Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T19:05:11.378Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

HERBERT D. SMITH’S OBSERVATIONS ON CITRUS BLACKFLY PARASITES IN INDIA AND MEXICO AND THE CORRELATED CIRCUMSTANCES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

S. E. Flanders
S. E. Flanders
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Control, University of California Citrus Research Center and Agricultural Experiment Station, Riverside
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In Mexico during the spring of 1950, four imported species of parasitic Hymenoptera (Amitus hesperidum Silvestri, Prospaltella smithi Silvestri, P. clypealis Silvestri, and P. opulenta Silvestri) were placed on populations of their natural host, the citrus blackfly, Aleurocanthus woglumi Ashby. Their artificial distribution and establishment throughout areas in which the host species was extremely abundant and the observed adjustment of each to its host, to its competitors, and to distinctive regional environments revealed physiological and ecological factors that determined the dominance of one species over another. These factors and the circumstances of their occurrence during 1948 to 1953, inclusive, as reported by Herbert D. Smith, Entomologist of the United States Department of Agriculture, are reviewed and amplified.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 101 , Issue 5 , May 1969 , pp. 467 - 480
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Clausen, C. P. 1940. Entomophagous Insects. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Clausen, C. P., and Berry, Paul A.. 1932. The citrus blackfly in Asia and the importation of its natural enemies into tropical America U.S. Dep. Agric. Tech. Bull. 320.Google Scholar
Flanders, S. E. 1937. Ovipositional instincts and developmental sex differences in the genus Coccophagus. Univ. Calif. Publ. Ent. 6: 401–422.Google Scholar
Flanders, S. E. 1941. Dust as an inhibiting factor in the reproduction of insects. J. econ. Ent. 34: 470–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flanders, S. E. 1959. Differential host relations of the sexes in parasite Hymenoptera. Entomologica exp. Appl. 2: 125–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flanders, S. E. 1965. Competition and cooperation among parasitic Hymenoptera related to biological control. Can. Ent. 97: 405–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flanders, S. E. 1966. The circumstances of species replacement among parasitic Hymenoptera. Can. Ent. 98: 1009–1024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerling, D. 1966. Studies with whitefly parasites of southern California Encarsia pergandiella Howard [Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae]. Can. Ent. 98: 707–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gressitt, J. L., and Flanders, S. E.. 1949. New developments in the transport of beneficial insects. J. econ. Ent. 42: 150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grinnell, J. 1928. The presence and absence of animals. Univ. Calif. Chronicle 30: 429–450.Google Scholar
Kuwana, I. 1934. Notes on newly imported parasite of the spiny whitefly attacking citrus in Japan. Proc. 5th Pacif. Sci. Congr., Vol. V, pp. 3521–3523.Google Scholar
Shaw, J. G. 1950. Eretmocerus serius as a parasite of the citrus blackfly in Mexico. J. econ. Ent. 43: 380–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silvestri, F. 1926. Descrizione di tre di Prospaltella e di una di Encarsia (Hym. Chalcididae) parassite di Aleurocanthus (Aleyrodidae). Eos. Rev. Españ. Ent. 2: 179–189.Google Scholar
Silvestri, F. 1927. Contribuzione alla conoscenza degli Aleurodidae viventi su citrus in estremo oriente e dei loro parassiti. Bollettino del Lab. Zool. gen. ed Agr. del R. Instituto Superiore Agrario di Portici.Google Scholar
Smith, H. D. 1950. Quarterly Reports Citrus blackfly investigations. Div. Foreign Parasite Introduction. Div. Bee Culture and Biological Control, Bur. Ent. and Plant Quarantine, Agr. Res. Adm. U.S.D.A.Google Scholar
Smith, H. D. 1953. A report on biological control of the citrus blackfly in Mexico. Presented at Ent. Soc. Am. Meeting, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Smith, H. D., Maltby, H. L., and Jimenez, E. J.. 1964. Biological control of the citrus blackfly in Mexico. U.S. Dep. Agric. Tech. Bull. 1311.Google Scholar
Timberlake, P. H. 1913. Preliminary report on the parasites of Coccus hesperidum in California. J. econ. Ent. 6: 293–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woglum, R. S., and Smith, H. S.. 1947. The citrus blackfly. Calif. Citrograph 32: 412–415.Google Scholar
Woglum, R. S., Smith, H. S., and Clausen, C. P.. 1952. The citrus blackfly in northwest Mexico. Calif. Citrograph 37: 356.Google Scholar
Zinna, G. 1962. Richerche sugli insetti entomofagi III. Specializzazione entomoparassitica negli Aphelinidae: Interdipendenze biocenotiche tra due specie associate. Studio morfologico, etologico e fisiologico del Coccophagoides similis (Masi) e Azotus matritensis Mercet. Boll. Lab. Ent. agr. (Filippo Silvestri) Portici 20: 73–184.Google Scholar