Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T17:25:06.391Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Insecticide resistance in field populations of Leucinodes orbonalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) in India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 March 2017

Dattatray Shirale ,
Meena Patil  and
Srinivas Parimi
Dattatray Shirale*
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University, Aurangabad 431004, Maharashtra, India
Meena Patil
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University, Aurangabad 431004, Maharashtra, India
Srinivas Parimi
Affiliation:
Mahyco Research Center, PO Box 76, Jalna-Aurangabad Road, Jalna 431203, Maharashtra, India
*
1Corresponding author (e-mail: [email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The status of insecticide resistance in field populations of eggplant fruit and shoot borer, Leucinodes orbonalis (Guenée) (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) from the major vegetable growing regions of India was determined during the cropping seasons of 2009–2010 and 2010–2011. Six commonly used insecticides: carbaryl, chlorpyriphos, deltamethrin, endosulfan, fenvalerate, and profenofos were tested against L. orbonalis larvae. The resistance ratios (RR) at the lethal dosage (LD)50 levels were estimated as RR=LD50 field strain/LD50 susceptible strain. The L. orbonalis populations exhibited widespread resistance to tested insecticides. The highest average RR in the two-year study was observed in the assays of populations with deltamethrin (21.50–82.42-fold) followed by assays conducted with endosulfan (24.47–68.26-fold), chlorpyriphos (22.17–63.14-fold), carbaryl (39.18–49.09-fold), and fenvalerate (14.00–44.66-fold); and the lowest average RRs were observed in the assays with profenofos (16.65–39.43-fold). The high levels of LD50 values can be attributed to the long-term indiscriminate use of these insecticides in eggplant (Solanum melongena Linnaeus; Solanaceae) growing regions.

Type
Insect Management
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 149 , Issue 3 , June 2017 , pp. 399 - 407
Copyright
© Entomological Society of Canada 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Subject editor: Christopher Cutler

References

Ali, M.I. 1994. Circumstantial evidence supports insect resistance in Bangladesh. Resistance Pest Management Newsletter, 61: 3–4.Google Scholar
Anand, M. 2003. Studies on mass culturing of the brinjal shoot and fruit borer, on semi-synthetic diet. In Proceedings of the National Symposium on Frontier Areas of Entomological Research, Edited by B. Subrahmanyam, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India. Pp. 563–564.Google Scholar
Armes, N.J., Jadhav, D.R., and King, A.B.S. 1992. Pyrethroid resistance in the pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera, in southern India. In Proceeding Brighton crop protection conference, pests and diseases. British Crop Protection Council, Farnham, United Kingdom. Pp. 239–244.Google Scholar
Armes, N.J., Wightman, J.A., Jadhav, D.R., and Rao., G.V.R. 1997. Status of insecticide resistance in Spodoptera litura in Andhra Pradesh, India. Pesticide Science, 50: 240–248.3.0.CO;2-9>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asian Vegetable Research and Development Center. 1999. Rearing of egg plant fruit and shoot borer, L. orbonalis. A slide set and illustrated guide. Asian Vegetable Research and Development Center, Shanhua, Taiwan. Pp. 99–486.Google Scholar
Bhosale, S.V., Suryawanshi, D.S., and Bhede, B.V. 2008. Insecticide resistance in field population of American bollworms, Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner). (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Pestology, 32: 19–22.Google Scholar
Borad, P.K., Patel, C.C., Patel, J.R., and Chavda, A.J. 2001. Studies on insecticide resistance in Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) in Gujarat State. Indian Journal of Plant Protection, 29: 97–100.Google Scholar
Chatterjee, M.L. and Roy, S. 2004. Bio efficacy of some insecticides against brinjal shoot and fruit borer, Leucinodes orbonalis (Guen.) and effect of Novaluron on natural enemies of brinjal pests. Pestology, 28: 52–56.Google Scholar
Chaturvedi, I. 2004. A survey of insecticide resistance in Helicoverpa armigera in central and south Indian cotton ecosystems, 1999 to 2003. Resistance Pest Management Newsletter, 14: 36–40.Google Scholar
Choudhary, B. and Gaur, K. 2009. The development and regulation of Bt brinjal in India (eggplant/aubergine). International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-Biotech Applications Brief, 38: 1–102.Google Scholar
Dhamdhere, S., Dhamdhere, S.V., and Mathur, R. 1995. Occurrence and succession of pests of brinjal, Solanum melongena Linn. at Gwalior (Madhya Pradesh), India. Journal of Entomological Research, 19: 71–77.Google Scholar
Dhingra, S., Phokela, A., and Mehrotra, K.N. 1988. Cypermethrin resistance in the populations of Helicoverpa armigera Hubner. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences, 58: 123–125.Google Scholar
Finney, D.J. 1971. Probit analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
Haseeb, M., Sharma, D.K., and Qamar, M. 2009. Estimation of the losses caused by shoot and fruit borer, Leucinodes orbonalis Guen. (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in brinjal. Trends in Biosciences, 2: 68–69.Google Scholar
Ishtiaq, M., Mushtaq, A., Saleem, M., and Razaq, M. 2012. Monitoring of resistance in Spodoptera exigua (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) from four districts of the southern Punjab, Pakistan to four conventional and six new chemistry insecticides. Crop Protection, 33: 13–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kapoor, S.K., Singh, J., Russell, D., Singh, B., and Kalra, R.L. 2002. Susceptibility change of Helicoverpa armigera Hubner to different insecticides in Punjab. Pesticide Research Journal, 14: 177–180.Google Scholar
Kranthi, S.R., Kranthi, S., Behere, G.T., Dhawad, C.S., Wadaskar, R.M., Banerjee, S.K., et al. 2004. Recent advances in insecticide resistance management (IRM) strategies for sustainable cotton pest management in India. Lead papers of National Symposium on cotton, Central Institute for Cotton Research, Nagpur, India. Pp. 221–231.Google Scholar
Lal, R. 1998. Response of Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) to pyrethroids. Pesticide Research Journal, 10: 129–131.Google Scholar
Mishra, N.C. and Dash, D. 2007. Evaluation of synthetic and neem based pesticide schedules against shoot and fruit borer (Leucinodes orbonalis Guen.) on brinjal. Journal of Plant Protection and Environment, 4: 93–96.Google Scholar
National Horticulture Board. 2014. Indian horticulture database [online]. Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India. Available from http://nhb.gov.in/area-pro/NHB_Database_2015.pdf [accessed 4 February 2016].Google Scholar
Rahman, A.K.M.Z. 1997. Screening of 28 brinjal line for resistance/tolerance against the brinjal shoot and fruit borer. Annual Report. Entomology Division, Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute, Joydebpur, Gazipur, Bangladesh.Google Scholar
Rahman, M.M. and Rahman, M.M. 2009. Study on the development of resistance in brinjal shoot and fruit borer against different insecticides. World Journal of Zoology, 4: 137–143.Google Scholar
Ramasubramanian, T. and Regupathy, A. 2004. Magnitude and mechanism of insecticide resistance in Helicoverpa armigera Hub. population of Tamil Nadu, India. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences, 3: 94–100.Google Scholar
Rao, G.R. and Dhingra, S. 1996. Relative susceptibility of different larval instar Spodoptera litura (Fabricius) to some synthetic pyrethroids. Journal of Entomological Research, 20: 103–108.Google Scholar
Roy, D.C. and Pande, Y.D. 1994. Damage to brinjal by Lepi. Pyraustidae and economics of its insecticidal control. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, 28: 110–120.Google Scholar
Sahoo, S.K., Kapoor, S.K., and Singh, B. 2007. Insecticide resistance management in Spodoptera litura (Fabricius) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Punjab, India. Pesticide Research Journal, 19: 226–230.Google Scholar
Shafiq Ansari, M., Asif, M., and Azizur Rahaman, M.D. 2002. Evaluation of insecticides on tobacco caterpillar Spodoptera litura (Fab.). Pestology, 25: 31–33.Google Scholar
Sharma, J.D., Nagreta, D.S., and Nath, A. 2004. Management of brinjal shoot and fruit borer, Leucinodes orbonalis Guen. and persistence of betacyfluthrin in brinjal fruits. Pesticide Research Journal, 16: 139–143.Google Scholar
Shivalingaswamy, T.M., Rai, S., Wahundeniya, I., Cork, A., Ammaranan, C., and Talekar, N.S. 2003. Development of an integrated pest management strategy for eggplant fruit and shoot borer in South Asia. Technical Bulletin TB 28. Asian Vegetable Research and Development Center, Shanhua, Taiwan.Google Scholar
Venkataiah, M., Subrarathnam, G.V., and Rosaiah, B. 1990. Development of resistance by gram pod borer to fenvalerate. Indian Journal of Plant Protection, 18: 285–286.Google Scholar
Venkateswarlu, U.U., Madhumathi, I., and Rao, P.A. 2005. Relative toxicity of novel insecticides against insecticide resistant Guntur, strain of Spodoptera litura (Fab.) on cotton in Andhra Pradesh. Pesticide Research Journal, 17: 33–35.Google Scholar