Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:11:20.013Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Insects and Other Invertebrates Associated with Flowering Skunk Cabbage, Symplocarpus foetidus (L.) Nutt., at Fanshawe Lake, Ontario1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

W. W. Judd
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Most of the species of plants in the arum family, Araceae, have their flowers arranged on a central spadix which is surrounded by an enveloping spathe. These floral mechanisms have been classified by Müller (1883). The simplest type, represented by the water-arum, Calla palustris, has the spadix fully exposed and the spathe held back from it. Secondly, there is the type in which the spadix is surrounded by the spathe and is only partly visible through the opening of the spathe, as represented by the skunk cabbage, Symplocarpus foetidus. Thirdly, there is the most elaborate arrangement, represented by the cuckoo pint, Arum maculatum. In this type the spathe surrounds the spadix and is constricted a short distance above its base to form a chamber surrounding the flowers which are concentrated at the base of the spadix. Thus there is formed a “pitfall mechanism” or “kettle trap” which entraps insects that have entered the spathe and ensures the pollination of the flowers by the insects (McLean and Ivimey-Cook, 1956; Müller, 1883).

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 93 , Issue 4 , April 1961 , pp. 241 - 249
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1961

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Achard, J. M. 1923. Étude sur le genre Zygogramma Chev. Fragments entomologiques, Prague (1923): 51–65.Google Scholar
Alexander, C. P. 1942. Family Trichoceridae. Diptera or True Flies of Connecticut. Conn. State Geol. and Nat. Hist. Surv. Bull. 64: 188–192.Google Scholar
Blatchley, W. S. 1910. Coleoptera or beetles known to occur in Indiana. Nature Publ. Co., Indianapolis.Google Scholar
Blatchley, W. S. 1926. Heteroptera or true bugs of eastern North America. Nature Publ. Co., Indianapolis.Google Scholar
Brown, W. J. 1945. Food-plants and distribution of the species of Calligrapha in Canada, with descriptions of new species (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae). Can. Entomol., 77: 117–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, W. L. 1956. Drosophilid and chloropid flies bred from skunk cabbage. Psyche., 63: 13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chamberlin, R. V., and Hoffman, R. L.. 1958. Check list of the millipeds of North America. U.S. Nat. Museum Bull. No. 212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curran, C. H. 1934. The families and genera of North American Diptera. Ballou Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Ewes, D. 1959. Zantedeschia. African Wild Life, 13: 8–12.Google Scholar
Erdtman, G. 1952. Pollen morphology and plant taxonomy. Angiosperms. Chronica Botanica Co., Waltham, Mass.Google Scholar
Gertsch, W. J. 1948. The Spider Book. Comstock Publ. Co., Ithaca.Google Scholar
Hoffman, C. E. 1939. Morphology of the immature stages of some northern Michigan Donaciini (Chrysomelidae; Coleoptera). Papers Mich. Acad. Sci., Arts and Lett., 25: 245–292.Google Scholar
Judd, W. W. 1949. Insects collected in the Dundas Marsh, Hamilton, Ontario, 1947–48. Jour. New York Entomol. Soc., 57: 225–231.Google Scholar
Kelton, L. A. 1955. Species of Lygus, Liocoris, and their allies in the Prairie Provinces of Canada (Hemiptera: Miridae). Can. Entomol., 87: 531–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerner, A., and Oliver, F. W.. 1894. The natural history of plants. Vol. 1. Henry Holt and Co., New York.Google Scholar
Kerner, A., and Oliver, F. W.. 1895. The natural history of plants. Vol. 3. Henry Holt and Co., New York.Google Scholar
Knuth, P. 1906. Handbook of flower pollination, vol. 1. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Knuth, P. 1909. Handbook of flower pollination, vol. 3. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
LaRocque, A. 1953. Catalogue of the recent Mollusca of Canada. National Museum of Canada, Bull. 129.Google Scholar
Marx, E. J. F. 1957. A review of the subgenus Donacia in the Western Hemisphere (Coleoptera, Donaciidae). Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., 112 (art. 3).Google Scholar
McLean, R. C., and Ivimey-Cook, W. R.. 1956. Textbook of theoretical botany. Longmans, Green and Co., New York.Google Scholar
Monrós, F. 1955. On some new genera of Nearctic Chrysomelinae (Chrysomelidae). Coleopterist' Bull., 9: 53–60.Google Scholar
Müller, H. 1883. The fertilization of flowers. MacMillan and Co., London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pilsbry, H. A. 1948. Land Mollusca of North America (north of Mexico). Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, Monogr. 3, vol. 2, part 2.Google Scholar
Schaeffer, C. 1925. Revision of the New World species of the tribe Donaciini of the coleopterous family Chrysomelidae. Brooklyn Mus. Sci. Bull., 3: 45–165.Google Scholar
Trelease, W. 1879. On the fertilization of Symplocarpus foetidus. American Naturalist, 13: 580–581.Google Scholar
Viereck, H. L. 1916. The Hymenoptera, or wasp-like insects, of Connecticut. Conn. State Geol. and Nat. Hist. Surv. Bull. No. 22.Google Scholar
Walker, E. M. 1927. The woodlice or Oniscoidea of Canada (Crustacea, Isopoda). Can. Field-Nat., 41: 173–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar