Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:24:38.739Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

FURTHER NOTES ON THE BUTTERFLIES OF SOUTHERN NEWFOUNDLAND

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Cyril F. Dos Passos
Affiliation:
Mendham, New Jersey

Extract

The Diurnals of southern Newfoundland were briefly commented upon last year (1935, Can. Ent. LXVII : 82). Another summer's catch by the same collector at Doyles Station has increased the number of species reported from the Island by two and possibly helped to clear up the confusion in the genus Lycaena.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1936

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE

(1)Artault de Vevy, S. 1902. Pseudo-parasitisme des Thrips. Bull. Soc. Zool. France, 27:207209.Google Scholar
(2)Ludwig, . 1912. Die “Eintagsfliegen” von Loboe. Zeitschr. f. wiss. Inseck-ten-Biol., 8:7172.Google Scholar
(3)Williams, C. B. 1921. A blood-sucking thrips. Entomologist, 54:163164.Google Scholar
(4)Senevet, G. 1922. Présence à Alger d'un Insecte fort genant pour l'Homme. Bull. Soc. Hist. Nat. de l'Afrique du Nord., 13:9798.Google Scholar
(5)Johnston, H. B. 1925. Heliothrips indiens (Bagnali) injurious to man in the Sudan. Entom. Mo. Mag., 11:132133.Google Scholar
(6)Blunck, H.* 1925. Thysanopteren. In Sorauer, 1925, Hand. d. Pflanzenkrankh., Bd., 4:246270.Google Scholar
(7)Hood, J. D. 1927. A blood-sucking thrips. Entomologist, 60:201.Google Scholar
(8)Körting, A. 1930. Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Lebensgewohnheiten und der phytopathogenen Bedeutung einiger an Getreide lebender Thysanopteren. Zeitsch. f. Angew, Ent., 16:469470, Heft. 3.Google Scholar
(9)Evans, J. W. 1932. The bionomics and economic importance of Thrips imaginis Bagnall. Pamphlet 30, Council Sc. Indus. Res., Melbourne, pp. 1718.Google Scholar