Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T22:57:52.257Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Field testing of synthetic attractants for male Grapholita libertina (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae)1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

N.K. Hillier ,
P.L. Dixon ,
W.D. Seabrook  and
D.J. Larson
N.K. Hillier*
Affiliation:
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Atlantic Cool Climate Crop Research Centre, PO Box 39088, St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada A1E 5Y7
P.L. Dixon
Affiliation:
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Atlantic Cool Climate Crop Research Centre, PO Box 39088, St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada A1E 5Y7
W.D. Seabrook
Affiliation:
University of New Brunswick, Biology Department, PO Bag Service 45111, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada E3B 6E1
D.J. Larson
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada A1B 3X9
*
2 Corresponding author (e-mail: [email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In an effort to develop an efficient monitoring method for the lingonberry fruitworm, Grapholita libertina Heinrich, an economically important pest of lingonberries, Vaccinium vitis-idaea L. var. minus Lodd. (Ericaceae), in Newfoundland, various known sex attractants for other species of the genus Grapholita Treitschke were evaluated for their ability to attract G. libertina moths in field trials in eastern Newfoundland. The chemicals tested were (E,E)-8,10-dodecadien-1-ol acetate (EE8,10-12:Ac), (E)-8-dodecen-1-ol acetate (E8-12:Ac), (Z)-8-dodecen-1-ol acetate (Z8-12:Ac), and (Z)-8-dodecen-1-ol (Z8-12:OH). Field trials in 1996 showed highest attraction to E8-12:Ac, with Z8-12:Ac and Z8-12:OH also being attractive. Trials in 1997 demonstrated that a blend of E8-12:Ac, Z8-12:Ac, and Z8-12:OH at a ratio of 85:10:5, respectively, was attractive to G. libertina males. All chemicals captured significantly more moths than did controls and all moths examined were males indicating these chemicals may be constituents of the naturally occurring female sex pheromone.

Résumé

Dans le cadre de recherches d'une méthode efficace pour étudier la tordeuse de la lingonne, Grapholita libertina Heinrich, un important ravageur de la lingonne, Vaccinium vitis-idaea L. var. minus Lodd. (Ericaceae) à Terre-Neuve, diverses substances connues pour leur pouvoir d'attraction sexuelle chez plusieurs espèces du genre Grapholita Treitschke ont été testées pour leur capacité d'attirer des G. libertina au cours d'expériences sur le terrain dans l'est de Terre-Neuve. Les substances suivantes ont servi au cours des tests : l'acétate de (E,E)-8,10-dodécadién-1-ol (EE8,10-12 : Ac), l'acétate de (E)8-dodécén-1-ol (E8-12 : Ac), l'acétate de (Z)-8-dodécén-1-ol (Z8-12 : Ac) et le (Z)-8-dodécén-1-ol (Z8-12 : OH). Les tests en nature en 1996 ont démontré que c'est le E8-12 : Ac qui est le plus attirant et que le Z8-12 : Ac et le Z8-12 : OH ont aussi un pouvoir d'attraction. Les tests de 1997 ont montré qu'un mélange de E8-12 : Ac, de Z8-12 : Ac et de Z8-12 : OH, dans des proportions de 85 : 10 : 5 respectivement, est efficace pour attirer des mâles de G. libertina Toutes les substances testées attirent significativement plus de tordeuses que des produits témoins et les spécimens capturés sont toujours des mâles, ce qui semble indiquer que ces substances entrent probablement dans la composition de la phéromone sexuelle naturelle de la femelle.

[Traduit par la Rédaction]

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 134 , Issue 5 , October 2002 , pp. 657 - 665
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

Contribution No. 134 of the Atlantic Cool Climate Crop Research Centre, St. John's, Newfoundland.

References

Ando, T., Yoshida, S., Tatsuki, S., Takahashi, N. 1977. Sex attractants for male Lepidoptera. Agricultural and Biological Chemistry 41: 1485–92Google Scholar
Arn, H. 1999. The pherolist: list of pheromones of Lepidoptera. [On-line document.] Available from http://www-pherolist.slu.se (accessed on 14 October 1999)Google Scholar
Arn, H., Toth, M., Priesner, E. 1992. List of sex pheromones of Lepidoptera and related attractants. Paris: International Organization for Biological ControlGoogle Scholar
Baker, T.C., Meyer, W., Roelofs, W.L. 1981. Sex pheromone dosage and blend specificity of response by Oriental Fruit Moth males. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 30: 269–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ecological Stratification Working Group. 1995. A national ecological framework for Canada. Ottawa, Ontario/Hull, Quebec: Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Research Branch, Centre for Land and Biological Resources Research and Environment Canada, State of Environmental Directorate, Ecozone Analysis Branch. pp 10–5Google Scholar
Gamble, D. 2002. The native berry fruit wines of Newfoundland. Canadian Grapes to Wine March issue, p 4 [Summerland, British Columbia: D Gamble]Google Scholar
Grant, G.G., Fogal, W.H., West, R.J., Slessor, K.N., Miller, G.E. 1989. A sex attractant for the spruce seed moth, Cydia strobilella (L.), and the effect of lure dosage and trap height on capture of male moths. The Canadian Entomologist 121: 691–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendrickson, P.A. 1997. The wild lingonberry (Vaccinium vitis-idaea L.var. minus Lodd) industry in North America. pp 47–8 in Smagula, J.M., Yarborough, D.E. (Eds), The Sixth International Symposium on Vaccinium Culture. Acta Horticulturae (Wageningen)Google Scholar
Mayer, M.S., McLaughlin, J.R. 1993. Handbook of insect pheromones and sex attractants. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press. pp 457–62Google Scholar
Meades, W.J. 1983. Heathlands. pp 267–318in South, G.R. (Ed), Biogeography and ecology of the Island of Newfoundland. The Hague, the Netherlands: Dr W Junk PublishersGoogle Scholar
Morris, R.F., Penney, B.G., Greenslade, G., Hendrickson, P.A., McRae, K.B. 1988. Notes on the occurrence, distribution, population levels and control of Grapholita libertina Heinr. (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), a pest of lingonberries in Newfoundland. The Canadian Entomologist 120: 867–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penney, B.G., Hendrickson, P.A., Gallagher, C.A., Churchill, R.A., Butt, E. 1996. The wild partridgeberry (Vaccinium vitis-idaea L. var. minus Lodd) industry in Newfoundland and Labrador and the potential for expansion utilizing European cultivars. Acta Horticulturae (Wageningen) 446: 139–42Google Scholar
Polavarapu, S., Seabrook, W.D. 1992. Evaluation of pheromone-baited traps and pheromone lure concentrations for monitoring Blueberry Leaftier (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) populations. The Canadian Entomologist 124: 815–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roelofs, W.L., Cardé, R.T. 1974. Oriental fruit moth and lesser appleworm attractant mixtures refined. Environmental Entomology 3: 586–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, B.F., Joiner, B.L., Rogosa, D. 1994. Minitab handbook. 3rd edition. Belmont, California: Duxbury PressGoogle Scholar
Ryan, G.A. 1978. Native trees and shrubs of Newfoundland and Labrador. St. John's: Department of Environment and Lands, Province of NewfoundlandGoogle Scholar
Sokal, R.R., Rohlf, F.J. 1995. Biometry. 3rd edition. New York: WH Freeman and CoGoogle Scholar
Walker, K.R., Welter, S.C. 1999. Effects of lure dose on efficacy of pheromone traps for monitoring Argyrotaenia citrana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in California apple orchards. Journal of Economic Entomology 92(3): 574–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar