Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T17:34:43.631Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of soil preparation, food availability, and temperature on survival of Agriotes obscurus (Coleoptera: Elateridae) larvae in storage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2016

Wim van Herk ,
Bob Vernon ,
Alison Perry ,
Kathryn Ryan  and
Andrea Chee
Wim van Herk*
Affiliation:
Pacific Agri-Food Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, P.O. Box 1000 Agassiz, British Columbia, V0M 1A0, Canada
Bob Vernon
Affiliation:
Pacific Agri-Food Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, P.O. Box 1000 Agassiz, British Columbia, V0M 1A0, Canada
Alison Perry
Affiliation:
Pacific Agri-Food Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, P.O. Box 1000 Agassiz, British Columbia, V0M 1A0, Canada
Kathryn Ryan
Affiliation:
Pacific Agri-Food Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, P.O. Box 1000 Agassiz, British Columbia, V0M 1A0, Canada
Andrea Chee
Affiliation:
Pacific Agri-Food Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, P.O. Box 1000 Agassiz, British Columbia, V0M 1A0, Canada
*
1 Corresponding author (e-mail: [email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field collected wireworms (Coleoptera: Elateridae) intended for laboratory studies often die during storage from Metarhizium Sorokin (Clavicipitaceae) infection and other causes. To determine optimal storage conditions for Agriotes obscurus (Linnaeus), freshly collected larvae were stored in regular and sterilised soil, with and without access to food (potato slices), at 12 °C and 16 °C, for six months to determine which conditions resulted in the lowest wireworm mortality. Survival was highest when wireworms were stored in sterilised soil, at 12 °C, in the absence of food. Food availability increased wireworm mortality from Metarhizium infection and other causes, but decreased the number of missing wireworms. Wireworm weight change during the study was highest in treatments where wireworms had access to food. The expected effect of food deprivation on wireworm energetic state and immune response are discussed in context with these findings.

Type
Behaviour & Ecology - NOTE
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 148 , Issue 6 , December 2016 , pp. 698 - 702
Copyright
© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Subject editor: Justin Schmidt

References

Arrese, E.L. and Soulages, J.L. 2010. Insect fat body: energy, metabolism, and regulation. Annual Review of Entomology, 55: 207–225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eidt, D.C. 1958. Anatomy and histology of the full-grown larva of Ctenicera aeripennis destructor (Brown) (Coleoptera: Elateridae). Canadian Journal of Zoology, 36: 317–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ericsson, J.D., Kabaluk, J.T., Goettel, M.S., and Myers, J.H. 2007. Spinosad interacts synergistically with the insect pathogen Metarhizium anisopliae against the exotic wireworms Agriotes lineatus and Agriotes obscurus (Coleoptera: Elateridae). Journal of Economic Entomology, 100: 31–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evans, A.C. and Gough, H.C. 1942. Observations on some factors influencing growth in wireworms of the genus Agriotes Esch. Annals of Applied Biology, 29: 168–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillespie, J.P., Bailey, A.M., Cobb, B., and Vilcinskas, A. 2000. Fungi as elicitors of insect immune responses. Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology, 44: 49–68.3.0.CO;2-F>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gillespie, J.P., Kanost, M.R., and Trenczek, T. 1997. Biological mediators of insect immunity. Annual Review of Entomology, 42: 611–643.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoffmann, J.A. 1995. Innate immunity of insects. Current Opinion in Immunology, 7: 4–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
James, H.C. 1927. On the pair of so-called sensory pits of the ninth abdominal segment of the wireworm (Agriotes obscurus Lin.) with additional notes on the internal anatomy. Annals of Applied Biology, 14: 470–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kabaluk, J.T. and Ericsson, J.D. 2007. Environmental and behavioral constraints on the infection of wireworms by Metarhizium anisopliae . Environmental Entomology, 36: 1415–1420.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kabaluk, T., Janmaat, A., Sheedy, C., Goettel, M., and Noronha, C. 2013. Agriotes spp. L., wireworms and click beetles (Coleoptera: Elateridae). In Biological Control Programmes in Canada 2001–2012. Edited by P.G. Mason and D.R. Gillespie. CABI, Wallingford, United Kingdom. Pp. 72–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, C.A. 1940. The biology and control of wireworms: a review of the literature. Bulletin of the Pennsylvania State College School of Agriculture and Experiment Station, 392: 1–90.Google Scholar
van Herk, W.G. and Vernon, R.S. 2011. Mortality of Metarhizium anisopliae-infected wireworms (Coleoptera: Elateridae) and feeding on wheat seedlings are affected by wireworm weight. Journal of the Entomological Society of British Columbia, 108: 38–40.Google Scholar
van Herk, W.G. and Vernon, R.S. 2013a. Wireworm damage to wheat seedlings: effect of temperature and wireworm state. Journal of Pest Science, 86: 63–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Herk, W.G. and Vernon, R.S. 2013b. Categorization and numerical assessment of wireworm mobility over time following exposure to bifenthrin. Journal of Pest Science, 86: 115–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vernon, R.S. and van Herk, W.G. 2012. Wireworms as pests of potato. In Insect pests of potato: global perspectives on biology and management. Edited by P. Giordanengo, C. Vincent, and A. Alyokhin. Academic Press, Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Pp. 103–164.Google Scholar
Zacharuk, R.Y. 1971. Ultrastructural changes in tissues of larval Elateridae (Coleoptera) infected with the fungus Metarrhizium anisopliae . Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 17: 281–289.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed