Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-j4qg9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-11T22:08:52.778Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

FEMALE CERATITIS CAPITATA (DIPTERA: TEPHRITIDAE) CAPTURE IN A DRY TRAP BAITED WITH A FOOD-BASED SYNTHETIC ATTRACTANT IN AN ARGAN FOREST IN MOROCCO. PART I: LOW POPULATION FIELD TEST

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

A. Bakri ,
H. Hadis ,
N.D. Epsky ,
R.R. Heath  and
J. Hendrichs
A. Bakri*
Affiliation:
Unit of Biological Control of Insects, Faculty of Science Semlalia, University of Cadi Ayyad, Marrakech, Morocco.
H. Hadis
Affiliation:
Unit of Biological Control of Insects, Faculty of Science Semlalia, University of Cadi Ayyad, Marrakech, Morocco.
N.D. Epsky
Affiliation:
Center for Medical, Agricultural and Veterinary Entomology, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Gainesville, Florida, USA 32604
R.R. Heath
Affiliation:
Center for Medical, Agricultural and Veterinary Entomology, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Gainesville, Florida, USA 32604
J. Hendrichs
Affiliation:
Insect and Pest Control Section, International Atomic Energy Agency, P.O. Box 100, A-1040 Vienna, Austria.
*
1 Author to whom all correspondence should be addressed.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field tests were conducted in an argan forest in Morocco to evaluate the performance of a cylindrical dry trap and food-based synthetic attractant (FA) for monitoring the Mediterranean fruit fly (medfly), Ceratitis capitata (Weidemann). This female-targeted trapping system was compared with Jackson traps baited with trimedlure (TML), a male-targeted trapping system. TML-baited traps attracted significantly more males than FA-baited traps (91.4 ± 13.01 and 5.0 ± 0.75 males, respectively), and the FA-baited traps captured significantly more females than did TML-baited traps (9.3 ± 1.93 and 0.1 ± 0.04 females, respectively). For the first month of the field trial, the ratio of mature females to immature females captured in the FA-baited traps was approximately equal, but more immature females were captured in the second month. FA-baited traps were less specific and captured significantly more nontarget flies than did TML-baited traps.

Résumé

Au Maroc, dans la forêt d’argane, Argania spinosa (Linnée) (Sapotacea) a été effectué l’évaluation de la performance des pièges cylindriques avec un attractant à base alimentaire (FA) pour la détection et la surveillance de la mouche méditerranéenne des fruits Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann). Ces nouveaux pièges destinés à capturer les femelles sont comparés avec les pièges Jackson appâtés de Trimedlure (TML). Les pièges appâtés avec TML capturaient significativement plus de mâles que les pièges appâtés de FA (91,4 ± 13,01 et 5,0 ± 0,75 mâles, respectivement). Cependant, le pièges à FA capturaient plus de femelles que les pièges Jackson (9,3 ± 1,93 et 0,1 ± 0,04 femelles, respectivement). Durant le premier mois des expériences, le rapport des femelles matures – femelles immatures capturées par les pièges à appât alimentaire était approximativement égal à 1. Mais, d’avantage de femelles immatures ont été capturées dans le mois suivant. Les pièges à appât alimentaire étaient moins spécifiques que les pièges Jackson et capturaient significativement d’avantage plus de mouches non-cibles.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 130 , Issue 3 , June 1998 , pp. 349 - 356
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anonymous. 1989. Florida Fruit Fly Detection Manual. USDA, APHIS, PPQ and FL DACS, DPI, Gainesville, Florida.Google Scholar
Bakri, A. 1990. Chemical Ecology of the Mediterranean Fruit Fly Ceratitis capitata (Wied.): Interaction of Pheromone with Host-Plant Volatile. Ph.D. thesis, University of Southampton, Southampton, U.K.Google Scholar
Balachowsky, A. 1950. Sur l'origine de la mouche des fruits, Ceratitis capitata. Comptes Rendus de l'Academie d'Agriculture de France 36: 359.Google Scholar
Beroza, M., Green, N., Gertler, S.I., Steiner, L.F., and Miyashita, D.H.. 1961. Insect attractants: new attractants for the Mediterranean fruit fly. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 9: 361–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Box, G.E.P., Hunter, W.G., and Hunter, J.S.. 1978. Statistics for Experimenters. An Introduction to Design, Data Analysis, and Model Building. J. Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
Cunningham, R.T. 1989. Population detection. pp. 169–173in Robinson, A.S., and Hopper, G. (Eds.), World Crop Pests. Vol. 3B. Fruit Flies, Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control. Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Delrio, G., and Zumreoglu, A.. 1984. Attractability range and capture efficiency of medfly traps. pp. 445–450in Cavallero, R. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Commission of the European Communities – International Organization for Biological and Integrated Control International Symposium on Fruit Flies of Economic Importance, Greece, 16–19 Nov. 1982. A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, Boston.Google Scholar
Economopoulos, A.P. 1989. Use of traps based on color and (or) shape. pp. 315–327in Robinson, A.S., and Hooper, G. (Eds.), World Crop Pests. Vol. 3B. Fruit Flies, Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control. Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Epsky, N.D., Heath, R.R., Guzman, A., Dueben, B.D., Manukian, A., and Meyer, W.L.. 1995. Visual cue and chemical cue interactions in a dry trap with food-based synthetic attractant for the Mediterranean and the Mexican fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae). Environmental Entomology 24: 1387–1395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilmore, J.E. 1989. Sterile insect technique (SIT)—Overview. pp. 353–363in Robinson, A.S., and Hooper, G. (Eds.), World Crop Pests. Vol. 3B. Fruit Flies, Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control. Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Harris, E.J., Nakagawa, S., and Urago, T.. 1971. Sticky traps for detection and survey of three tephritids. Journal of Economic Entomology 64: 62–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, R.R., and Epsky, N.D.. 1995. Mediterranean fruit fly trap methodology. pp. 145–159in Morse, J.G., Metcalf, R.L., Carey, J.R., and Dowell, R.V. (Eds.), Proceedings: The Medfly in California: Defining Critical Research. University of California, Riverside.Google Scholar
Heath, R.R., Landolt, P.J., Tumlinson, J.H., Chambers, D.L., Murphy, R.E., Doolittle, R.E., Dueben, B.D., Sivinski, J., and Calkins, C.O.. 1991. Analysis, synthesis, formulation, and field testing of three major components of male Mediterranean fruit fly pheromone. Journal of Chemical Ecology 17: 1925–1940.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heath, R.R., Epsky, N.D., Guzman, A., Dueben, B.D., Manukian, A., and Meyer, W.L.. 1995. Development of a dry plastic insect trap with food-based synthetic attractant for the Mediterranean and the Mexican fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 88: 1307–1315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, R.R., Epsky, N.D., Dueben, B.D., and Meyer, W.L.. 1996. Systems to monitor and suppress Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae) populations. Florida Entomologist 79 (2): 144–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, M., Ohinata, K., Chambers, D.L., Jones, W.A., and Fujimoto, S.. 1973. Insect sex attractant. Isolation, identification and synthesis of sex pheromone of the male Mediterranean fruit fly. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 16 (3): 248–251.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jang, E.B., Light, D.M., Flath, R.B., Nagata, J.T., and Thomas, R.M.. 1989. Electroantennogram response of the Mediterranean fruit fly, Ceratitis capitata, to identified volatile constituents from calling males. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 50: 7–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landolt, P.J., Heath, R.R., and Chambers, D.L.. 1992. Oriented flight responses of female Mediterranean fruit flies to calling males, odor of calling males, and a synthetic pheromone blend. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 65: 259–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakagawa, S., Farias, G.J., and Steiner, L.F.. 1970. Response of female Mediterranean fruit flies to male lures in the relative absence of males. Journal of Economic Entomology 63: 227–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newell, W. 1936. Progress report on the Key West (Florida) fruit fly eradication project. Journal of Economic Entomology 29: 116–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robacker, D.C., and Warfield, W.C.. 1993. Attraction of both sexes of Mexican fruit fly, Anastrepha ludens, to a mixture of ammonia, methylamine, and putrescine. Journal of Chemical Ecology 19: 2999–3016.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sacantanis, K.B. 1957. La forêt d'arganier. Le plus grand foyer de Ceratitis capitata (Wied.) connu dans le monde. Bollettino del Laboratorio di Entomologia Agraria Portici 15: 1–53.Google Scholar
SAS Institute Inc. 1985. SAS/STAT Guide for Personal Computers, Version 6 Edition. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina.Google Scholar
Wakabayashi, N., and Cunningham, R.T.. 1991. Four-component synthetic food bait for attracting both sexes of the melon fly (Diptera: Tephritidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 84: 1672–1676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar