Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T15:22:02.849Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

INFLUENCE OF RESISTANT AND SUSCEPTIBLE MAIZE INBRED LINES ON THE BIOLOGY OF THE EUROPEAN CORN BORER, OSTRINIA NUBILALIS (LEPIDOPTERA: PYRALIDAE), AFTER NATURAL OVERWINTERING CONDITIONS IN SOUTHWESTERN QUEBEC1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

M. Hudon  and
M. S. Chiang
M. Hudon
Affiliation:
Research Station, Agriculture Canada, St. Jean, Quebec
M. S. Chiang
Affiliation:
Research Station, Agriculture Canada, St. Jean, Quebec
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Forty exotic maize inbred lines from 10 countries with known resistance or susceptibility to the European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis (Hübner), were used to study the effect of plant resistance on borer survival from natural overwintering conditions and particularly the fecundity of the female moth during the following summer. Also, additional information was obtained on different biological characters of the insect. Resistant and susceptible lines were grouped according to their leaf feeding ratings (antibiosis), per cent borer survival at pollination time or at harvest (tolerance). Each specimen observed was kept on the same plant tissue until pupation. The number of eggs and egg masses/female was significantly higher only when lines are grouped according to their leaf feeding ratings. No significant differences were obtained in most biological characters of borers fed on resistant or susceptible maize lines: spring pupation, pupal parasitism, mortality and weight, moth emergence and sex ratio.

Résumé

Quarante lignées de maïs connues pour leur résistance ou leur sensibilité à la Pyrale du maïs Ostrinia nubilalis (Hübner) venant de dix pays, ont servi à l’étude de l’effet de la résistance des plantes vis-à-vis la survivance de l’insecte dans des conditions naturelles d’hivernement et notamment, la fécondité des papillons femelles l’été suivant. Des données additionelles sur différents charactères biologiques de l’insecte ont aussi été obtenues. Chaque individu étudié s’est nourri de la même lignée de maïs jusqu’à sa métamorphose printanière. Les lignées résistantes et sensibles à la Pyrale furent groupées selon la criblure du feuillage ou phénomène d’antibiose de la plante, le pourcentage de survie des larves à la pollinisation ou à la récolte des plantes (tolérance). Le nombre d’œufs ou de pontes par femelle a été significativement plus grand seulement lorsque les lignées sont groupées selon la criblure du feuillage. Aucune différence significative dans le comportement vital de l’insecte a été observée entre individus nourris sur du maïs résistant ou sensible, c’est-à-dire la chrysalidation printanière, la mortalité, le parasitisme ou le poids chez la chrysalide, ainsi que l’émergence des adultes et leur sexe.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 109 , Issue 7 , July 1977 , pp. 931 - 942
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chiang, H. C. and Holdaway, F. G.. 1960. Relative effectiveness of resistance of field corn to the European corn borer, Pyrausta nubilalis, in crop protection and in population control. J. econ. Ent. 53: 918–924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dicke, F. F. 1954. Breeding for resistance to European corn borer. Proc. Hybrid Corn Industry Res. Conf. 9: 44–53.Google Scholar
Fleming, A. A., Singh, R., Hayes, H. K., and Pinnell, E. L.. 1958. Inheritance in maize of reaction to European corn borer and its relationship to certain agronomic characters. Tech. Bull. Exp. Stn 226. 16 pp.Google Scholar
Guthrie, W. D. 1971. Resistance of maize to second-brood European corn borer. Proc. Hybrid Corn Industry Res. Conf. 26: 165–179.Google Scholar
Guthrie, W. D., Dicke, F. F., and Neiswander, C. R.. 1960. Leaf and sheath feeding resistance to the European corn borer in eight inbred lines of dent corn. Res. Bull. Ohio agric. Exp. Stn 860. 38 pp.Google Scholar
Klun, J. A. and cooperators. 1973. An evaluation of resistance of 41 corn inbred lines to the European corn borer by chemical analysis of the plant tissues. Rep. int. Proj. on Ostrinia nubilalis, Phase I, pp. 104–108.Google Scholar
Oliver, B. F. and Gifford, J. R.. 1975. Weight differences among stalk borer larvae collected from rice lines showing resistance in field studies. J. econ. Ent. 68: 134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Painter, R. H. 1951. Insect resistance in crop plants. Macmillan, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patch, L. H. 1937. Resistance of a single cross hybrid strain of field corn to European corn borer. J. econ. Ent. 30: 271–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patch, L. H. 1943. Survival, weight and location of European corn borers feeding on resistant and susceptible field corn. J. agric. Res. 66: 7–19.Google Scholar
Reed, G. L., Bridley, T. A., and Showers, W. B.. 1972. Influence of resistant corn, leaf tissue on the biology of the European corn borer. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 65: 658–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, I. D. and Pereverzev, D. S.. 1975. Reproductive potential of the European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis Hübner, feeding on maize lines with different resistance. Rep. int. Proj. on Ostrinia nubilalis, Phase II, pp. 72–79.Google Scholar
Shapiro, I. D., Shura-Bura, G. B., Galeev, G. S., and Pereverzev, D. S.. 1973. Results of a study on the resistance of some corn inbred lines to the European corn borer 1970. Rep. int. Proj. on Ostrinia nubilalis, Phase I, pp. 109–116.Google Scholar
Windels, M. B. 1975. Weight, fecundity and longevity of corn borers collected from maize inbreds. Rep. int. Proj. on Ostrinia nubilalis, Phase II, pp. 113–114.Google Scholar