Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:12:08.296Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

HOST HEMOLYMPH CHEMICALS THAT INDUCE OVIPOSITION IN THE PARASITE ITOPLECTIS CONQUISITOR (HYMENOPTERA: ICHNEUMONIDAE)1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

B. M. Hegdekar
Affiliation:
Research Station, Canada Department of Agriculture, Winnipeg, Manitoba
A. P. Arthur
Affiliation:
Research Station, Canada Department of Agriculture, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan

Abstract

A physiologically active fraction inducing oviposition in Itoplectis conquisitor (Say), and isolated from the hemolymph of some insects, was studied in detail using hemolymph from Galleria mellonella (L.) and Celerio euphorbiae (L.). The active fraction consisted of hexoses and some 19 common amino acids. The hexose component may act as a synergist in inducing oviposition while not all amino acids were necessary to induce oviposition. I. conquisitor laid eggs in the hemolymph of species of Lepidoptera, Hymenoptera, Coleoptera, and Trichoptera, but did not oviposit in the hemolymph of species belonging to Hemiptera, Orthoptera, Neuroptera, Plecoptera, and Crustacea.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arthur, A. P., Hegdekar, B. M., and Batch, W. W.. 1972. A chemically defined synthetic medium that induces oviposition in the parasite Itoplectis conquisitor (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). Can. Ent. 104: 12511258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arthur, A. P., Hegdekar, B. M., and Rollins, Lois. 1969. Component of the host hemolymph that induces oviposition in a parasitic insect. Nature, Lond. 223: 966967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbet, Sarah A. 1971. Mandibular gland secretion of larvae of the flour moth, Anagasta kuehniella, contains epideictic pheromone and elicits oviposition movements in a hymenopteran parasite. Nature, Lond. 232: 481484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dethier, V. G. 1947. The response of hymenopterous parasites to chemical stimulation of the ovipositor. J. exp. Zool. 105: 199207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doutt, R. L. 1959. The biology of parasitic hymenoptera. A. Rev. Ent. 4: 161182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubois, M., Gilles, K. A., Hemilton, J. K., Rebers, P. A., and Smith, R.. 1956. Colorimetric method for determinaton of sugars and related substances. Analyt. Chem. 28: 350352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finlayson, L. H. 1952. Host selection by Cephalonomia waterstoni Gahan (Hym. Bethylidae). Proc. IX int. Congr. Ent., Vol. 1, pp. 370374.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. C. 1959. Life history and ecology of Horogenes chrysostictos Gmelin (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae), a parasite of Ephestia sericarium Scott (Lepidoptera: Phycitidae). Can. J. Zool. 37: 429446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelotte, B. 1964. Fractionation of proteins, peptides and amino acids by gel filtration. Chap. 6, pp. 93109. In New Biochemical separations. James, A. T. and Morris, L. J. (Eds.). Van Nostrand, London.Google Scholar
Jackson, Dorothy J. 1966. Observations on the biology of Caraphractus cinctus Walker (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae) a parasitoid of the eggs of Dytiscidae (Coleoptera) III. The adult life and sex ratio. Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 118: 2349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowry, O. H., Rosebrough, N. J., Farr, A. L., and Randall, R. J.. 1951. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J. biol. Chem. 193: 265275.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Narayanan, E. S. and Chaudhuri, R. P.. 1954. Studies on Stenobracon deesae (Cam.) a parasite of certain lepidopterous borers of graminaceous crops in India. Bull. ent. Res. 45: 647659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paxton, W. A. and Burkhardt, C. C.. 1970. Response of alfalfa seed chalcid ovipositor to chemicals occurring naturally in alfalfa. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 63: 16171620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quednau, F. W. and Hubsch, H. M.. 1964. Factors influencing host-finding and host-acceptance pattern in some Aphytis species (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae). S. Afr. J. agric. Sci. 7: 543554.Google Scholar
Rosen, H. 1957. A modified ninhydrin colorimetric analysis for amino acids. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 67: 1015.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salt, G. 1937. Experimental studies in insect parasitism. V. The sense used by Trichogramma to distinguish between parasitized and unparasitized hosts. Proc. R. Soc. (B) 122: 5775.Google Scholar
Vega, A. and Nunn, P. B.. 1969. A lithium buffer system for single-column amino acid analysis. Analyt. Biochem. 32: 446453.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vinson, S. B. and Lewis, W. J.. 1965. A method of host selection by Cordiochiles nigriceps. J. econ. Ent. 58: 869871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weseloh, R. M. 1971. Influence of primary (parasite) hosts on host selection of the hyperparasite Cheiloneurus nonius (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae). Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 64: 12331236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weseloh, R. M. and Bartlett, B. R.. 1971. Influence of chemical characteristics of the secondary scale host on host selection behaviour of the hyperparasite Cheiloneurus noxius (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae). Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 64: 12591264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wylie, H. G. 1971. Oviposition restraint of Muscidifurax zaraptor (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) on parasitized housefly pupae. Can. Ent. 103: 15371544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yazgan, S. and House, H. L.. 1970. An hymenopterous insect, the parasitoid Itoplectis conquisitor, reared axenically on a chemically-defined synthetic diet. Can. Ent. 102: 13041306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar