Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T16:06:59.505Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Features of the Lodgepole Needle Miner Parasite Complex in California

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Allan D. Telford
Allan D. Telford
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Control, University of California, Albany
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In the vicinity of Tuolumne Meadows, Yosemite National Park, California, an outbreak of the lodgepole needle miner, Evagora milleri (Busck), (new combination, Freeman 1960 = Recurvaria milleri Busck – Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae), continues unabated subsequent to its discovery in 1947. Although the outbreak is the third in this area since 1940, factors causing periodic increases and declines of E. milleri have not been determined. Climatic changes were found to have initiated and terminated an outbreak of an allied species, Evagora starki (Freeman), (new combination, Freeman 1960 = Recurvaria starki Freeman), on lodgepole pine in Canada (Stark 1959). However, an apparently sustained favorable climate at Yosemite, while perhaps capable of encouraging needle miner outbreaks cannot, as yet, be held responsible for their declines in this region.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 93 , Issue 5 , May 1961 , pp. 394 - 402
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1961

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blunk, H. 1944. Zur Kenntnis der Hyperparasiten von Pieris brassicae L. I. Beitrag: Mesochorus pectoralis Ratz. und seine Bedeutung für den Massenwechsel des Kohlweisslings. Zeit. angew. Ent. 30 (3): 418–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carolin, V. M., and Coulter, W. K.. 1958. The occurrence of insect parasites of Choristoneura fumiferana, (Clem.), in Oregon. Jour. Econ. Ent. 52 (4): 550–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, T. N. 1960. Needle-mining Lepidoptera of pine in North America. Canadian Ent. 92 (Suppl. 16): 1–51.Google Scholar
Imms, A. D. 1931. Recent advances in entomology. J. and A. Churchill, London, viii + 374 pp.Google Scholar
McLeod, J. H. 1951. Excerpt from the November, 1951, monthly report of the Biological Control Investigations Laboratory, Univ. British Columbia. 6 pp.Google Scholar
Muesebeck, C. F. W., and Dohanian, S. M.. 1927. A study of hyperparasitism with particular reference to the parasites of Apanteles melanoscelus (Ratzeburg). U.S. Dept. Agric., Dept. Bull. No. 1487, 35 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholson, A. J. 1933. The balance of animal populations. Jour. Animal Ecol. (Suppl.) 2 (1): 132–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholson, A. J. 1960. Personal correspondence.Google Scholar
Patterson, J. E. 1921. Life history of Recurvaria milleri, the lodgepole needle miner in Yosemite National Park, California. Jour. Agric. Res. 21 (3): 127–42.Google Scholar
Proper, A. B. 1933. Hyperparasitism in the case of some introduced lepidopterous tree defoliators. Jour. Agric. Res. 48(4): 359–76.Google Scholar
Schlinger, E. I. 1960. Diapausc and secondary parasites nullify the effectiveness of roseaphid parasites in Rircrside, Cahfornia, 1957–1958. Jour. Econ. Ent. 53 (1): 151–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stark, R. W. 1959. Population dynamics of the lodgepole needle miner, Recurvar starki Freeman, in Canadian Rocky Mountain Parks. Can. Jour. Zool. 37(6): 917–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Struble, G. R. 1958 Biology and ecology of the lodgepole needle miner. Progress report of research in 1957. U.S. Dept. Agric., Forest Ser., Calif. Forest and Range Exp. Sta. 54 pp. (processed, unpublished).Google Scholar
Struble, C. R., and Bedard, W. D.. 1958. Arthropod enemies of the lodgepole needle miner, Recurvaria milleri Busck (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). Pan-Pacific Ent. 34(4): 181–86.Google Scholar
Struble, G. R., and Martignoni, M. E.. 1959. Role of parasites and disease in controlling Recurvaria milleri Busck. Jour. Econ. Ent. 52 (3): 531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sweetman, H. L. 1958. The principles of biological control. Wm. C. Brown Co. Dubnque, Iowa. xii and 560 pp.Google Scholar
Telford, A. D. 1961. Jour. Econ. Ent. (In press).Google Scholar
Yuill, J. S. 1938. The lodgepole pine needle miner, Recurvaria milleri Busck. Life history and control studics in Yosemite National Park, California Season of 1937. U.S. Dept. Agric., Bur. Ent. and Plant Quar., Forest Insect Lab., Berkeley, 21 pp. (processed, unpublished).Google Scholar
Yuill, J. S. 1939. Life history and control of the lodgepole pine needle miner, Recurvaria milleri Busck in Yosemite National Park Season of 1938. U.S. Dept. Agric., Bur. Ent. and Plant Quarantine, Forest Insect Invest., Forest Insect Lab., Berkeley. 7 pp. (processed, unpublished).Google Scholar
Zwölfer, H., and Kraus, M.. 1957. Biocoenotic studies on the parasites of two fir- and two oak-tortricids. Entomophaga 2 (3): 173–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar