Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T19:33:42.252Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

FLEAS (SIPHONAPTERA: CERATOPHYLLIDAE) FROM NESTS OF WHITE-CROWNED SPARROWS (ZONOTRICHIA LEUCOPHRYS) IN SOUTHWESTERN ALBERTA, CANADA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Glen Chilton  and
Terry D. Galloway
Glen Chilton
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 1N4
Terry D. Galloway
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3T 2N2
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Fleas (Siphonaptera: notably species of Ceratophyllidae) parasitize many species of birds. Although adult fleas rely on the birds as their principal means of dispersal, they are not commonly collected on the host itself. Most of these fleas spend the greatest portion of their life cycle in or near the host's nest. Colonial nesting habits facilitate transfer of fleas among hosts (Hoogland and Sherman 1976), and reuse of nests or nesting cavities in successive breeding seasons enhances transmission from one generation to the next (Hopla and Loye 1983). This stability of nest habitat and reliability of host presence favours fleas that are truly nest-bound. On the other hand, birds that defend exclusive breeding territories and construct new nests for each breeding attempt are usually host to vagabond, generalist species (Darskaya 1964).

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 127 , Issue 3 , June 1995 , pp. 443 - 444
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chilton, G., Lein, M.R., and Baptista, L.F.. 1990. Mate choice by female White-crowned Sparrows in a mixed-dialect population. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 27: 223–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darskaya, N.F. 1964. [On the comparative ecology of bird fleas of the genus Ceratophyllus Curt., 1832.] Ektoparazity. Fauna, Biologiya i prakticheskoe znachenue 4: 52–59; 169–180. [In Russian, English summary.]Google Scholar
Godfrey, W.E. 1986. The Birds of Canada. Revised Edition. National Museums of Canada, Ottawa, Ont.595 pp.Google Scholar
Holland, G.P. 1985. The Fleas of Canada, Alaska and Greenland (Siphonaptera). Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada 130: 631 pp.Google Scholar
Hoogland, J.L., and Sherman, P.W.. 1976. Advantages and disadvantages of Bank Swallow (Riparia riparia) coloniality. Ecological Monographs 46: 33–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopla, C.E., and Loye, J.E.. 1983. The ectoparasites and microorganisms associated with Cliff Swallows in west-central Oklahoma. I. Ticks and fleas. Bulletin of the Society of Vector Ecology 8: 111–121.Google Scholar
Kern, M.D. 1984. Racial differences in nests of White-crowned Sparrows. Condor 86: 455–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rand, A.L. 1948. Glaciation, an isolating factor in speciation. Evolution 2: 314–321.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rothschild, M. 1955. The distribution of Ceratophyllus borealis Rothschild, 1906 and C. garei Rothschild, 1902, with records of specimens intermediate between the two. Transactions of the Royal Entomological Society of London 107: 295–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, T.A., and Threlfall, W.. 1989. Synopsis of the Parasites of Vertebrates of Canada. Ectoparasites of Birds (Kennedy, M.J., Ed.). Queen's Printer, Edmonton, Alta. 85 pp.Google Scholar