Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T23:31:37.412Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Field evaluation of host kairomones and pheromones for capture of Conophthorus coniperda (Coleoptera: Scolytidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2012

A.M. Brauner  and
P. de Groot
A.M. Brauner
Affiliation:
Faculty of Forestry, University of Toronto, 33 Willcocks Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 3B3
P. de Groot*
Affiliation:
Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Great Lakes Forestry Centre, 1219 Queen Street East, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, Canada P6A 2E5; Faculty of Forestry, University of Toronto, 33 Willcocks Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 3B3
*
2Corresponding author (e-mail: [email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field studies were conducted to determine the attractiveness of monoterpenes and pheromones to the white pine cone beetle, Conophthorus coniperda (Schwarz), the most destructive cone and seed pest of eastern white pine, Pinus strobus L. (Pinaceae). Limonene was identified as a new attractant that acts synergistically when added to the female-produced sex pheromone, pityol. Trap catches were higher with increasing release rates of S-(–)-limonene. The enantiomers of limonene showed equivalent efficacy on mean trap catch. (–)-β-Pinene was not attractive and may be repellent to both sexes, and (–)-α-pinene was shown to have no effect on female response when added to pityol or pityol + S-(–)-limonene. The pheromones trans-verbenol, trans-pinocarveol, and myrtenol were not attractive to C. coniperda.

Résumé

Des études sur le terrain ont été effectuées afin de déterminer le pouvoir attractif des monoterpènes et des phéromones sur le scolyte des cônes du pin blanc (Conophthorus coniperda (Schwarz)), le ravageur le plus destructeur des cônes et des graines du pin blanc (Pinus strobus L.) (Pinacées). Le limonène a été identifié comme un nouvel attractif et a un effet synergique lorsqu'il est ajouté au pityol, une phéromone sexuelle femelle. Plus le taux de libération de S-(–)-limonène augmentait, plus le nombre de captures dans les pièges était élevé. L'efficacité des énantiomères du limonène s'est avérée équivalente du point de vue du nombre moyen des captures dans les pièges. Le (–)-β-pinène n'était pas attractif et pourrait avoir un effet répulsif sur les deux sexes, et le (–)-α-pinène s'est révélé sans effet sur la réaction des femelles lorsqu'il était en mélange avec le pityol ou le pityol + S-(–)-limonène. Les phéromones trans-verbénol, trans-pinocarvéol et myrténol n'avaient aucun pouvoir attractif sur le C. coniperda.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 138 , Issue 5 , October 2006 , pp. 723 - 732
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Birgersson, G., DeBarr, G.L., de Groot, P., Dalusky, M.J., Pierce, H.D. Jr., Borden, J.H., Meyer, H., Francke, W., Espelie, K.E., and Berisford, C.W. 1995. Pheromones in white pine cone beetle, Conophthorus coniperda (Schwarz) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Journal of Chemical Ecology, 21: 143–167.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brauner, A. 2005. Semiochemical attractants to capture the white pine cone beetle, Conophthorus coniperda (Schwarz) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). M.Sc. thesis, Faculty of Forestry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario.Google Scholar
Dallara, P.L., Seybold, S.J., Meyer, H., Tolasch, T., Francke, W., and Wood, D.L. 2000. Semio-chemicals from three species of Pityophthorus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae): identification and field response. The Canadian Entomologist, 132: 889–906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeBarr, G.L., Barber, L.R., and Maxwell, A.H. 1982. Use of carbofuran for control of eastern white pine cone and seed insects. Forest Ecology and Management, 4: 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Groot, P. 1992. Biosystematics of Conophthorus Hopkins (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in eastern North America. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia.Google Scholar
de Groot, P., and DeBarr, G.L. 1998. Factors affecting the capture of the white pine cone beetle, Conophthorus coniperda (Schwarz) (Col., Scolytidae) in pheromone traps. Journal of Applied Entomology, 122: 281–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Groot, P., and DeBarr, G.L. 2000. Response of cone and twig beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) and a predator (Coleoptera: Cleridae) to pityol, conophthorin, and verbenone. The Canadian Entomologist, 132: 843–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Groot, P., DeBarr, G.L., Birgersson, G., Pierce, H.D., Borden, J.H., Berisford, Y.C., and Berisford, C.W. 1991. Evidence for a female-produced pheromone in the white pine cone beetle, Conophthorus coniperda (Schwarz), and in the red pine cone beetle, C. resinosae Hopkins (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). The Canadian Entomologist, 123: 1057–1064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Groot, P., DeBarr, G.L., and Birgersson, G. 1998. Field bioassays of synthetic pheromones and host monoterpenes for Conophthorus coniperda (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Environmental Entomology, 27: 382–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godwin, P.A., and Odell, T.M. 1965. The life history of the white pine cone beetle, Conophthorus coniperda. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 58: 213–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graber, R.E. 1964. Impact of the white-pine cone beetle on a pine seed orchard. Journal of Forestry, 62: 499–500.Google Scholar
Hedlin, A.F., Yates, H.O, Tovar, D.C., Ebel, B.H., Koerber, T.W., and Merkel, E.P. 1980. Cone and seed insects on North American conifers. Canadian Forest Service, Ottawa, Ontario, United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C., and Secretaría de Agriculture y Recursos Hidráulicos, Mexico.Google Scholar
Herdy, H. 1959. A method of determining the sex of adult bark beetles of the genus Conophthorus. Canadian Department of Agriculture, Forest Biology Division, Bi-monthly Progress Report 15: 1–2.Google Scholar
Kohnle, U., Densborn, S., Kölsch, P., Meyer, H., and Francke, W. 1992. E-7-Methyl-1,6-dioxaspiro[4.5]decane in the chemical communication of European Scolytidae and Nitulidae (Coleoptera). Journal of Applied Entomology, 114: 187–192.Google Scholar
Miller, D.R., Crowe, C.M., Asaro, C., and DeBarr, G.L. 2003. Dose and enantiospecific responses of white pine cone beetles, Conophthorus coniperda, to alpha-pinene in an eastern white pine seed orchard. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 29: 437–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, F.D., and Mailu, M. 1976. Behavior and generation dynamics of the white pine cone beetle Conophthorus coniperda (Schwarz) in central Wisconsin. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 69: 863–871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rappaport, N.G., Stein, J.D., del Rio Mora, A.A., DeBarr, G., de Groot, P., and Mori, S. 2000. Responses of Conophthorus spp. (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) to behavioral chemicals in field trials: a transcontinental perspective. The Canadian Entomologist, 132: 925–937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SPSS Inc. 1998. SYSTAT®. Version 9.0 for Windows [computer program]. SPSS Inc., Chicago.Google Scholar
SPSS Inc. 2000. SigmaPlot 2000 for Windows. Version 6.0 [computer program]. SPSS Inc., Chicago.Google Scholar
Systat Software Inc. 2004. SigmaStat for Windows. Version 3.10 [computer program]. Systat Software Inc., Richmond, California.Google Scholar
Trudel, R., Guertin, C., and de Groot, P. 2004. The use of pityol to reduce damage by the white pine cone beetle, Conophthorus coniperda (Col., Scolytidae) in seed orchards. Journal of Applied Entomology, 128: 403–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turgeon, J.J., and de Groot, P. 1992. Management of insect pests of cones in seed orchards in eastern Canada. Forestry Canada, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario.Google Scholar
Wade, D.D., DeBarr, G.L., Barber, L.R., and Manchester, E. 1989. Prescribed fire — a cost effective control for the white pine cone beetle. In Proceedings of the 10th Conference on Fire and Forest Meteorology, Ottawa, Ontario, 17–21 April 1989. Edited by MacIver, D.C., Auld, H., and Whitewood, R.. Forestry Canada, Ottawa, Ontario. pp. 117–121.Google Scholar
Welter, S.C. 2005. Codling moth. In Encyclopedia of insects. Edited by Resh, V.H. and Cardé, R.T.. Academic Press, New York. pp. 198–199.Google Scholar
Zar, J.H. 1999. Biostatistical analysis. 4th ed. Prentice-Hall Inc., Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.Google Scholar