Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T16:00:15.491Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mortality of Codling Moth Eggs and Young Larvae in an Integrated Control Orchard1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

C. R. MacLellan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Proof of insect predation by small arthropods is difficult to obtain under orchard conditions. The act of predation is seldom observed and unless some characteristic sign is left by the predator there is little chance of recognizing the species responsible. Many special techniques to study predation have been designed, but because they all have limitations it is still necessary to present circumstantial evidence in most predator-prey field studies. Perhaps the most common technique used is the limb or tree cage whereby both prey and suspected predators are released within the cage and observations made at regular intervals. This cage method, as well as the insecticidal check method of DeBach (1946) as modified by Lord (1956), the precipitin test (MacLellan (1954), West (1950)), the use of radioisotopes (Ahmed et al., (1954), Baldwin et al., (1955), MacLellan (1958b)), and others were considered for use in the present studies but were rejected because of particular limitations.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 94 , Issue 6 , June 1962 , pp. 655 - 666
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1962

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahmed, M. K., Newsom, L. D., Emerson, R. B., and Rousel, J. S.. 1954. The effect of systox on some common predators of the cotton aphid. J. Econ. Ent. 47: 445–449.Google Scholar
Baldwin, W. F., James, H. G., and Welch, H. E.. 1955. A study of predators of mosquito larvae and pupae with a radioactive tracer. Canadian Ent. 87: 350–356.Google Scholar
Coutin, R. 1960. Le carpocapse des pommes et des poires (Laspeyresia pomonella L.). Assoc. de Coord. Tech. Agric. pp. 48.Google Scholar
DeBach, P. 1946. An insecticidal check method for measuring the efficacy of entomophagous insects. J. Econ. Ent. 39: 695–697.Google Scholar
Garlick, W. G. 1956?. Faunal studies in an apple orchard not treated with insecticides. (Unpublished and undated manuscript).Google Scholar
Groves, J. R. 1953. A study of some Tortricoidea on fruit trees with special reference to the codling moth, Cydia (Ernarmonia) pomonella (L.). Ph.D. Thesis, University of London, England.Google Scholar
Jaynes, H. A., and Marucci, P. E.. 1947. Effect of artificial control practices on the parasites and predators of the codling moth. J. Econ. Ent. 40: 9–25.Google Scholar
Lord, F. T. 1949. The influence of spray programs on the fauna of apple orchards in Nova Scotia. III. Mites and their predators. Canadian Ent. 81: 202–230.Google Scholar
Lord, F. T. 1956. The influence of spray programs on the fauna of apple orchards in Nova Scotia. IX. Studies on means of altering predator populations. Canadian Ent. 88: 129–137.Google Scholar
MacLellan, C. R. 1954. The use of the precipitin test in evaluating codling moth predators. M.A. Thesis, Queen's University, Kingston.Google Scholar
MacLellan, C. R. 1958a. Role of woodpeckers in control of the codling moth in Nova Scotia. Canadian Ent. 90: 18–22.Google Scholar
MacLellan, C. R. 1958b. Uses of radioactive materials in entomology: A review. Proc. Agric. Pesticide and Technical Soc. (AIC) 1958: 6–19.Google Scholar
Stultz, H. T. 1946. Bionomics of the codling moth, Carpocapsa pomonella L., in the Annapolis Valley, Nova Scotia. M.Sc. Thesis. McGill University, Montreal.Google Scholar
Summerland, S. A., and Steiner, L. F.. 1943. Codling moth oviposition and fate of eggs. J. Econ. Ent. 36: 72–75.Google Scholar
West, A. S. 1950. The precipitin test as an entomological tool. Canadian Ent. 82: 241–244.Google Scholar
Wildbolz, T. 1958. Über die Orientierung des Apfelwicklers bei der Eiablage. Mitt. Schweiz. Ent. Ges. 31: 25–34.Google Scholar