Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-28T02:24:53.411Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

INSECT CONTROL BY ARTIFICIALLY PROLONGING PLANT DORMANCY — A NEW APPROACH

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

D. C. Eidt  and
C. H. A. Little
D. C. Eidt
Affiliation:
Forest Research Laboratory, Department of Forestry and Rural Development, Fredericton, New Brunswick
C. H. A. Little
Affiliation:
Forest Research Laboratory, Department of Forestry and Rural Development, Fredericton, New Brunswick
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Insect control methods are usually aimed directly at the insects. Examples are insect exclusion, poisons, and the more recent methods which upset metabolism, nervous coordination, sensory perception, or fertility. Some methods are indirect and involve manipulation of insect parasites, predators and diseases, habitat destruction, and host management. Only selection and breeding for host resistance are directed at the host of the insect. This is somewhat surprising because the host–insect relationship presents some of the most vulnerable aspects of the life of an insect.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 100 , Issue 12 , December 1968 , pp. 1278 - 1279
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Addicott, F. T. et al. 1968. Abscisic acid: a new name for abscisin II (dormin). Science, N.Y. 159: 1493.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Audis, L. J. 1965. Plant growth substances. Interscience Publishers, New York.Google Scholar
Brian, P. W., Petty, J. H. P., and P. T., Richmond. 1959. Extended dormancy of deciduous woody plants treated in autumn with gibberellic acid. Nature, Lond. 184: 69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
El-Antably, H. M. M., Wareing, P. F., and Hillman, J.. 1967. Some physiological responses to d,l abscisin (dormin). Planta 73: 74–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Embree, D. G. 1965. The population dynamics of the winter moth in Nova Scotia, 1954–1962. Mem. Ent. Soc. Can., No. 46.Google Scholar
Geier, P. W. 1966. Management of insect pests. Ann. Rev. Ent. 11: 471–490.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Little, C. H. A., and Eidt, D. C.. 1968. Effect of abscisic acid on budbreak and transpiration in woody species. Nature, Lond. 220: 498–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, R. F. (Editor). 1963. The dynamics of epidemic spruce budworm populations. Mem. Ent. Soc. Can., No. 31.Google Scholar
Schütte, F. 1963. Bekämpfung des Eichenwicklers (Tortrix viridana L.) durch Verzögerung des Knospenaustriebs. Proc. 4th Int. Congr. Crop Prot. 1960, Vol. 2, pp. 1329–1332.Google Scholar
Schwerdtfeger, F. 1962. Das eichenwickler Problem. Forsch. u. Berat. Landesaussch. Landw. Forsch. Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen (Ser. C), No. 1, 1961.Google Scholar