Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T22:36:30.225Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

HOST SELECTION BY THE ADULT CABBAGE MAGGOT, HYLEMYA BRASSICAE (DIPTERA: ANTHOMYIIDAE): EFFECT OF GLUCOSINOLATES AND COMMON NUTRIENTS ON OVIPOSITION1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

K. S. S. Nair  and
F. L. McEwen
K. S. S. Nair
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario
F. L. McEwen
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In Hylemya brassicae (Bouché) little oviposition occurred when access to host plant material was denied. The mustard oil, allyl isothiocyanate (AITC), stimulated the flies into greater activity and attracted them to its source. Sinigrin and four other glucosinolates (mustard oil glucosides) tested induced oviposition. AITC by itself did not induce, oviposition, but in the presence of a glucosinolate, small concentrations of AITC caused an increase in the number of eggs laid. Glucose, sucrose, casein, wheat germ oil, and a mixture of B-vitamins did not influence oviposition at the concentrations tested, but casein hydrolysate inhibited it. The role of glucosinolates and common nutrients in host selection by H. brassicae is discussed.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 108 , Issue 10 , October 1976 , pp. 1021 - 1030
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beck, S. D. 1965. Resistance of plants to insects. A. Rev. Ent. 10: 207–232.Google Scholar
Chippendale, G. M. and Beck, S. D.. 1965. A method for rearing the cabbage looper, Trichoplusia ni, on a meridic diet. J. econ. Ent. 58: 377–378.Google Scholar
Coaker, T. H. 1969. New approaches to cabbage root fly control. Proc. 5th Br. Insect Fungic. Conf. 3: 704–710.Google Scholar
Coaker, T. H. and Finch, S.. 1971. The cabbage root fly, Erioischia brassicae (Bouché). Rep. natn. Veg. Res. Stn for 1970 (Wellesbourne, Warwick), pp. 23–42.Google Scholar
David, W. A. L. and Gardiner, B. O. C.. 1962. Oviposition and the hatching of the eggs of Pieris brassicae (L.) in a laboratory culture. Bull. ent. Res. 53: 91–109.Google Scholar
David, W. A. L. and Gardiner, B. O. C.. 1966. Mustard oil glucosides as feeding stimulants for Pieris brassicae larvae in a semi-synthetic diet. Ent. exp. appl. 9: 247–255.Google Scholar
Dethier, V. G. 1966. Feeding behaviour. In Haskel, P. T. (Ed.), Symp. No. 3, pp. 46–58. Roy. ent. Soc., London.Google Scholar
Dethier, V. G. 1970. Chemical interactions between plants and insects. In Sondheimer, E. and Simeone, J. B. (Eds.), Chemical ecology. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Eckenrode, C. J. and Arn, H.. 1972. Trapping cabbage maggots with plant bait and allyl isothiocyanate. J. econ. Ent. 65: 1343–1345.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fraenkel, G. S. 1959. The raison d'être of secondary plant substances. Science 129: 1466–1470.Google Scholar
Fraenkel, G. S. 1969. Evaluation of our thoughts on secondary plant substances. Ent. exp. appl. 12: 473–486.Google Scholar
Gothilf, S. and Beck, S. D.. 1967. Larval feeding behaviour of the cabbage looper, Trichoplusia ni. J. Insect Physiol. 13: 1039–1053.Google Scholar
Gupta, P. D. and Thorsteinson, A. J.. 1960. Food plant relationships of the diamond-back moth [Plutella maculipennis (Curt.)]. II. Sensory regulation of oviposition of the adult female. Ent. exp. appl. 3: 305–314.Google Scholar
Harris, C. R. and Svec, H. J.. 1966. Mass rearing of the cabbage maggot under controlled environmental conditions with observations on the biology of cyclodiene-susceptible and resistant strains. J. econ. Ent. 59: 569–573.Google Scholar
Kennedy, J. S. 1956. The experimental analysis of aphid behaviour and its bearing on current theories of instinct. Proc. 10th int. Congr. Ent. 2: 397–404.Google Scholar
Kennedy, J. S. 1965. Mechanisms of host plant selection. Ann. appl. Biol. 56: 317–322.Google Scholar
Kjaer, A. 1960. Naturally derived isothiocyanates (mustard oils) and their parent glucosides. Prog. Chem. Org. Nat. Prod. 18: 122–176.Google Scholar
Nair, K. S. S., McEwen, F. L., and Alex, J. F.. 1974. Oviposition and development of Hylemya brassicae (Bouché) (Diptera: Anthomyiidae) on cruciferous weeds. Proc. ent. Soc. Ont. (1973) 104: 11–15.Google Scholar
Nayar, J. K. and Thorsteinson, A. J.. 1963. Further investigations into the chemical basis of insect-host plant relationships in an oligophagous insect, Plutella maculipennis (Curtis) (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae). Can. J. Zool. 43: 923–929.Google Scholar
Schoonhoven, L. M. 1972. Secondary plant substances and insects. In Runeckles, V. C. and Tso, T. C. (Eds.), Structural and functional aspects of phytochemistry. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Swailes, G. E. 1961. Laboratory studies on mating and oviposition of Hylemya brassicae (Bouché) (Diptera: Anthomyiidae). Can. Ent. 93: 940–943.Google Scholar
Thorsteinson, A. J. 1953. The chemotactic responses that determine host specificity in an oligophagous insect [Plutella maculipennis (Curt.) (Lepidoptera)]. Can. J. Zool. 31: 52–72.Google Scholar
Thorsteinson, A. J. 1960. Host selection in phytophagous insects. A. Rev. Ent. 5: 193–218.Google Scholar
Traynier, R. M. M. 1965. Chemostimulation of oviposition by the cabbage root fly Erioischia brassicae (Bouché). Nature, Lond. 207: 218–219.Google Scholar
Traynier, R. M. M. 1967 a. Effect of host plant odour on the behaviour of the adult cabbage root fly, Erioischia brassicae. Ent. exp. appl. 10: 321–328.Google Scholar
Traynier, R. M. M. 1967 b. Stimulation of oviposition by the cabbage root fly Erioischia brassicae. Ent. exp. appl. 10: 401–412.Google Scholar