Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-03T19:37:58.512Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluating methods to detect and monitor North American larval parasitoids of the emerald ash borer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 March 2020

Justin M. Gaudon Open the ORCID record for Justin M. Gaudon [Opens in a new window] ,
D. Barry Lyons ,
Gene C. Jones ,
Jeremy D. Allison  and
Sandy M. Smith
Justin M. Gaudon*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Forestry, University of Toronto, 33 Willcocks Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 3B3, Canada
D. Barry Lyons
Affiliation:
Natural Resources Canada-Canadian Forest Service, Great Lakes Forestry Centre, 1219 Queen Street East, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, P6A 2E5, Canada
Gene C. Jones
Affiliation:
Natural Resources Canada-Canadian Forest Service, Great Lakes Forestry Centre, 1219 Queen Street East, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, P6A 2E5, Canada
Jeremy D. Allison
Affiliation:
Natural Resources Canada-Canadian Forest Service, Great Lakes Forestry Centre, 1219 Queen Street East, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, P6A 2E5, Canada
Sandy M. Smith
Affiliation:
Faculty of Forestry, University of Toronto, 33 Willcocks Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 3B3, Canada
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Populations of native North American parasitoids attacking Agrilus Curtis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) species have recently been considered as part of an augmentative biological control programme in an attempt to manage emerald ash borer, Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire, a destructive wood-boring beetle discovered in North America in 2002. We evaluate trapping methods to detect and monitor populations of two important native larval parasitoids, Phasgonophora sulcata Westwood (Hymenoptera: Chalcididae) and Atanycolus Förster (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) species, attacking emerald ash borer in its introduced range. We found that purple prism traps captured more P. sulcata than green prism traps, yellow pan traps, and log samples and thus were considered better for detecting and monitoring P. sulcata populations. Trap type did not affect the number of captures of Atanycolus species. Surprisingly, baiting prism traps with a green leaf volatile or manuka oil did not significantly increase captures of P. sulcata or Atanycolus species. Based on these results, unbaited purple prism traps would be optimal for sampling these native emerald ash borer parasitoids in long-term management programmes.

Type
Scientific Notes
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 152 , Issue 3 , June 2020 , pp. 389 - 398
Copyright
© 2020 Entomological Society of Canada. Parts of this are a work of Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

Present addresses: School of Environment, Resources and Sustainability, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, Ontario, N2L 3G1, Canada; rare Charitable Research Reserve, 1679 Blair Road, Cambridge, Ontario, N3H 4R8, Canada.

Subject editor: Therese Poland

References

Aguiar, A.P. and Santos, B.F. 2010. Discovery of potent, unsuspected sampling disparities for Malaise and Möricke traps, as shown for Neotropical Cryptini (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae). Journal of Insect Conservation, 14: 199–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, J.D. and Redak, R.A. 2017. The impact of trap type and design features on survey and detection of bark and woodboring beetles and their associates: a review and meta-analysis. Annual Review of Entomology, 62: 127–146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allison, J.D., Strom, B., Sweeney, J., and Mayo, P. 2019. Trap deployment along linear transects perpendicular to forest edges: impact on capture of longhorned beetles (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Journal of Pest Science, 92: 299–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartelt, R.J., Cossé, A.A., Zilkowski, B.W., and Fraser, I. 2007. Antennally active macrolide from the emerald ash borer Agrilus planipennis emitted predominately by females. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 33: 1299–1302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, L.S., Duan, J.J., Gould, J.R., and Van Driesche, R. 2015. Progress in the classical biological control of Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) in North America. The Canadian Entomologist, 147: 300–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burr, S.J., McCullough, D.G., and Poland, T.M. 2018. Density of emerald ash borer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) adults and larvae at three stages of the invasion wave. Environmental Entomology, 47: 121–132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cappaert, D. and McCullough, D.G. 2009. Occurrence and seasonal abundance of Atanycolus cappaerti (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) a native parastioid of emerald ash borer, Agrilus planipennisi (Coleoptera: Buprestidae). Great Lakes Entomologist, 42: 16–29.Google Scholar
Cappaert, D., McCullough, D.G., Poland, T.M., and Siegert, N.W. 2005. Emerald ash borer in North America: a research and regulatory challenge. American Entomologist, 51: 152–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chénier, J.V.R. and Philogène, B.J.R. 1989. Evaluation of three trap designs for the capture of conifer-feeding beetles and other forest Coleoptera. The Canadian Entomologist, 121: 159–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crook, D.J., Khrimian, A., Cossé, A., Fraser, I., and Mastro, V.C. 2012. Influence of trap color and host volatiles on capture of the emerald ash borer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae). Journal of Economic Entomology, 105: 429–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darling, D.C. and Packer, L. 1988. Effectiveness of Malaise traps in collecting Hymenoptera: the influence of trap design, mesh size, and location. The Canadian Entomologist, 120: 787–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derocles, S.A., Plantegenest, M., Ait-Ighil, E.E.T., Chaubet, B., Dedryver, C.A., and Le Ralec, A. 2014. Larval hitch-hiking and adult flight are two ways of Aphidiinae parasitoids long-range dispersal. Environmental Entomology, 43: 1327–1332.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duan, J.J., Bauer, L.S., Abell, K.J., Lelito, J.P., and Van Driesche, R. 2013. Establishment and abundance of Tetrastichus planipennisi (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) in Michigan: potential for success in classical biocontrol of the invasive emerald ash borer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae). Journal of Economic Entomolology, 106: 1145–1154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flaherty, L., Sweeney, J.D., Pureswaran, D., and Quiring, D.T. 2011. Influence of host tree condition on the performance of Tetropium fuscum (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Environmental Entomology, 40: 1200–1209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaudon, J.M. 2019. Natural enemies of wood-boring beetles in northeastern temperate forests and implications for biological control of the emerald ash borer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) in North America. PhD thesis. University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Available from http://hdl.handle.net/1807/95858 [accessed 3 February 2020].Google Scholar
Gaudon, J.M., Allison, J.D., and Smith, S.M. 2018. Factors affecting the dispersal of a native parasitoid, Phasgonophora sulcata, attacking the emerald ash borer: implications for biological control. BioControl, 63: 751–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaudon, J.M. and Smith, S.M. 2019. Augmentation of native North American natural enemies for the biological control of the introduced emerald ash borer in central Canada. BioControl, 65: 71–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-019-09986-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooie, N.A., Wiggins, G.J., Lambdin, P.L., Grant, J.F., Powell, S.D., and Lelito, J.P. 2015. Native parasitoids and recovery of Spathius agrili from areas of release against emerald ash borer in eastern Tennessee, USA. Biocontrol Science and Technology, 25: 345–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennings, D.E., Duan, J.J., and Shrewsbury, P.M. 2018. Comparing methods for monitoring establishment of the emerald ash borer (Agrilus planipennis, Coleoptera: Buprestidae) egg parasitoid Oobius agrili (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) in Maryland, USA. Forests, 9: 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindgren, B.S. 1983. A multiple funnel trap for scolytid beetles (Coleoptera). The Canadian Entomologist, 115: 299–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyons, D.B. 2010. Biological control of emerald ash borer. In Guiding principles for managing the emerald ash borer in urban environments. Edited by Lyons, D.B. and Scarr, T.A.. Natural Resources Canada and Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Burlington, Ontario, Canada. Pp. 29–34.Google Scholar
McCravy, K.W. 2018. A review of sampling and monitoring methods for beneficial arthropods in agroecosystems. Insects, 9: 1–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paiero, S.M., Jackson, M., Jewiss-Gaines, A., Kimoto, T., Gill, B.D., and Marshall, S.A. 2012. Field guide to the jewel beetles (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) of northeastern North America. Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
Parisio, M.S., Gould, J.R., Vandenberg, J.D., Bauer, L.S., and Fierke, M.K. 2017. Evaluation of recovery and monitoring methods for parasitoids released against emerald ash borer. Biological Control, 106: 45–53.10.1016/j.biocontrol.2016.12.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, P.W. 1971. A comparison of four methods for sampling adult populations of cocoon parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). Canadian Journal of Zoology, 49: 513–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Development Core Team 2018. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available from www.r-project.org [accessed 3 February 2020].Google Scholar
Roscoe, L.E. 2014. Phasgonophora sulcata Westwood (Hymenoptera: Chalcididae): a potential augmentative biological control agent for the invasive Agrilus planipennis (Fairmaire) (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) in Canada. PhD thesis. University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Available from http://hdl.handle.net/1807/68407 [accessed 3 February 2020].Google Scholar
Shibata, E. 2000. Bark borer Semanotus japonicus (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) utilization of Japanese cedar Cryptomeria japonica: a delicate balance between primary and secondary insect. Journal of Applied Entomology, 124: 279–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ulyshen, M.D. and Sheehan, T.N. 2019. Trap height considerations for detecting two economically important forest beetle guilds in southeastern US forests. Journal of Pest Science, 92: 253–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture. 2015. Emerald ash borer biological control release and recovery guidelines. United States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Forest Service, Agricultural Research Service, Riverdale, Maryland, United States of America. Available from www.aphis.usda.gov/plant_health/plant_pest_info/emerald_ash_b/downloads/EAB-FieldRelease-Guidelines.pdf [accessed 3 February 2020].Google Scholar
Van Driesche, R.G. and Bellows, T.S. 1996. Biological control. Chapman and Hall, New York, New York, United States of America.CrossRefGoogle Scholar