Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-qxsvm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-06T13:42:05.544Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

EVALUATION OF THE INSECT GROWTH REGULATORS METHOPRENE AND DIFLUBENZURON AGAINST FLOODWATER MOSQUITOES (DIPTERA: CULICIDAE) IN SOUTHWESTERN ONTARIO1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

C. S. Rodrigues
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
R. E. Wright
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1

Abstract

In field trials conducted at Guelph, Ont., methoprene (Altosid® SR-10) at 0.028 kg AI/ha (0.025 lb AI/ac) effectively controlled spring Aedes species following treatment of third- and fourth-instar larvae. However, when treated in the first to third instar, only partial control was obtained. The formulation remained active in the pools for 13 days during which time the average temperature was < 20°C. Methoprene also effectively controlled early-summer Aedes vexans (Meigen) after treatment of fourth-instar larvae. Diflubenzuron (Dimilin® 25% WP) at 0.022 kg AI/ha and 0.045 kg AI/ha (0.02 and 0.04 lb AI/ac) was effective against spring Aedes species following treatment of third-instar larvae.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baldwin, W. F. and Chant, C. D.. 1976. Tests of a growth regulator on mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) at Chalk River. Can. Ent. 108(11): 11531154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R. D. and Brust, R. A.. 1971. Field testing of insecticides used in mosquito control, and a description of the bioassay technique used in temporary pools. J. econ. Ent. 64: 1114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulla, M. S. and Darwazeh, H. A.. 1975 a. Evaluation of insect growth regulators against Psorophora confinnis (L-A) in southern California. Mosquito News 35(3): 281285.Google Scholar
Mulla, M. S. and Darwazeh, H. A.. 1975 b. Activity and longevity of insect growth regulators against mosquitoes. J. econ. Ent. 68(6): 791794.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mulla, M. S., Majori, G., and Darwazeh, H. A.. 1975. Effects of the insect growth regulator Dimilin® or TH-6040 on mosquitoes and some non-target organisms. Mosquito News 35(2): 211216.Google Scholar
Rathburn, C. B. Jr., and Boike, A. H. Jr., 1975. Laboratory and small plot field tests of Altosid® and Dimilin® for the control of Aedes taeniorhynchus and Culex nigripalpus larvae. Mosquito News 34(4): 540546.Google Scholar
Schaefer, C. H. and Dupras, E. F. Jr., 1973. Insect developmental inhibitors. 4. Persistence of ZR-515 in water. J. econ. Ent. 66: 923925.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schaefer, C. H., Miura, T., Mulligan, F. S. III, and Dupras, E. F. Jr., 1974 b. Insect development inhibitors: formulation research on Altosid®. Proc. Calif. Mosquito Control Assoc. 42: 140145.Google Scholar
Schaefer, C. H. and Wilder, W. H.. 1972. Insect developmental inhibitors: A practical evaluation as mosquito control agents. J. econ. Ent. 65(4): 10661071.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schaefer, C. H. and Wilder, W. H.. 1973. Insect developmental inhibitors. 2. Effects on target mosquito species. J. econ. Ent. 66: 913916.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schaefer, C. H., Wilder, W. H., Mulligan, F. S. III, and Dupras, E. F. Jr., 1974 a. Insect development inhibitors: effects of Altosid®, TH-6040 and H24108 against mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae). Proc. Calif. Mosquito Control Assoc. 42: 137139.Google Scholar
Steelman, C. D., Farlow, J. E., Breaud, T. P., and Schilling, P. E.. 1975. Effects of growth regulators on Psorophora columbiae (Dyar and Knab) and nontarget aquatic insect species in rice fields. Mosquito News 35(1): 6776.Google Scholar