Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:07:08.195Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

EVALUATION OF SEX ATTRACT ANT TRAPS FOR MONITORING SPRUCE BUDWORM POPULATIONS (LEPIDOPTERA: TORTRICIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

C. J. Sanders
C. J. Sanders
Affiliation:
Canadian Forestry Service, Great Lakes Forest Research Centre, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario P6A 5M7
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Four commercial sex attractant traps were evaluated for monitoring low density spruce budworm (Choristoneura fumiferana (Clem.)) populations. Factors considered were color, the number of male budworm caught, durability of traps and their ability to exclude non-target insects and debris. The Pherocon 1CP was superior to 3-M Brand Sectar 1 and XC-26; Pherocon 1C was least suitable. Interpretation of the numbers captured may be confounded by the fact that trapped males repel other males.

Résumé

L’auteur évalua l’efficacité de quatre pièges commerciaux munis d’attractifs sexuels pour suivre de près les faibles populations de la Tordeuse des bourgeons de l’Epinette (Choristoneura fumiferana (Clem.)). Les facteurs étudiés sont la couleur, le nombre des Tordeuses mâles piégées, la durabilité des pièges et leur capacité d’exclure les insectes non visés et les débris. Le Pherocon 1CP se révèle supérieur au 3-M Brand Sectar 1 et au XC-26; le Pherocon 1C se révèle le moins approprié. L’interprétation du nombre de captures peut être faussée par le fait que les mâles capturés repoussent d’autres mâles.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 110 , Issue 1 , 01 January 1978 , pp. 43 - 50
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1978

References

Bode, W. M., Asquith, D., and Tette, J. P.. 1973. Sex attractants and traps for tufted apple budmoth and redbanded leafroller moths. J. econ. Ent. 66: 1129–1130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzgerald, T. D., St. Clair, A. D., Daterman, G. E., and Smith, R. G.. 1973. Slow release plastic formulation of the cabbage looper pheromone cis-7-dodecenyl acetate: Release rate and biological activity. Environ. Ent. 2: 607–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howell, J. F. 1972. An improved sex attractant trap for codling moths. J. econ. Ent. 65: 609–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, G. G. 1975. Trap design and other factors influencing capture of male potato tuberworm moths by virgin female baited traps. J. econ. Ent. 68: 305–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, T. and Macauley, E. D. M.. 1976. Design and evaluation of sex-attractant traps for pea moth, Cydia nigricana (Steph.) and the effect of plume shape on catches. Ecol. Ent. 1: 175–187.Google Scholar
Madsen, H. F. and Vakenti, J. M.. 1973. The influence of trap design on the response of codling moth (Lepidoptera: Olethreutidae) and fruit tree leafroller (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) to synthetic attractants. J. ent. Soc. Br. Columb. 70: 5–8.Google Scholar
Miller, C. A. and McDougall, G. A.. 1973. Spruce budworm moth trapping using virgin females. Can. J. Zool. 51: 853–858.Google Scholar
Sanders, C. J. and Weatherston, J.. 1976. Sex pheromone of the eastern spruce budworm: Optimum blend of trans- and cis-11-tetradecenal. Can. Ent. 108: 1285–1290.Google Scholar
Starratt, A. N. and McLeod, D. G. R.. 1976. Influence of pheromone trap age on capture of the European corn borer. Environ. Ent. 5: 1008–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taschenberg, E. F., Carde, R. T., Hill, A., Tette, J. P., and Roelofs, W. L.. 1974. Sex pheromone trapping of the grapeberry moth. Environ. Ent. 3: 192–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weatherston, J., Roelofs, W.Comeau, A., and Sanders, C. J.. 1971. Studies of physiologically active arthropod secretions. X. Sex pheromone of the eastern spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Can. Ent. 103: 1741–1747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar