Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:18:59.392Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE FIRST NEARCTIC RECORDS OF TWO HOLARCTIC SPECIES OF POLYMERUS HAHN, WITH REMARKS ON A MONOPHYLETIC SPECIES-GROUP (HETEROPTERA: MIRIDAE: MIRINAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Michael D. Schwartz ,
Geoffrey G.E. Scudder  and
Thomas J. Henry
Michael D. Schwartz
Affiliation:
Biosystematics Research Centre, Agriculture Canada, Research Branch, Central Experimental Farm, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0C6
Geoffrey G.E. Scudder
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6T 1W5
Thomas J. Henry
Affiliation:
Systematic Entomology Laboratory, Plant Sciences Institute, ARS, USDA, c/o U.S. National Museum of Natural History, Washington, DC, USA 20560
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

These first North American records for Polymerus cognatus (Fieber) from across Canada and the northeast United States, and P. vulneratus (Wolff) from northwest North America, indicate that the two species are naturally Holarctic. Diagnoses and dorsal habitus illustrations are provided to distinguish the taxa from other North American Polymerus species. An argument for considering P. balli Knight, P. cognatus, P. elegans (Reuter), P. flaviloris Knight, P. froeschneri Knight, and P. vulneratus a monophyletic species-group is presented.

Résumé

On rapporte la présence de Polymerus cognatus (Fieber) au Canada et au nord-est des États-Unis ainsi que de P. vulneratus (Wolff) au nord-ouest de l’Amérique du Nord. Ces premières mentions pour le continent nord-américain indiquent que ces deux espèces sont indigènes à la région holarctique. On fournit des diagnoses et des illustrations d’habitus en vue dorsale afin de différencier ces taxons des autres espèces nord-américaines de Polymerus. Une discussion de la nature monophylétique probable du groupe d’espèces comprenant P. balli Knight, P. cognatus, P. elegans (Reuter), P. flaviloris Knight, P. froeschneri Knight, et P. vulneratus est présentée.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 123 , Issue 4 , August 1991 , pp. 721 - 743
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blatchley, W.S. 1926. Heteroptera or True Bugs of Eastern North America with Especial Reference to the Faunas of Indiana and Florida. Nature Publishing Co., Indianapolis, IN.Google Scholar
Blinn, R.L., and Yonke, T.R.. 1985. An annotated list of the Miridae of Missouri (Hemiptera: Heteroptera). Trans. Mo. Acad. Sci. 19: 73–98.Google Scholar
Carvalho, J.C.M. 1959. A catalogue of the Miridae of the World. Part IV. Arch. Mus. nac., Rio de J. 48: 1–384.Google Scholar
Cockerell, T.D.A. 1893. The entomology of the mid-alpine zone of Custer County, Colorado. Trans. Am. ent. Soc. 20: 305–370.Google Scholar
Deordiev, I.T. 1986. [Toxicity of insecticides for the main components of the insect fauna of seed lucerne.] pp. 127–131 in Novozhilov, K.V. (Ed.), [Problems of Selectivity of Impact of Insecticides and Acaricides and its Role in Plant Protection.] Veses. Akad. sel'-khoz. Nauk V.I. Lenina. [English abstract, Rev. appl. Ent. Ser. A 77: 276 (1989).]Google Scholar
Downes, W. 1927. A preliminary list of the Heteroptera and Homoptera of British Columbia. Proc. ent. Soc. Br. Columb. 23: 1–22.Google Scholar
Fabricius, J.C. 1794. Entomologia systematica emendata et aucta secundum class, ordines, genera, species, adjectis synonymis, locis, obervationibus. C. G. Proft, Hafniae. 4: i–vi, 1–472 [Classis X. Ryngota. 4: 1–229].Google Scholar
Ferreira, P.S.F. 1980. Taxonomia das espécies do gênero Polymerus Hahn, 1831 (Hemiptera, Miridae), da regiao cisandina, América do Sul. Experientiae 26: 330–386.Google Scholar
Fieber, F.X. 1858. Criterien zur generischen Theilung der Phytocoriden (Capsini aut.). Wien. ent. mon. 2: 289–327, 329–347.Google Scholar
Froeschner, R.C. 1949. Contributions to a synopsis of the Hemiptera of Missouri, pt. IV. Hebridae, Mesoveliidae, Cimicidae, Anthocoridae, Cryptostemmatidae, Isometopidae, Miridae. Am. Midl. Nat. 42: 123–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillette, C.P., and Baker, C.F.. 1895. A preliminary list of the Hemiptera of Colorado. Bull. Colo. agric. Exp. Stn. 31 (Tech. Ser. 1): 1–137.Google Scholar
Giray, H. 1980. [A list of insects injurious to anise (Pimpinella anisum L.) in the Aegean region.] Türk. Bitki Kor. Derg. 4: 49–57. [English abstract, Rev. appl. Ent. Ser. A 69: 28 (1981).]Google Scholar
Heidemann, O. 1900. Papers from the Harriman Alaska Expedition XIII. Entomological Results (7): Heteroptera. Proc. Wash. Acad. Sci. 2: 503–506.Google Scholar
Henry, T.J. 1979. Descriptions and notes on five new species of Miridae from North America (Hemiptera). Melsheimer ent. ser. 27: 1–10.Google Scholar
Henry, T.J., and Wheeler, A.G. Jr, 1979. Palearctic Miridae in North America: Records of newly discovered and little-known species (Hemiptera: Heteroptera). Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 81: 257–268.Google Scholar
Henry, T.J., and Wheeler, A.G. Jr, 1988. Family Miridae Hahn, 1833. pp. 251–507 in Henry, T.J., and Froeschner, R.C. (Eds.), Catalog of the Heteroptera, or True Bugs, of Canada and the Continental United States. Brill, Leiden. 958 pp.Google Scholar
Kelton, L.A. 1980. The plant bugs of the prairie provinces of Canada (Heteroptera: Miridae). The insects and arachnids of Canada, Part 8. Agric. Can. Publ. 1703. 408 pp.Google Scholar
Kerzhner, I.M. 1967. Family Miridae (Capsidae). pp. 913–1003 in Bei-Bienko, G.Y. (Ed.), Keys to the Insects of European USSR. I. [English translation, Israel Program for Scientific Translations, Jerusalem, 1214 pp.]Google Scholar
Kerzhner, I.M. 1988. Miridae. pp. 778–857 in Lehr, P.A. (Ed.), Keys to Insects of the Far East of the USSR. Nauka, Leningrad 2. 972 pp.Google Scholar
Knight, H.H. 1923. The Miridae (or Capsidae) of Connecticut. pp. 422–658 in Britton, W.E. (Ed.), The Hemiptera of Sucking Insects of Connecticut. Bull. Conn. St. geol. nat. Hist. Surv. 34. 807 pp.Google Scholar
Knight, H.H. 1925 a. A list of Miridae and Anthocoridae from Alberta, Canada (Hemiptera). Can. Ent. 57: 181–182.Google Scholar
Knight, H.H. 1925 b. Descriptions of twelve new species of Polymerus from North America (Hemiptera, Miridae). Can. Ent. 57: 244–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, H.H. 1941. The plant bugs, or Miridae, of Illinois. Bull. Ill. St. nat. hist. Surv. 22: 1–234.Google Scholar
Knight, H.H. 1953. New species of Miridae from Missouri (Hemiptera). Ia. St. Coll. J. Sci. 27: 509–518.Google Scholar
Lammes, T., and Rinne, V.. 1990. Maps of the distribution of Finnish Heteroptera. Ent. Fenn. 1: 209–220.Google Scholar
Larochelle, A. 1984. Les punaises terrestres (Heteropteres: Géocorises) du Quebec. Fabreries Suppl. 3. 513 pp.Google Scholar
Markov, F.I. 1979 a. [The chemical control of Heteroptera on sugar beet pericarps.] Khimiya sel'sk. Khoz. 2: 7–12. [English abstract, Rev. appl. Ent. Ser. A 69: 48 (1981).]Google Scholar
Markov, F.I. 1979 b. [Bugs damaging sugar-beet seeds in Kirgizia.] Ent. Issled. Kirgizii 13: 37–44. [English abstract, Rev. appl. Ent. Ser. A 70: 423 (1982).]Google Scholar
Parshley, H.M. 1914. List of the Hemiptera–Heteroptera of Maine. Psyche 21: 139–149.Google Scholar
Parshley, H.M. 1917. Fauna of New England. 14. List of the Hemiptera—Heteroptera. Occ. Pap. Boston Soc. nat. Hist. 7: 1–125.Google Scholar
Parshley, H.M. 1919. On some Hemiptera from western Canada. Occ. Pap. Mus. Zool. Univ. Mich. 71: 1–35.Google Scholar
Reuter, O.M. 1909. Bermerkungen über nearktische Capsiden nebst Beschreiburg neurer Arten. Acta Soc. Sci. fenn. 36: 1–86.Google Scholar
Rinne, V. 1989. Review of the European Polymerus subgenus Poeciloscytus (Heteroptera, Miridae), with two new species and special reference to the Finnish fauna. Ann. ent. Fenn. 55: 89–101.Google Scholar
Schwartz, M.D. 1987. A phylogenetic review of the Mirinae and revision of the Stenodemini (Heteroptera: Miridae). Ph.D. thesis, City University of New York, New York, NY.Google Scholar
Schwartz, M.D. 1989. Polymerus castilleja, a new mirine plant bug from California and Oregon, with remarks on the generic characters of the genus Polymerus Hahn (Heteroptera: Miridae). Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 91: 461–467.Google Scholar
Schwartz, M.D., and Kelton, L.A.. 1990. Psallus salicicola, a new species, with additional records of recently discovered Palearctic Psallus Fieber from Canada (Heteroptera: Miridae: Phylinae). Can. Ent. 122: 941–947.Google Scholar
Slater, J.A. 1974. A preliminary analysis of the derivation of the Heteroptera fauna of the northeastern United States with special reference to the fauna of Connecticut. Mem. ent. Soc. Conn. pp. 145–213.Google Scholar
Southwood, T.R.E., and Leston, D.. 1959. Land and Water Bugs of the British Isles. Warne, London. 436 pp.Google Scholar
Stonedahl, G.M. 1990. Revision and cladistic analysis of the Holarctic genus Atractotomus Fieber (Heteroptera: Miridae: Phylinae). Bull. Am. Mus. nat. Hist. 198: 1–88.Google Scholar
Stichel, W. 1930. Illustrierte Bestimmungstabellen der Deutschen Wanzen. (Hemiptera–Heteroptera). Verlag W. Stichel Berlin-Hermsdorf. 6–7: 147–210.Google Scholar
Stichel, W. 1958. Illustrierte Bestimmungstabellen der Wanzen. II Europa (Hemiptera-Heteroptera Europae). Martin-Luther, Berlin-Hermsdorf. 24: 737–768.Google Scholar
Tereshchenko, V.E., and Sobchuk, N.P.. 1980. [Protection of seed crops of clover from pests.] Zashch. Rast. 5: 31. [English abstract, Rev. appl. Ent. Ser. A 69: 297 (1981).]Google Scholar
Uhler, P.R. 1878. On the Hemiptera collected by Dr. Elliott Coues, U.S.A., in Dakota and Montana, during 1873–74. Bull. U.S. geol. geogr. Surv. 4: 503–512.Google Scholar
Uhler, P.R. 1893. Summary of the collection of Hemiptera secured by Mr. E.A. Schwarz in Utah. Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 2: 366–385.Google Scholar
Van Duzee, E.P. 1889. Hemiptera from Muskoka Lake District. Can. Ent. 21: 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Duzee, E.P. 1905. List of Hemiptera taken in the Adirondack Mountains. pp. 546–556in Felt, E.P., 20th Report of the [New York] State Entomologist for 1904. Bull. N.Y. St. Mus. 97.Google Scholar
Van Duzee, E.P. 1914. A preliminary list of the Hemiptera of San Diego County, California. Trans. S. Diego Soc. nat. Hist. 2: 1–57.Google Scholar
Van Duzee, E.P. 1917. Catalogue of the Hemiptera of America north of Mexico (excepting the Aphididae, Coccidae and Aleurodidae). Univ. Calif. Publs., Ent., Vol. 2. 902 pp.Google Scholar
Vinokurov, N.N. 1988. Heteroptera of Yakutia. Keys to the fauna of the USSR. [English translation, USDA, Amerind, New Delhi, 328 pp.]Google Scholar
Wagner, E. 1971. Die Miridae Hahn, 1831, des Mittelmeerraumes und der Makaronesischen Inseln (Hemiptera, Heteroptera). Teil 1. Ent. Abh. 37 Suppl. 484 pp.Google Scholar
Wagner, E., and Weber, H.H.. 1964. Faune de France. Hétéroptères Miridae. 67: 1–592.Google Scholar
Wolff, J.F. 1801. in Panzer, G.W.F., Faunae Insectorum Germaniae initia oder Deutschlands Insecten. 100: 1–24.Google Scholar
Zheng, L., and Li, X.. 1987. Notes on genus Polymerus from China (Hemiptera: Miridae). Acta Sci. nat. Univ. Nankai 2: 45–51 [English abstract p. 52].Google Scholar