Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T10:26:13.156Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

LABORATORY PROPAGATION OF CEUTHORRHYNCHIDIUS HORRIDUS (COLEOPTERA: CURCULIONIDAE),1 AN INTRODUCED WEEVIL FOR BIOCONTROL OF CARDUUS THISTLES2

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

J.T. Trumble  and
L.T. Kok
J.T. Trumble
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061
L.T. Kok
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The development of Ceuthorrhynchidius horridus (Panzer) was observed on five diets consisting of less than 15% dry weight of host-plant material. Adult yields per inoculated larvae were low (less than 1%), although yields from uncontaminated last instars reached as high as 16.6%. Comparisons of diet versus plant-reared weevils showed that (1) larval weight gain at 28 days was significantly greater for plant-reared larvae, (2) plant-reared adults were significantly larger than diet-grown weevils, but there was no difference in fertility, and (3) egg size, viability, and first instar head capsule widths were not significantly different for progeny from diet and plant-reared weevils.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 110 , Issue 10 , October 1978 , pp. 1091 - 1094
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Davis, G. F. 1972. Refining diets for optimal performance, pp. 171–181 in Rodrigues, J.G. (Ed.), Insect and mite nutrition. North-Holland, Amsterdam. 702 pp.Google Scholar
Frick, K.E. 1969. Ceuthorhynchus (Hadroplontus) trimaculatus (F.) and Ceuthorhynchidius horridus (Panz.), two weevils of potential value for the biological control of thistles in the genus Carduus L. in Mimeo. Rep. Biological control of weeds investigations, USDA, ARS Ent. Res. Div. Albany, California. 17 pp.Google Scholar
Harris, P. 1973. The selection of effective agents for the biological control of weeds. Can. Ent. 105: 1495–1503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kok, L. T. 1975. Host specificity studies on Ceuthorhynchidius horridus (Panzer) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) for the biocontrol of musk and plumeless thistle. Weed Res. 15: 21–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kok, L.T., Ward, R.H., and Grills, C.C.. 1975. Biological studies of Ceuthorhynchidius horridus, an introduced weevil for thistle control. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 68: 503–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trumble, J.T. 1977. Nutritional studies on Ceuthorrhynchidius horridus (Panzer), an introduced weevil for the biocontrol of Carduus thistles. M.S. Thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia. 84 pp.Google Scholar
Trumble, J.T. and Kok, L.T.. 1976. Laboratory propagation of Ceuthorhynchidius horridus (Panzer), an introduced weevil for the biocontrol of thistles in Virginia. Virginia J. Sci. 27: 38 (Abstract).Google Scholar
Ward, R.H., Pienkowski, R.L, and Kok, L.T.. 1974. Host specificity of the first instarof Ceuthorhynchidius horridus, a weevil for the biological control of thistles. J. econ. Ent. 67: 735–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zwölfer, H. and Harris, P.. 1971. Host specificity determination of insects for biological control of weeds. A. Rev. Ent. 16: 159–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar