No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 31 May 2012
The former notice of this species was very brief and imperfect, having as there stated, been made from a single specimen which had been untimely nipped from its pupa case. since then I have bred and captured other specimens. It may be G. Venustella Clem., proc. Acad. Nat. Sci., 1860, P. 92,and re-described by Dr. Clemens, Proc. Ent. Soc. Phila, 1863, p. 216. It does not agree accurately with either of Dr. Clemens' descriptions, but it seems to be a somewhat variable species, though some of the most striking marks in my three specimens are not mentioned by Dr. Clemens.