. Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 31: 112114.Google Scholar
Bridwell, J. C. 1929 c. A preliminary generic arrangement of the palm bruchids and allies with descriptions of new species. Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 31: 141160.Google Scholar
Bridwell, J. C. 1930. (Amblycerus Thunberg.) In Pierce, W. D. 1930. Studies of the North American weevils belonging to the superfamily Platystomidea. Proc. U.S. natn. Mus. 77: 134.Google Scholar
Bridwell, J. C. 1931. Bruchidae infesting seeds of Compositae, with descriptions of new genera and species. Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 33: 3742.Google Scholar
Bridwell, J. C. 1932. The subfamilies of the Bruchidae. Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 34: 100106.Google Scholar
Bridwell, J. C. 1936. (Notes on Bruchidae.) Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 37: 185187.Google Scholar
Bridwell, J. C. 1938 a. Specularius erythrinae, a new bruchid affecting seeds of Erythrina. J. Wash. Acad. Sci. 28: 6976.Google Scholar
Bridwell, J. C. 1938 b. (Synonymies of Acanthoscelides obtectus (Say) and Callosobruchus maculatus (F.)). In Larson and Fisher.Google Scholar
Bridwell, J. C. 1946. The genera of beetles of the family Bruchidae in America north of Mexico. J. Wash. Acad. Sci. 36: 5257.Google Scholar
Bridwell, J. C. 1952 a. A new genus of Bruchidae affecting Hibiscus in Argentina. J. Wash. Acad. Sci. 42: 4950.Google Scholar
Bridwell, J. C. 1952 b. Notes on Bruchidae affecting the Anacardiaceae, including the description of a new genus. J. Wash. Acad. Sci. 42: 124126.Google Scholar
Brimley, C. S. 1938. The insects of North Carolina. N. Carol. Dep. Agric., Raleigh.Google Scholar
Caffrey, D. J. 1943. (Acanthoscelides horni (Pic).) Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 45: 27.Google Scholar
Campbell, R. E. 1920. The broad-bean weevil. U.S. Dep. Agric. Bull. 807.Google Scholar
Casey, T. L. 1884. Contributions to the descriptive and systematic Coleopterology of North America. Part II. Philadelphia.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chittenden, F. H. 1895. On the distribution of certain imported beetles. Insect Life 7: 326332.Google Scholar
Chittenden, F. H. 1912. The cowpea weevil. U.S. Dep. Agric. Bur. Ent. Bull. 96(IV).Google Scholar
Chujo, M. 1937. Some additions and revisions of Bruchidae from the Japanese Empire. Trans. nat. Hist. Soc. Formosa 27: 189200.Google Scholar
Crotch, I. R. 1870. The genera of Coleoptera studied chronologically (1802–21). Trans. ent. Soc. Lond. 1870: 213241.Google Scholar
Cushman, R. A. 1911. Notes on the host plants and parasites of some North American Bruchidae. J. econ. Ent. 4: 489510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Decelle, J. E. 1951. Contribution à I'étude des Bruchidae du Congo belge. Revue Zool. Bot. afr. 45: 172192.Google Scholar
Decelle, J. E. 1966. Bruchus serratus Ol., 1790, espèce-type du genre Caryedon Schönherr, 1823. Revue Zool. Bot. afr. 74: 169173.Google Scholar
Degeer, C. 1775. Mémoirs pour servir à l'histoire des insects. Vol. 5. Stockholm.Google Scholar
Dejean, P. F. M. A. 1821. Catalogue de la collection de Coléoptères de M. le baron Dejean.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dohrn, C. A. 1879. (Bruchus abbreviatus Melsh.) Stettin. ent. Ztg 40: 184189.Google Scholar
Dury, C. 1879. List of the Coleoptera observed in the vicinity of Cincinnati. J. Cincinn. Soc. nat. Hist. 2: 162178.Google Scholar
Erichson, W. F. 1848. Insecten. In Schomburgk, R., Versuch einer Fauna und Flora von Britisch-Guiana. Dritter Theil. pp. 553617. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Fabricius, J. C. 1775. Systema entomologiae, sistens insectorum classes, species, adiectis synonyms, locis, descriptionibus, observationibus. Lipsiae.Google Scholar
Fabricius, J. C. 1781. Species insectorum. Vol. 1. Kilonii.Google Scholar
Fabricius, J. C. 1792. Entomologia systematica. Vol. 1. Hafniae.Google Scholar
Fabricius, J. C. 1798. Supplementum entomologiae systematicae. Hafniae.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fabricius, J. C. 1801. Systema eleutheratorum. Vol. 2. Kiliae.Google Scholar
Fähraeus, O. I. 1839. (Bruchidae.) In Schoenherr.Google Scholar
Fall, H. C. 1901. List of the Coleoptera of Southern California with notes on habits and distribution and descriptions of new species. Occ. Pap. Calif. Acad. Sci. 8: 1282.Google Scholar
Fall, H. C. 1910. Miscellaneous notes and descriptions of North American Coleoptera. Trans. Am. ent. Soc. 36: 89197.Google Scholar
Fall, H. C. 1912. A new Tetropium, two new Bruchidae, with brief notes on other Coleoptera. Ent. News 23: 320323.Google Scholar
Fall, H. C. 1926. A list of the Coleoptera taken in Alaska and adjacent parts of the Yukon Territory in the summer of 1924. Pan-Pacif. Ent. 2: 191208.Google Scholar
Fischer von Waldheim, G. 1809. Sur deux genres nouveaux de Coléoptères. Mém. Soc. (imp.) Nat. Mosc. 2: 293304.Google Scholar
Fischer von Waldheim, G. 1824. Entomographia imperii russici; genera insectorum systematica exposita et analysi iconographica instructa. Vol. 2. Mosquae.Google Scholar
Gemminger, M., and de Harold, E.. 1873. Catalogus Coleopterorum hucusque descriptorum synonymicus et systematicus. Vol. 10. Monachii.Google Scholar
*Geoffrey, E. L. 1785. (New species.) In Fourcroy, A. F., Entomologica parisiensis, sive catalogus insectorum, quae in agro parisiensi reperiuntur … Paris.Google Scholar
Germar, E. F. 1824. Insectorum species novae aut minus cognitatae, descriptionibus illustratae. Vol. 1. Coleoptera. Hendelu et Filii, Halae.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gistel, J. 1848. Naturgeschichte des Thierreichs för höhere Schulen. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Gistel, J. 1856. Die mysterien der europäischen insectenwelt. Kempten.Google Scholar
Glick, P. A. 1939. The distribution of insects, spiders, and mites in the air. U.S. Dep. Agric. Tech. Bull. 673.Google Scholar
Glick, P. A. 1957. Collecting insects by airplane in southern Texas. U.S. Dep. Agric. Tech. Bull. 1158.Google Scholar
Gmelin, J. F. 1790. Linnaeus' Systema Naturae. Ed. 13. Vol. 1.Google Scholar
Goeze, J. A. E. 1777. Entomologische Beyträge zu des Ritter Linne zwälften ausgabe des natursystems. Vol. 1. Leipzig.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
des Gozis, M. 1881. Quelques rectifications synonymiques touchant différents genres et spèces du Coléoptères français Ire partie. Bull. Ent. in Annls Soc. ent. Fr. 1881: CXII–CXIII.Google Scholar
des Gozis, M. 1885. Notes et remarques pour le futur catalogue de la faune Gallo-Rhénane. Revue Ent. 4: 116132.Google Scholar
Gyllenhal, L. 1833. (Bruchidae.) In Schoenherr.Google Scholar
Gyllenhal, L. 1839. (Bruchidae.) In Schoenherr.Google Scholar
Hamilton, J. 1894. Catalogue of the Coleoptera common to North America, Northern Asia and Europe, with distribution and bibliography. 2nd ed. Trans. Am. ent. Soc. 21: 345416.Google Scholar
Hinckley, A. D. 1960. The klu beetle, Mimosestes sallaei (Sharp), in Hawaii. Proc. Hawaii Ent. Soc. 17: 260269.Google Scholar
Horn, G. H. 1873. Revision of the Bruchidae of the United States. Trans. Am. Ent. Soc. 4: 311342.Google Scholar
Horn, G. H. 1875. Synonymical notes and description of new species of North American Coleoptera. Trans. Am. ent. Soc. 5: 126156.Google Scholar
Horn, G. H. 1885 a. Synonymical notes (No. 3.) Entomologica am. 1: 108113.Google Scholar
Horn, G. H. 1885 b. Contributions to the Coleopterology of the United States. Trans. Am. ent. Soc. 12: 128162.Google Scholar
Horn, G. H. 1886. Notes on the “Biologia Central-Americana”. Trans. Am. ent. Soc. 13: vii–xi.Google Scholar
Horn, G. H. 1894. The Coleoptera of Baja California. Proc. Calif. Acad. Sci. (2nd ser.) 4: 302449.Google Scholar
*Hummel, A. D. 1827. Essais entomologiques No. 6. St. Pétersbourg.Google Scholar
Jekel, H. 1855. Insecta Saundersiana: or characters of undescribed insects in the collection of William Wilson Saunders, Esq., F.R.S., F.L.S. &. Part I. Van Voorst, London.Google Scholar
*Johansson, B. 1763. Centuria insectorum rariorum. Amoenitates Academicae 6: 384415.Google Scholar
Johnson, C. D. 1963. A taxonomic revision of the genus Stator. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 56: 860865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, C. D. 1966. Caryedon gonogra (Fabricius) established in Mexico. Pan-Pacif. Ent. 42: 162.Google Scholar
Johnson, C. D. 1968. Notes on the systematics, host plants, and bionomics of the bruchid genera Merobruchus and Stator. Pan-Pacif. Ent. 43: 264271.Google Scholar
Kingsolver, J. M. 1965. On the genus Abutiloneus Bridwell. Coleopts Bull. 19: 125128.Google Scholar
Kingsolver, J. M. 1967. On the genus Rhipibruchus Bridwell with descriptions of a new species and a closely related genus. Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 69: 318327.Google Scholar
Kraatz, G. 1868. Ueber einige europaische Bruchus-Arten. Berl. ent. Z. 12: 215218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Küster, H. C. 1850. Die Käfer Europa's, Heft 19, Nos. 1–100. Bauer u. Raspe, Nürnberg.Google Scholar
Lacordaire, J. T. 1845. Monographie des Coléoptères subpentameres de la famille des phytophages. Mém. Soc. r. Sci. Liège 3: 1740.Google Scholar
Lacordaire, J. T. 1857. Genera des Coléoptères … Vol. 4. Paris.Google Scholar
Larson, A. O., and Fisher, C. K.. 1938. The bean weevil and the southern cowpea weevil in California. U.S. Dep. Agric. Tech. Bull. 593.Google Scholar
Latreille, P A. 1810. Considérations générales sur l'ordre nature1 des crustacés, des arachnides et des insectes. C. F. Schoell, Paris.Google Scholar
LeConte, J. E. 1824. Descriptions of some new species of North American insects. Ann. Lyceum nut. Hist. N.Y. 1: 169173.Google Scholar
LeConte, J. L. 1857. Report upon insects collected on the survey. Rept. of Expl. and Surv. Miss. to Pac. (Preprint.) Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
LeConte, J. L. 1858. Descriptions of new species of Coleoptera, chiefly collected by the United States and Mexican Boundary Commission, under Major W. H. Emory, U.S.A. Proc. nat. Sci. Philad. 1858: 5989.Google Scholar
LeConte, J. L. 1859. The complete writings of Thomas Say on the entomology of North America. Vol. II. Baillière Bros., New York.Google Scholar
Leech, H. B. 1954. (Stator limbatus (Horn).) Pan-Pacif. Ent. 30: 8586.Google Scholar
Leng, C. W. 1920. Catalogue of Coleoptera of America, north of Mexico. John D. Sherman, Jr., Mount Vernon, N.Y.Google Scholar
Lepesme, P. 1941. In Vayssière et Lepesme.Google Scholar
Lepesme, P. 1944. Les Coléoptères des denrées alimentaires et des produits industriels entreposés. Encycl. ent. 22: 1335.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C. 1758. Systema naturae. Ed. 10. Vol. 1. Holmiae.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C. 1761. Fauna Svecica II. Stockholmiae.Google Scholar
*Linnaeus, C. 1763. Centuria insectorum rariorum. Resp. Boas Johansson 23 Jun. 1763. Upsaliae. Amoenitates Academicae 6: 384415.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C. 1767. Systema naturae. Ed. 12. Vol. 1. Holmiae.Google Scholar
Lucas, M. H. 1858. (Spermophagus semifasciatus.) Bull. Ent. in Annls Soc. ent. Fr. 1858: XXVIII.Google Scholar
Lukianovitsh, F. K., et Ter-Minassian, M. E.. 1957. Bruchidae. Akad. Nauk SSSR Zool. inst. Fauna SSSR, Vol. 24(1).Google Scholar
Marseul, S. A. 1876. Nouvelles et faits divers No 10. 1875. Abeille, Paris XIV: XXXVII–XL.Google Scholar
Marsham, T. 1802. Entomologia Britannica, sistens insecta Britanniae indigena. Tomus 1. Coleoptera. London.Google Scholar
Melsheimer, F. E. 1853. Catalogue of the described Coleoptera of the United States. Smithsonian Institution, Washington.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melsheimer, F. V. 1806. A catalogue of insects of Pennsylvania. Hanover, Pa.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moreno, G., and Bibby, F. F.. 1943. Ynsectos del algodon y otros Malvaceae en las regiones de Matamoras, Tams, y del Valle Bajo del Rio Bravo, Texas-E. U. A. Fitofilo 2: 20110.Google Scholar
Motschoulsky, V. 1854. Voyages. Lettre de M. de Motschulsky à M. Ménétriés. Étud. Ent. 2: 115.Google Scholar
Motschoulsky, V. 1855. Voyages. Lettre de M. de Motschulsky à M. Ménétriés. NO. 2. Étud. Ent. 4: 825.Google Scholar
Motschoulsky, V. 1856. Voyages. Lettres de M. de Motschulsky à M. Ménétriés. No. 3. Étud. Ent. 5: 320.Google Scholar
Motschoulsky, V. 1874. Énumération des nouvelles espèces de coléoptères rappertés de ses voyages. Bull. Soc. Nat. Mosc. 46: 203252.Google Scholar
Muesebeck, C. F. W., Krombein, K. V., and Townes, H. K.. 1951. Hymenoptera of America north of Mexico. Synoptic catalog. Agriculture Monogr. 2. U.S. Dep. Agric.Google Scholar
*Olivier, A. G. 1790. Encyclopédie méthodique. Histoire Naturelle. Insectes. Vol. 5. Pt. I.Google Scholar
Olivier, A. G. 1795. Entomologie, ou histoire naturelle des insectes… Coléoptères IV, 79. Lanneau, Paris.Google Scholar
Paddock, F. B., and Reinhard, H. J.. 1919. The cowpea weevil. Tex. agric. Exp. Stn Bull. 256.Google Scholar
Philippi, F. H. E. 1859. Algunas nuevas de Coleopteros de la provincia de Valdivia. An. Univ. Chile 16: 656678.Google Scholar
Pic, M. 1902. Coleoptères présumes nouveaux de la Rhodesia. Revue Ent. 21: 47.Google Scholar
Pic, M. 1903. Coleoptères de l'Afrique australe. Revue Ent. 22: 165171.Google Scholar
Pic, M. 1904 a. Diagnoses de Coleoptères Palearctiques et exotiques. Échange 233: 3336.Google Scholar
Pic, M. 1904 b. Sur divers Lariidae ou Bruchidae et Urodon anciens et nouveaux. Èchange 233: 3940.Google Scholar
Pic, M. 1910. Coleoptères exotiques nouveaux ou peu connus. Échange 312: 9495.Google Scholar
Pic, M. 1911. Coleoptères exotiques nouveaux peu connus. Échange 317: 132134.Google Scholar
Pic, M. 1912. Renseignements généraux sur les Bruchidae. Échange 336: 9193.Google Scholar
Pic, M. 1913 a. Bruchidae. Coleoptm Cat. 55: 174. W. Junk, Berlin.Google Scholar
Pic, M. 1913 b. Coleoptères exotiques in partie nouveaux. Échange 338: 106110.Google Scholar
Pic, M. 1917. Descriptions abrégées diverses. Meélang. exot.-ent. 26: 224.Google Scholar
Pic, M. 1927. Nouveaux Coleoptères exotiques. Ent. Mitt. 16: 246255.Google Scholar
Pic, M. 1930. Nouveaux diverses. Meélang. exor.-ent. 55: 136Google Scholar
Pic, M. 1932. Nouveautes diverses. Mélang. exot.-ent. 59: 1036.Google Scholar
Pic, M. 1938. Nouveautes diverses, mutations. Mélang. exot.-ent. 70: 136.Google Scholar
Pic, M. 1943. Note rectificative. Revue fr. Ent. 9: 148.Google Scholar
Pic, M. 1951. Nouveaux Bruchides de l'Afrique australe. Ann. Transv. Mus. 21: 427428.Google Scholar
Pic, M. 1953. Coleoptères du globe. Èchange 531: 24.Google Scholar
Pierce, W. D. 1915. Descriptions of some weevils reared from cotton in Peru. U.S. Dep. Agric. Rep. 102.Google Scholar
Pierce, W. D. 1930. Notes on the canafistula weevils of the genus Phelomerus Pic. Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 32: 3748.Google Scholar
Prevett, P. F. 1966. A new genus and species of Pachymerinae from South America. Proc. R. ent. Soc. Lond. (B), 35: 8183.Google Scholar
Riley, C. V. 1871. Third annual report on the noxious, beneficial and other insects, of the state of Missouri. Horace Wilcox, Jefferson City, Mo.Google Scholar
Rosenhauer, W. G. 1856. Die Thiere Andalusiens nach den Resultaten einer Reise zusammengestellt, nebst den Beschreibungen von 249 neuen oder bis jetzt noch unbeschriebenen Gattungen und Arten. Erlangen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Say, T. 1824. Descriptions of coleopterous insects collected in the late expedition to the Rocky Mountains, performed by order of Mr. Calhoun, Secretary of War, under the command of Major Long. J. Acad. nat. Sci. Philad. 3: 298331.Google Scholar
Say, T. 1831. Descriptions of North American Curculionides and an arrangement of some of our known species agreeably to the method of Schoenherr. New Harmony, Ind.Google Scholar
Schaeffer, C. 1904. New genera and species of Coleoptera. Jl N.Y. ent. Soc. 12: 197236.Google Scholar
Schaeffer, C. 1907. New Bruchidae with notes on known species and list of species known to occur at Brownsville, Texas, and in the Huachuca Mountains, Arizona. Sci. Bull. Mus. Brooklyn Inst. Arts Sci. 1: 291306.Google Scholar
Schaeffer, C. 1909. New Coleoptera chiefly from Arizona. Sci. Bull. Mus. Brooklyn Inst. Arts Sci. 1: 375386.Google Scholar
Schilsky, J. 1904. Synonymische bemerkungen zur gattung Bruchus L. Dt. ent. Z. 1904: 455456.Google Scholar
Schilsky, J. 1905. Bruchidae. In Küster und Kraatz, Die Käfer Europa's, pp. 41a-f, 41A-MM; Nos. 1–100. Bauer und Raspe, Nürnberg.Google Scholar
Schoenherr, C. J. 1823. Curculionides. Isis Oken. Zweiter Band. Heft X. Cols. 1132–1146.Google Scholar
Schoenherr, C. J. 1833. Genera et species curculionidum, cum synonymia hujus familae. Vol. l(1). Paris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoenherr, C. J. 1839. Genera et species curculionidum, cum synonymia hujus familae. Vol. V(1). Paris, Lipsiae.Google Scholar
Schwarz, E. A. 1878. The Coleoptera of Florida. Proc. Am. phil. Soc. 17: 353472.Google Scholar
Seidlitz, G. 1891. Fauna Baltica. Die Kaefer der deutschen Ostseeprovinzen Russlands. Königsberg.Google Scholar
Sharp, D. 1885. Bruchidae. Biol. Centrali-Americana. Coleoptera, Vol. 5.Google Scholar
Sharp, D. 1886. On the Bruchidae of Japan. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. (5th ser.) 17: 3438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharp, D. 1914. Insecta. Zool. Rec. 50: 1470.Google Scholar
Southgate, B. J. 1958. Systematic notes on species of Callosobruchus of economic importance. Bull. ent. Res. 49: 591599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southgate, B. J. 1963. The true identity of the broom bruchid and synoptic notes on other species of Bruchidius. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 56: 795798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southgate, B. J. 1965. Pulse bruchids of Africa. Proc. XIIth int. Congr. Ent. (London). p. 642.Google Scholar
Southgate, B. J., Howe, R. W., and Brett, G. A.. 1957. The specific status of Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) and Callosobruchus analis (F.). Bull. ent. Res. 48: 7989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sturm, J. 1826. Catalog meiner Insecten – Sammlung, Erster Theil. Käfer. Nürnberg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Sturm, J. 1843. Catalog der Kaefer-Sammlung von Jacob Sturm. Nürnberg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suffrian, E. 1870. Verzeichniss der von Dr. Gundlach auf der Insel Cuba gesammelten Rüsselkafer. Arch. Naturgesch. 36: 150234.Google Scholar
Teran, A. L. 1964. Algunas novedades en el genero “Eubaptus” Lac. Acta Zool. lilloana 20: 177186.Google Scholar
Teran, A. L. 1967. Consideraciones sobre Eubaptus palliatus Lac., Bruchus scapularis Pic y descripcion de los estados preimaginales de Eubaptus rufithorax (Pic). Acta Zool. lilloana 21: 7189.Google Scholar
*Thunberg, C. P. 1791. Museum naturalium Academiae Upsaliensis Dissert Appendix Pars 1. Resp. Lundelius. 1791: 111122.Google Scholar
Thunberg, C. P. 1805. (Four new genera.) Götting. gelehrte Anz. 1805: 281282.Google Scholar
Thunberg, C. P. 1815. De Coleopteris rostratis. Nova Acta R. Soc. Scient. upsal. 7.Google Scholar
Thunberg, C. P. 1816. Fyra nya arter af Bruchus slägtet. K. svenska Vetensk-Akad. Handl. 1816: 4347.Google Scholar
Townsend, C. H. T. 1903. Contributions to a knowledge of the coleopterous fauna of the Lower Rio Grande Valley in Texas and Tamaulipas, with biological notes and special reference to geographical distribution. Trans. Tex. Acad. Sci. 1902, 5: 49101.Google Scholar
Trelease, S. F., and Trelease, H. M.. 1937. Toxicity to insects and mammals of foods containing selenium. Am. J. Bot. 24: 448451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, B. L. 1960. The legumes of Texas. Univ. of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
Ulke, H. 1902. A list of the beetles of the District of Columbia. Proc. U.S. natn. Mus. 25: 157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vayssière, P., et Lepesme, P.. 1941. Sur quelques Bruchides nuisibles. Revue fr. Ent. 8: 198202.Google Scholar
Wade, O. 1919. The four-spotted cowpea weevil (Bruchus quadrimaculatus, Fabricius). Okla agric. Exp. Stn Bull. 129.Google Scholar
Werner, F. G. 1958. Some notes on Boheman's Anthribidae from “California”. Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 60: 213216.Google Scholar
Wheeler, W. H., Hunt, J., and Reagan, E. P.. 1950. List of intercepted plant pests, 1948. U.S. Dep. Agric., Washington.Google Scholar
White, B. E. 1941. A new species of Bruchus with notes on Bruchus major Fall and julianus Horn. Pan-Pacif. Ent. 17: 189190.Google Scholar
Wolcott, A. B. 1912. Two new species of Coleoptera from Illinois. Can. Ent. 44: 161163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolcott, G. N. 1936. Insectae Borinquenses. A revised annotated checklist of the insects of Puerto Rico. J. Agric. Univ. P. Rico 20: 1627.Google Scholar
Yip, J. B. 1936. Insect damage to seeds of Cracca virginiana L. J. econ. Ent. 29: 622629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zacher, F. 1930. Untersuchungen zur morphologie und biologie der sammenkäfer. Arb. biol. BundAnst. Land- u. Forstw. 18: 233384.Google Scholar
Zacher, F. 1952. Die Nährpflanzen der samenkäfer. Z. angew. Ent. 33: 460480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar