Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:58:30.413Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE INFLUENCE OF PARASITISM BY APANTELES FUMIFERANAE VIER. (HYMENOPTERA: BRACONIDAE) ON SPRING DISPERSAL AND CHANGES IN THE DISTRIBUTION OF LARVAE OF THE SPRUCE BUDWORM (LEPIDOPTERA: TORTRICIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Vincent Nealis  and
Jacques Régnière
Vincent Nealis
Affiliation:
Canadian Forestry Service, Great Lakes Forestry Centre, PO Box 490, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, Canada P6A 5M7
Jacques Régnière
Affiliation:
Canadian Forestry Service, Great Lakes Forestry Centre, PO Box 490, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, Canada P6A 5M7
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Most emerging 2nd-instar larvae of spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Clem.), tested in the laboratory were photopositive and there was no difference in response between healthy larvae and larvae parasitized by Apanteles fumiferanae Vier. However, in the field, parasitized individuals were under-represented among larvae dispersing on silk threads between tree crowns. There is evidence that this was due to the relatively late emergence of parasitized larvae. These parasitized larvae therefore encountered fewer crawling larvae at the tips of branches, and consequently their propensity for dispersing was reduced.

The vertical distribution of dispersing, parasitized larvae caught on sticky traps more closely resembled that of established larvae than it did the vertical distribution of the overwintering population. This indicates that there was some differential redistribution of parasitized and nonparasitized individuals. Despite these differences, the estimate of parasitism by A. fumiferanae based on mid-crown branch samples is justified because it is most consistent and most closely reflects the overall frequency of parasitism.

Résumé

La plupart des larves émergeantes de la tordeuse des bourgeons de l’épinette, Choristoneura fumiferana (Clem.), testées en laboratoire étaient photopositives, et nous n’avons trouvé aucune différence de réponse entre les larves saines et celles parasitées par Apanteles fumiferanae Vier. Toutefois, sur le terrain, les individus parasités étaient sous-représentés parmi les larves se dispersant sur un fil de soie entre les couronnes des arbres. Certaines données suggèrent que ceci serait causé par l’émergence relativement tardive des larves parasitées. Ces mêmes larves rencontreraient moins de larves rampant à l’extrémité des branches, ce qui les porterait moins à se disperser.

La distribution verticale du taux de parasitisme dans les larves en dispersion capturées sur des pièges collants se rapproche davantage de celle dans les larves établies que de celle dans les larves en hibernation, ce qui indique une redistribution différentielle, dans la couronne, des individus parasités et non-parasités. En dépit de ces différences, un estimé du taux de parasitisme par A. fumiferanae obtenu à partir d’un échantillon prélevé à la mi-couronne est justifié puisque c’est là que ce taux est le plus consistant et qu’il reflète le plus étroitement le taux global.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 119 , Issue 2 , February 1987 , pp. 141 - 146
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1987

References

Brown, N.R. 1946. Studies on parasites of the spruce budworm, Archips fumiferana (Clem.). I. Life history of Apanteles fumiferanae Viereck (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Can. Ent. 78: 121–129.Google Scholar
Grisdale, D. 1970. An improved laboratory method for rearing large numbers of spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Can. Ent. 102: 1111–1117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennings, D.T., Houseweart, M.W., and Dimond, J.B.. 1983. Dispersal losses of early-instar spruce budworm (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) larvae in strip clearcut and dense spruce-fir forests of Maine. Environ. Ent. 12: 1787–1782.Google Scholar
Lewis, F.B. 1960. Factors affecting the assessment of parasitization by Apanteles fumiferanae Vier. and Glypta fumiferanae (Vier.) on spruce budworm larvae. Can. Ent. 92: 881–891.Google Scholar
McMorran, A. 1965. A synthetic diet for the spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Clem.) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Can. Ent. 97: 58–62.Google Scholar
Miller, C.A. 1958. The measurement of spruce budworm populations and mortality during the first and second larval instars. Can. J. Zool. 36: 409–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Régnière, J., and Fletcher, R.M.. 1983. Direct measurement of spruce budworm (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) larval dispersal in forest stands. Environ. Ent. 12: 1532–1538.Google Scholar
Renault, T.R. 1972. Post-diapause activity and survival of spruce budworm larvae in relation to the sequence of spring emergence. Dep. Environ., Can. For. Serv., Fredericton, N.B.Inf. Rep. M-X-32.,11 pp.Google Scholar
Ryan, R.B. 1985. A hypothesis for decreasing parasitization by larch casebearer (Lepidoptera: Coleophoridae) on larch foliage by Agathis pumila. Can. Ent. 117: 1573–1574.Google Scholar
Thomas, A.W. 1984. Individual rearing of spruce budworm larvae. Dep. Environ., Can. For. Serv., Ottawa, Ont. CFS Res. Notes 4: 23–25.Google Scholar
Wellington, W.G. 1948. The light reactions of the spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana Clemens (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Can. Ent. 80: 56–82A.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wellington, W.G., and Henson, W.R.. 1947. Notes on the effects of physical factors on the spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Clem.). Can. Ent. 79: 168–170.Google Scholar