Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-03T19:17:11.187Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE NEARCTIC SPECIES OF HOLOTELEIA KIEFFER (HYMENOPTERA: SCELIONIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Lubomir Masner
Lubomir Masner
Affiliation:
Biological Resources Division, Centre for Land and Biological Resources Research, Agriculture Canada, Research Branch, Central Experimental Farm, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0C6
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Nearctic species of the genus Holoteleia are revised. Two named species are redescribed and five new species are described: H. armigera from Florida; H. coriacea, H. laticeps, and H. polita from eastern Canada and the United States; and H. elegans, widespread east of the Rocky Mountains. A diagnosis of Holoteleia and a key to the Nearctic species are given. Potential impact of environmental degradation on the frequency of Holoteleia species in North America is discussed.

Résumé

Les espèces néarctiques du genre Holoteleia ont fait l’objet d’une révision. Deux espèces connues sont décrites de nouveau et cinq nouvelles espèces sont décrites : H. armigera de Floride, H. coriacea, H. laticeps et H. polita de l’est du Canada et des États-Unis, et H. elegans, très répandue à l’est des Rocheuses. On trouvera ici la diagnose du genre Holoteleia, ainsi qu’une clé d’identification des espèces néarctiques. L’influence que peut avoir la détérioration de l’environnement sur la fréquence des espèces d’Holoteleia en Amérique du Nord est examinée.

[Traduit par la Rédaction]

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 126 , Issue 1 , February 1994 , pp. 75 - 102
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Field, S.A., and Austin, A.D.. 1994. Morphology and mechanics of the ovipositor system of Scelio Latreille (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae) and related genera. International Journal of Insect Morphology and Embryology. In press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrington, W.H. 1899. Six new Ottawa Proctotrypidae. The Canadian Entomologist 31: 77–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, N.F. 1992. Catalog of World Species of Proctotrupoidea, Exclusive of Platygastridae (Hymenoptera). Memoirs of the American Entomological Institute 51: 825 pp.Google Scholar
Kieffer, J.J. 1908. Révision des Scelionidae (Hyménoptères). Annals de la Societé Scientifique de Bruxelles 32: 110–250, 1 pl.Google Scholar
Kieffer, J.J. 1913. Proctotrypidae (3e partie). In André, E., Species des Hyménoptères d'Europe et d'Algerie… Vol. 11: 161–304. Paris.Google Scholar
Kieffer, J.J. 1926. Scelionidae. Das Tierreich 48: 885 pp.Google Scholar
Masner, L. 1956. First preliminary report on the occurrence of genera of the group Proctotrupoidea (Hym.) in CSR. (First part — family Scelionidae). Acta Faunistica Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae 1: 99–126.Google Scholar
Masner, L. 1965. The types of Proctotrupoidea (Hymenoptera) in the Charles T. Brues collection at the Museum of Comparative Zoology. Psyche 72: 295–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masner, L. 1976. Revisionary notes and keys to world genera of Scelionidae (Hymenoptera: Proctotrupoidea). Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada 97: 87 pp.Google Scholar
Masner, L. 1980 a. Key to genera of Scelionidae of the Holarctic region, with descriptions of new genera and species (Hymenoptera: Proctotrupoidea). Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada 113: 54 pp.Google Scholar
Masner, L. 1980 b. A revision of the Nearctic species of Calotelea Westwood (Hymenoptera, Proctotrupoidea, Scelionidae). The Canadian Entomologist 122: 397–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masner, L. 1991. The Nearctic species of Duta Nixon (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae), egg parasitoids of ground crickets (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). The Canadian Entomologist 123: 777–793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melander, A.L., and Brues, C.T.. 1903. Guests and parasites of the burrowing bee Halictus. Biological Bulletin 5: 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muesebeck, C.F.W. 1979. Superfamily Proctotrupoidea. pp. 1121–1186in Krombein, K.V. et al. , (Eds.), Catalog of Hymenoptera in North America North of Mexico. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Muesebeck, C.F.W., and Masner, L.. 1967. Superfamily Proctotrupoidea. pp. 285–305in Krombein, K.V., and Burks, B.D. (Eds.), Hymenoptera of America North of Mexico. Synoptic Catalog Second Supplement. Agriculture Monograph 2.Google Scholar
Muesebeck, C.F.W., and Walkley, L.M.. 1951. Superfamily Proctotrupoidea. pp. 655–718in Muesebeck, C.F.W. et al. , (Eds.), Hymenoptera of America North of Mexico. Synoptic Catalog. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Monograph 2.Google Scholar
Nixon, G.E.J. 1933. A further contribution to the study of South African Scelionidae (Insecta, Hymenoptera, Proctotrupoidea). Annals and Magazines of Natural History ser. 10, 12: 288–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarazin, M.J. 1986. Primary types of Ceraphronoidea, Evanioidea, Proctotrupoidea and Trigonaloidea (Hymenoptera) in the Canadian National Collection. The Canadian Entomologist 118: 957–989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Severin, H.C. 1935. The common black field cricket a serious pest in South Dakota. Bulletin of South Dakota Agriculture Experimental Station 295: 51 pp.Google Scholar