Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:17:47.810Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

EMERGENCE OF CADDISFLIES (TRICHOPTERA) AND MAYFLIES (EPHEMEROPTERA) FROM HEMING LAKE, MANITOBA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

John F. Flannagan  and
G. H. Lawler
John F. Flannagan
Affiliation:
Freshwater Institute, Fisheries Research Board of Canada, Winnipeg, Manitoba
G. H. Lawler
Affiliation:
Freshwater Institute, Fisheries Research Board of Canada, Winnipeg, Manitoba
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Forty-nine 0.1 m2 emergence traps positioned over several substrate types and a range of water depths 0.9 to 5.5 m, from 2 June to 7 September 1967, collected 979 caddisflies and 195 mayflies. The caddisfly emergence was restricted to the period 24 June −27 August, and mayfly emergence to the period 2–30 July.The sex ratio for the caddisflies showed, in almost every case, a preponderance of females and no male Neureclipsis bimaculatus (Linn.) and N. validus Walk, were collected. Most of the caddisflies showed preference for a particular depth and/or substrate type. The few caddisflies which were present both in large numbers and distributed over a fairly wide depth range indicated that there is a relationship between depth distribution (temperature) and emergence time, heat perhaps being involved both in control of rate of maturation and as a releasing agent for the actual emergence.Male Stenonema interpunctatum canadense (Walker) showed peak emergence about 5 days before the females and also outnumbered the females by about 3:1. No relationship seemed to exist between depth distribution and emergence time for any of the mayfly species. However, the emergence of one species, Caenis forcipata (McD.) may be related to weather conditions.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 104 , Issue 2 , February 1972 , pp. 173 - 183
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Badcock, Ruth M. 1953. Observations of oviposition under water of the aerial insect Hydropsyche angustipennis (Curtis) (Trichoptera). Hydrobiologia 5(102): 222–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brinkhurst, R. O. 1967. Sampling the benthos. Great Lakes Inst. Progr. Rep. 32, 7 pp. Univ. of Toronto, Ont.Google Scholar
Burks, B. D. 1953. The mayflies, or Ephemeroptera of Illinois. Bull. Ill. St. Nat. Hist. Surv., No. 26(1) pp. 1–216, Figs. 1–395.Google Scholar
Clemens, W. A. 1915. Life histories of Georgian Bay Ephemeridae of the genus Heptagenia. Contrib. Can. Biol., Sessional Pap. 39b: 131–143.Google Scholar
Fremling, C. R. 1960. Biology and possible control of nuisance caddisflies of the upper Mississippi River. Bull. St. Univ. Iowa, No. 483.Google Scholar
Grandilewskaja-Decksbach, M. L. 1935. Mateiralien zur Chironomidentriologie verschiedenet Beckem. Zur Frage Über die Schwankungen der Anzahl und der Biomasse der Chironomidenlarven. Trudy Limnol. Stn Kosine 19: 145–182.Google Scholar
Guyer, G. and Hutson, R.. 1955. A comparison of sampling techniques utilized in an ecological study of aquatic insects. J. econ. Ent. 48(8): 662–665.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G. Evelyn. 1967. A treatise on limnology, 1. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Hamilton, A. L. An analysis of a freshwater benthic community with special reference to the chironomidae. Ph.D. Thesis (1965), Univ. of British Columbia, 94 pp.Google Scholar
Hora, S. H. 1930. Ecology, binomics and evolution of torrential fauna, with special reference to the organs of attachment. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. (B) 218: 171–282.Google Scholar
Ide, F. P. 1930. Contributions to the biology of Ontario mayflies with descriptions of new species. Can. Ent. 62: 204–213, 218–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Judd, W. W. 1953. A study of the population of insects emerging as adults from the Dundas Marsh, Hamilton, Ontario, during 1948. Am. Midl. Nat. 49: 801–824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimerle, R. A. and Anderson, N. H.. 1967. Evaluation of aquatic insect emergence traps. J. econ. Ent. 60(5): 1255–1259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawler, G. H. 1963. The biology and taxonomy of the burbot, Lota lota, in Heming Lake, Manitoba. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 20(2): 417–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawler, G. H. 1965. The food of the pike, Esox lucius, in Heming Lake, Manitoba, and two adjacent lakes. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 15(2): 203–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawler, G. H. 1966. Pugheadedness in perch, Perca flavescens and pike Esox lucius, of Heming Lake, Manitoba. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 23(11): 1807–1809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawler, G. H. and Watson, N. H. F.. 1958. Limnological studies of Heming Lake, Manitoba, and two adjacent lakes. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 15(2): 203–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, N. C., Waddell, A. B., and Hall, W. B.. 1963. A comparison of the catches of emerging aquatic insects in floating box and submerged funnel traps. J. Anim. Ecol. 32: 203–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mundie, J. H. 1956. Emergence traps for aquatic insects. Mitt. int. ver. Limnol. 7: 1–13.Google Scholar
Neave, F. 1932. A study of the mayflies (Hexagenia) of Lake Winnipeg. Contr. Can. Biol. Fish. 7(15): 177–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neave, F. 1934. A contribution to the aquatic insect fauna of Lake Winnipeg. Int. Rev. ges. Hydrobiol. Hydrogr. 31: 157–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Needham, J. G., Travers, J. R., Hsu, Yin-Chi, et al. 1935. The biology of mayflies. Comstock, Ithaca, N.Y.Google Scholar
Ross, H. H. 1944. The caddisflies, or Trichoptera of Illinois. Bull. Ill. St. nat. Hist. Surv. 23(1): 1–326.Google Scholar
Slack, H. D. 1957. The fauna of the lake, pp. 33–48. In Studies of Loch Lomond, Vol. 1. Blackie, Glasgow.Google Scholar
Watson, N. H. F. 1963. Summer food of lake whitefish (Coregonus clupeaformis Mitchell), from Heming Lake, Manitoba. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 20(2): 279–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittaker, R. H. and Fairbanks, C. W.. 1958. A study of plankton copepod communities in the Columbia Basin, southeastern Washington. Ecology 39(1): 46–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar