Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:11:39.608Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

MONITORING POPULATION LEVELS OF EIGHT SPECIES OF NOCTUIDS WITH SEX-ATTRACTANT TRAPS IN SOUTHERN ALBERTA, 1978–1983: SPECIFICITY OF ATTRACTANTS AND EFFECT OF TARGET SPECIES ABUNDANCE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

J.R. Byers  and
D.L. Struble
J.R. Byers
Affiliation:
Agriculture Canada Research Station, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada T1J 4B1
D.L. Struble
Affiliation:
Agriculture Canada Research Station, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada T1J 4B1
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The abundances of eight species of cutworm and armyworm moths were monitored with sex-attractant traps at 81 locations in a 13 000-km2 area of southern Alberta from 1978 to 1983. The life history and economic status of each species is summarized and the monitoring methodology is described. The attractants for redbacked cutworm (Euxoa ochrogaster), darksided cutworm (Euxoa messoria), pale western cutworm (Agrotis orthogonia), and army cutworm (Euxoa auxiliaris) were highly specific and > 99% of the moths caught were of the target species. Specificity of the attractants for clover cutworm (Discestra trifolii) and Leucania commoides was also high, averaging 98.3 and 96.6%, respectively, over 6 years. The attractants for variegated cutworm (Peridroma soucia) and bertha armyworm (Mamestra configurata) were less specific but the proportion of target species exceeded 80% in those years when either species was relatively abundant. For those species that were monitored over a wide range of population levels, the apparent specificity of the attractant varied directly with the number of target species moths caught. The use of efficient attractants in combination with high-capacity nonsaturating traps is clearly of advantage in enhancing specificity.

Résumé

L’abondance de huit espèces de ver-gris et de légionnaires adultes a été suivie de près au moyen de pièges sexuels à 81 endroits dans une zone de 13 000 km2 du sud de l’Alberta, de 1978 à 1983. Les auteurs résument le cycle biologique et la situation économique de chaque espèce et décrivent la méthodologie utilisée. Les attractifs sexuels pour le ver-gris à dos rouge (Euxoa ochrogaster), le ver-gris moissonneur (Euxoa messoria), le ver-gris orthogonal (Agrotis orthogonia) et la légionnaire grise (Euxoa auxiliaris) sont très spécifiques et plus de 99% des adultes comptent parmi les espèces visées. La spécificité des attractifs pour le ver-gris du trèfle (Discestra trifolii) et Leucania commoides est également élevée, atteignant en moyenne 98,3 et 96,9% respectivement pendant 6 ans. Pour le ver-gris panaché (Peridroma saucia) et la légionnaire bertha (Mamestra configurata), les attractifs sont moins spécifiques, mais la proportion d’espèces visées dépasse 80% pendant les années où l’une ou l’autre des espèces est relativement abondante. Pour les espèces étudiées sur un large éventail de densités de population, la spécificité apparente de l’attractif varie directement en fonction du nombre de papillons des espèces cibles capturés. L’utilisation d’attractifs efficients avec des pièges non saturants de forte capacité est définitivement avantageuse pour améliorer la spécificité.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 119 , Issue 6 , June 1987 , pp. 541 - 556
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ayre, G.L. 1985. Cold tolerance of Pseudaletia unipuncta and Peridroma saucia (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Can. Ent. 117: 1055–1060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayre, G.L., Turnock, W.J., and Struble, D.L.. 1982 a. Spatial and temporal variability in sex attractant trap catches of Scotogramma trifolii (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in relation to its biology in Manitoba. Can. Ent. 114: 145–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayre, G.L., Turnock, W.J., and Struble, D.L.. 1982 b. Spatial and temporal variability in sex attractant trap catches of Euxoa messoria and E. ochrogaster (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in relation to their biology in Manitoba. Can. Ent. 114: 993–1001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayre, G.L., Turnock, W.J., and Struble, D.L.. 1983. Spatial and temporal variability in sex attractant trap catches of Leucania commoides and Peridroma saucia (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in relation to their biology in Manitoba. Can. Ent. 115: 1573–1582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beirne, B.P. 1971. Pest insects of annual crop plants in Canada. I. Lepidoptera, II. Diptera, III. Coleop-tera. Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 78. 128 pp.Google Scholar
Burton, R.L., Starks, K.J., and Peters, D.C.. 1980. The army cutworm. Oklahoma State Univ., Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. B-749. 35 pp.Google Scholar
Byers, J.R., Struble, D.L., and Schaalje, G.B.. 1986. Monitoring population levels of eight species of noctuids with sex-attractant traps in southern Alberta, 1978–1983: Consistency of trap catches and precision of population estimates. Can. Ent. 119: 000–000.Google Scholar
Cheng, H.H., and Struble, D.L.. 1982. Field evaluation of blacklight and sex attractant traps for monitoring seasonal distribution of the darksided cutworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Ontario. Can. Ent. 114: 1121–1125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daterman, G.E. 1982. Monitoring insects with pheromones: trapping objectives and bait formulations. pp. 195–212in Kydonieus, A.F., and Beroza, M. (Eds.), Insect Suppression with Controlled Release Pheromone Systems, Vol. 1. CRC Press.Google Scholar
Godfrey, G.L. 1972. A review and reclassification of larvae of the subfamily Hadeninae (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) of America, north of Mexico. USDA, ARS, Tech. Bull. 1450. 265 pp.Google Scholar
Houx, N.W.H., Voerman, S., and Jongen, W.M.F.. 1974. Purification and analysis of synthetic insect attractants by liquid chromatography on a silver-loaded resin. J. Chromatogr. 96: 25–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, L.A. 1971. The pale western cutworm, Agrotis orthogonia Morrison (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): a review of research. Quaest. ent. 7: 411–436.Google Scholar
King, K.M., and Atkinson, N.J.. 1926. The relation of the red-backed cutworm to diversified agriculture in western Canada. Sci. Agric. 7: 86–91.Google Scholar
Klassen, W., Ridgway, R.L., and Inscoe, M.. 1982. Chemical attractants in integrated pest management programs. pp. 13–130in Kydonieus, A.F., and Beroza, M. (Eds.), Insect Suppression with Controlled Release Pheromone Systems, Vol. 1. CRC Press.Google Scholar
McDonough, L.M., and Butler, L.I.. 1983. Insect sex pheromones: determination of half-lives from formulations by collection of emitted vapor. J. Chem. Ecol. 9: 1491–1502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rings, R.W., Johnson, B.A., and Arnold, F.J.. 1975. An annotated bibliography of the darksided cutworm, Euxoa messoria (Harris). Ohio Agric. Res. Dev. Center, Res. Circ. 205. 50 pp.Google Scholar
Rings, R.W., Johnson, B.A., and Arnold, F.J.. 1976. A worldwide, annotated bibliography of the variegated cutworm, Peridroma saucia Hubner. Ohio Agric. Res. Dev. Center, Res. Circ. 219. 126 pp.Google Scholar
Steck, W.F., Bailey, B.K., and Underhill, E.W.. 1984. Effects of some semiochemicals on the sex pheromone of the bertha armyworm, Mamestra configurata (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Can. Ent. 116: 619–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Struble, D.L. 1981 a. A four-component pheromone blend for optimum attraction of redbacked cutworm males, Euxoa ochrogaster (Guenee). J. Chem. Ecol. 7: 615–625.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Struble, D.L. 1981 b. Modification of the attractant blend for adult males of the army cutworm, Euxoa auxiliaris (Grote), and the development of an alternate 3-component attractant blend for this species. Environ. Ent. 10: 167–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Struble, D.L. 1983. Pheromone traps for monitoring moth (Lepidoptera) abundances: evaluation of cone-orifice and omni-directional designs. Can. Ent. 115: 59–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Struble, D.L., Ayre, G.L., and Byers, J.R.. 1984. Minor sex-pheromone components of Mamestra configurata (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and improved blends for attraction of male moths. Can. Ent. 116: 103–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Struble, D.L., and Byers, J.R.. 1987. Identification of sex pheromone components of the darksided cutworm, Euxoa messoria, and modification of the sex attractant blend for adult males. J. Chem. Ecol. 13. In press.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Struble, D.L., and Swailes, G.E.. 1975. A sex attractant for the clover cutworm, Scotogramma trifolii (Rottenberg), a mixture of Z–11–hexadacen–1–ol acetate and Z–11–hexadecen–1–ol. Environ. Ent. 4: 632–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Struble, D.L., and Swailes, G.E.. 1978 a. A sex attractant for adult males of the pale western cutworm, Agrotis orthogonia (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Can. Ent. 110: 769–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Struble, D.L., and Swailes, G.E.. 1978 b. Sex attractant for adult males of the redbacked cutworm, Euxoa ochrogaster. Environ. Ent. 7: 384–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Struble, D.L., Swailes, G.E., and Ayre, G.L.. 1977. A sex attractant for males of the darksided cutworm, Euxoa messoria (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Can. Ent. 109: 975–980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Struble, D.L., Swailes, G.E., Steck, W.F., Underhill, E.W., and Chisholm, M.D.. 1976. A sex attractant for the adult males of variegated cutworm, Peridroma saucia. Environ. Ent. 5: 988–990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Struble, D.L., Swailes, G.E., Steck, W.F., Underhill, E.W., and Chisholm, M.D.. 1977. A sex attractant for Leucania commoides: a mixture of Z–9–tetradecen–1–y1 acetate, Z–11–hexadecen–1–y1 acetate and Z–11–hexadecen–1–o1. Can. Ent. 109: 1393–1398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swailes, G.E., Struble, D.L., and Holmes, N.D.. 1975. Use of traps baited with virgin females for field observations on the bertha armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Can. Ent. 107: 781–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turnock, W.J., and Philip, H.G.. 1977. The outbreak of bertha armyworm Mamestra configurata (Noctuidae: Lepidoptera), in Alberta, 1971–1975. Manitoba Ent. 11: 10–21.Google Scholar
Underhill, E.W., Steck, W.F., and Chisholm, M.D.. 1977. A sex pheromone mixture for the bertha armyworm moth, Mamestra configurata: (Z)–9–tetradecen–1–o1 acetate and (Z)–11–hexadecen–1–o1 acetate. Can. Ent. 109: 1335–1340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wall, C. 1984. The exploitation of insect communication by man—fact or fantasy? pp. 379–400in Lewis, T. (Ed.), Insect Communication. Academic Press.Google Scholar