Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:21:24.007Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

EVALUATION OF PHEROMONE-BAITED TRAPS AND PHEROMONE LURE CONCENTRATIONS FOR MONITORING BLUEBERRY LEAFTIER (LEPIDOPTERA: TORTRICIDAE) POPULATIONS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Sridhar Polavarapu  and
William D. Seabrook
Sridhar Polavarapu
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada E3B 6E1
William D. Seabrook
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada E3B 6E1
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Six pheromone trap designs, including five high-capacily and a sticky trap, and four PVC lure concentrations of pheromone were evaluated for monitoring blueberry leaftier populations in six blueberry fields in Nova Scotia. Larval densities and subsequent male moth catches in the same year for all the trap designs evaluated, except double funnel traps, were highly correlated. Multipher III traps captured the highest number of moths, followed by Unitraps and double funnel traps. The ice cream container trap captured significantly fewer moths than any other trap design. At most locations, the first moth was caught on the same day in all the trap designs except the ice cream container trap. Trap catches increased with increasing pheromone concentration up to 0.03% dose. Traps baited with 0.3% lures captured significantly fewer moths than those with 0.003% or 0.03%. Based on mean trap catches, R2 values, coefficients of variation among traps, trap efficiency, and lure evaluations, the Unitraps baited with 0.003% lures are selected for further development of a population monitoring system for blueberry leaftier moths. The Multipher III traps baited with 0.03% lures captured up to 44 000 male moths (mean per trap per season) at high densities, demonstrating their potential in mass trapping blueberry leaftiers.

Résumé

Six types de pièges à phéromones, cinq de grande taille et un piège collant, et quatre concentrations (PVC) de phéromones ont été évalués comme outils d’estimation de populations de lieuses dans six champs de bleuets de Nouvel le-Écosse. La densité des larves et le nombre de mâles adultes capturés la même année étaient en très forte corrélation dans tous les types de pièges, sauf dans les pièges à entonnoir double. Ce sont les pièges Multipher III qui capturaient le plus grand nombre de papillons, puis les pièges Unitrap et enfin les pièges à entonnoir double. Le piège constitué d’un contenant de crème glacée capturait significativement moins de papillons que tout autre type de piège. À la plupart des endroits, les premiers papillons étaient capturés la même journée dans tous les pièges, sauf dans le piège «comenanl de crème glacée.» Le nombre de papillons capturés augmentait en fonction de la concentration de pheromone jusqu’à concurrence de 0,03%. Les pièges garnis de leurres 0,3% capturaient significativement moins de papillons que ceux garnis de concentrations de 0,003% ou de 0,03% de phéromone. D’après les nombres moyens de papillons capturés, les valeurs de R2. les coefficients de variations dans les pièges, l’efficacité des pièges et des concentrations de phéromone, ce sont les pièges Unitrap garnis de leurres 0,003% de phéromone qui conviennent le mieux lors de l’estimation des populations de Lieuses des bleuets. Les pièges Multipher III garnis de leurres 0,03% ont capturé jusqu’à 44 000 mâles (nombre moyen par piège par saison) dans des conditions de haute densité, ce qui en fait un piège bien adapté à la capture de nombres importants de Lieuses des bleuets.

[Traduit par la rédaction]

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 124 , Issue 5 , October 1992 , pp. 815 - 825
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baker, T.C., and Roelofs, W.L.. 1981. Initiation and termination of oriental fruit moth male response to pheromone concentrations in the field. Environmental Entomology 10: 211–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, M.W. 1984. Saturation of pheromone sticky traps by Platynota idaeusalis (Walker) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 77: 915–918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elkinton, J.S. 1987. Changes in the efficiency of the pheromone-baited milk-carton trap as it fills with male gypsy moths (Lepidoptera: Lymantridae). Journal of Economic Entomology 80: 754–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elkinton, J.S., and Childs, R.D.. 1983. Efficiency of two gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantridae) pheromone-baited traps. Environmental Entomology 12: 1519–1525.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, T.D., St. Clair, A.D., Daterman, G.E., and Smith, R.G.. 1973. Slow release plastic formulation of the cabbage looper pheromone, cis-7-dodecenyl acetate: Release rate and biological activity. Environmental Entomology 2: 607–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granett, J. 1973. A disparlure-baited box trap for capturing large numbers of gypsy moths. Journal of Economic Entomology 66: 359–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, G.G., Fogal, W.H., West, R.J., Slessor, K.N., and Miller, G.E.. 1989. A sex attractant for the spruce seed moth, Cydia strobilella (L.), and the effect of lure dosage and trap height on capture of male moths. The Canadian Entomologist 121: 691–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houseweart, M.W., Jennings, D.T., and Sanders, C.J.. 1981. Variables associated with pheromone traps for monitoring spruce budworm populations (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). The Canadian Entomologist 113: 527–537.Google Scholar
Lewis, T., and Macaulay, E.D.M.. 1976. Design and elevation of sex-attractant traps for pea moth, Cydia nigricana (Steph.) and the effect on plume shape on catches. Ecological Entomology 1: 175–186.Google Scholar
Lonergan, G.C., Ponder, B.M., Seabrook, W.D., and Kipp, L.R.. 1989. Sex pheromone components of the blueberry leaftier moth, Croesia curvalana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Journal of Chemical Ecology 15: 2495–2506.Google Scholar
Ponder, B.M., and Seabrook, W.D.. 1988. Biology of the blueberry leaftier Croesia curvalana (Kearfoot) (Tortricidae): A field and laboratory study. Journal of the Lepidopterists’ Society 42: 120–131.Google Scholar
Ponder, B.M., and Seabrook, W.D.. 1991. Sensitivity of the blueberry leaftier moths (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) (Kearfoot) to their own sex pheromone: Mating bioassay, electroantennogram, and trap attractancy studies. The Canadian Entomologist 123: 231–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramaswamy, S.B., and Cardé, R.T.. 1982. Nonsaturating traps and long-life attractant lures for monitoring spruce budworm males. Journal of Economic Entomology 75: 126–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, C.J. 1978. Evaluation of sex attractant traps for monitoring spruce budworm populations (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). The Canadian Entomologist 110: 43–50.Google Scholar
Sanders, C.J. 1981. Release rates and attraction of PVC lures containing synthetic sex attractant of the spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). The Canadian Entomologist 113: 103–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, C.J. 1986 a. Evaluation of high-capacity, nonsaturating sex pheromone traps for monitoring population densities of spruce budworm (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). The Canadian Entomologist 118: 611–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, C.J. 1986 b. Accumulated dead insects and killing agents reduce catches of spruce budworm (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) male moths in sex pheromone traps. Journal of Economic Entomology 79: 1351–1353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sweeney, J.D., McLean, J.A., and Shepherd, R.F.. 1990. Factors affecting catch in pheromone traps for monitoring the western spruce budworm, Choristoneura occidentalis Freeman. The Canadian Entomologist 122: 1119–1130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turgeon, J.J., McNeil, J.N., and Roelofs, W.L.. 1983. Field testing of various parameters for the development of a pheromone-based monitoring system for the armyworm, Pseudoletia unipuncta (Haworth) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Environmental Entomology 12: 891–894.Google Scholar
Vincent, C., Mailloux, M., and Hagley, E.A.C.. 1986. Nonsticky pheromone-baited traps for monitoring the spotted tentiform leafminer (Lepidoptera: Gracillaridae). Journal of Economic Entomology 79: 1666–1670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar