Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:15:43.291Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

EFFECTS OF LOW RATES OF PREDATION ON SELECTED LIFE-HISTORY CHARACTERISTICS OF PODISUS MACULIVENTRIS (SAY) (HETEROPTERA: PENTATOMIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Robert N. Wiedenmann  and
Robert J. O’Neil
Robert N. Wiedenmann
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA 47907
Robert J. O’Neil
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA 47907
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Reproductive and survival patterns of the heteropteran predator Podisus maculiventris (Say) (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) were measured under low prey inputs. A single prey, mealworm larva (Tenebrio molitor L.), of one of two sizes (120 or 30 mg), was given to predators for a 24-h period every 1, 2, 4, 8, or 16 days. Additional treatments included: predators provided prey in excess of attack rates; predators given no food; and predators given green bean slices only. Results showed that predators provided with prey survived regardless of feeding interval. When given large prey, predators showed reproductive patterns that were not clearly reflective of feeding interval; only predators fed at 8- and 16-day intervals showed reduced fecundity. When given small prey, the reproductive patterns of predators clearly reflected the feeding intervals. Predators that were fed less frequently laid fewer eggs, less often, and later in life.

Résumé

La capacité reproductrice et les patrons de survie du prédateur Podisus maculiventris (Say) (Heteroptera : Pentatomidae) ont été évalués sous des conditions de faible prédation. Les prédateurs se sont vus donner une seule proie (une larve de Tenebrio molitor L. de 30 ou 120 mg) pendant une période de 24 h à tous les 1, 2, 4, 8 ou 16 jours. Dans d’autres traitements, les prédateurs se sont vus offrir un excès de proies ou seulement des tranches de haricot vert ou aucune nourriture. Les prédateurs nourris de proies ont tous survécu, quelque soit l’intervalle entre les repas. Lorsque les prédateurs ont été nourris de grosses proies, leurs patrons de reproduction n’ont pas reflété clairement l’intervalle entre les repas; seulement les prédateurs nourris à des intervalles de 8 et 16 jours ont subi une baisse de fécondité. Chez des prédateurs nourris de petites proies, les patrons de reproduction ont bien réflété l’intervalle entre les repas; les prédateurs qui ont été nourris moins fréquemment ont pondu moins d’oeufs, moins souvent et plus tard dans leur vie.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 122 , Issue 2 , April 1990 , pp. 271 - 283
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, J.F. 1974. Responses to starvation in the spiders Lycosa lenta Hentz and Filistata hibernalis (Hentz). Ecology 55: 576–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baars, M.A., and van Dijk, T.S.. 1984. Population dynamics of two carabid beetles at a Dutch heathland. II. Egg production and survival in relation to density. J. Anim. Ecol. 53: 389–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beddington, J.R., Hassell, M.P., and Lawton, J.H.. 1976. The components of arthropod predation. II. The predator rate of increase. J. Anim. Ecol. 45: 165–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calow, P. 1973. The relationship between fecundity, phenology, and longevity: a systems approach. Am. Nat. 107: 559–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dean, J.M. 1981. The relationship between lifespan and reproduction in the grasshopper Melanoplus. Oecologia 48: 385–388.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dietz, L.L., Rabb, R.L., Van Duyn, J.W., Brooks, W.M., Bradley, J.R. Jr., and Stinner, R.E.. 1980. A guide to the identification and biology of soybean arthropods in North Carolina. North Carolina State Tech. Bull. 238. 264 pp.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, R.M., Hurd, L.E., and Bartley, J.A.. 1981. Ecological consequences of food limitation for adult mantids (Tenodera ardifolia sinensis Saussure). Am. Midl. Nat. 106: 209–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, H.F. 1976. The effect of prey density and host plant characteristics on oviposition and fertility in Anthocoris confusus (Reuter). Ecol. Ent. 1: 157–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eveleigh, E.S., and Chant, D.A.. 1981. Experimental studies on acarine predator-prey interactions: the numerical response of immature and adult predators (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Can. J. Zool. 59: 1407–1418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutierrez, A.P., Baumgaertner, J.U., and Hagen, K.S.. 1981. A conceptual model for growth, development, and reproduction in the ladybird beetle, Hippodamia convergens (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Can. Ent. 113: 21–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassell, M.P. 1978. The Dynamics of Arthropod Predator–Prey Systems. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ. 237 pp.Google ScholarPubMed
Law, R. 1979. The cost of reproduction in an annual meadow grass. Am. Nat. 109: 453–464.Google Scholar
Lawton, J.H. 1971. Maximum and actual field feeding-rates in larvae of the damselfly Pyrrhosoma nymphula (Sulzer) (Odonata: Zygoptera). Freshwater Biol. 1: 99–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenski, R.E. 1984. Food limitation and competition: a field experiment with two Carabus species. J. Anim. Ecol. 53: 203–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsura, T., and Morooka, K.. 1983. Influences of prey density on fecundity in a mantis, Paratenodera angustipennis (S.). Oecologia 56: 306–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McPherson, J.E. 1982. The Pentatomoidea (Hemiptera) of Northeastern North America. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale and Edwardsville, IL. 240 pp.Google Scholar
Mertz, D.B. 1975. Senescent decline in flour beetle strains selected for early adult fitness. Physiol. Zool. 48: 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, R.F. 1963. The effect of predator age and prey defense on the functional response of Podisus maculiventris Say to the density of Hyphantria cunea Drury. Can. Ent. 95: 1009–1020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mukerji, M.K., and LeRoux, E.J.. 1965. Laboratory rearing of a Quebec strain of the pentatomid predator, Podisus maculiventris (Say) (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). Phytoprotect. 46: 40–60.Google Scholar
Mukerji, M.K., and LeRoux, E.J.. 1969 a. A quantitative study of food consumption and growth of Podisus maculiventris (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). Can. Ent. 101: 387–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mukerji, M.K., and LeRoux, E.J.. 1969 b. A study on energetics of Podisus maculiventris (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). Can. Ent. 101: 449–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murdoch, W.W. 1966. Population stability and life history phenomena. Am. Nat. 100: 5–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Neil, R.J. 1988 a. Predation by Podisus maculiventris (Say) on Mexican bean beetle, Epilachna varivestis Mulsant, in Indiana soybeans. Can. Ent. 120: 161–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Neil, R.J. 1988 b. A model of predation by Podisus maculiventris (Say) on Mexican bean beetle, Epilachna varivestis Mulsant, in soybeans. Can. Ent. 120: 601–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Neil, R.J., and Wiedenmann, R.N.. 1987. Adaptations of arthropod predators to agricultural systems. Fla. Ent. 70: 40–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Neil, R.J., and Wiedenmann, R.N.. 1990. Body weight of Podisus maculiventris (Say) under various feeding regimens. Can. Ent. 122: 285–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pimentel, D., and Wheeler, A.G. Jr., 1973. Species and diversity of arthropods in the alfalfa community. Environ. Ent. 2: 659–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quiring, D.T., and McNeil, J.N.. 1984. Influence of intraspecific larval competition and mating on the longevity and reproductive performance of females of the leaf miner Agromyza frontella (Rondani) (Diptera: Agromyzidae). Can. J. Zool. 62: 2197–2200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richman, D.B., Hemenway, R.C., and Whitcomb, W.H.. 1980. Field cage evaluation of predators of the soybean looper, Pseudoplusia includens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Environ. Ent. 9: 315–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricklefs, R.E. 1973. Ecology. Chiron, Portland, OR. 861 pp.Google Scholar
Snell, T.W., and King, C.E.. 1977. Lifespan and fecundity patterns in rotifers: the cost of reproduction. Evolution 31: 882–890.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sota, T. 1984. Long adult life span and polyphagy of a carabid beetle, Leptocarabus kamagaii, in relation to reproduction and survival. Res. Popul. Ecol. 26: 389–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takafuji, A., and Chant, D.A.. 1976. Comparative studies of two species of predacious phytoseiid mites (Acarina: Phytoseiidae), with special reference to their responses to the density of their prey. Res. Popul. Ecol. 17: 255–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tallamy, D.W., and Denno, R.F.. 1982. Life history trade-offs in Gargaphia solani (Hemiptera: Tingidae): the cost of reproduction. Ecology 63: 616–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Dijk, T.S. 1979. On the relationship between reproduction, age and survival in two carabid beetles: Calathus melanocephalus L. and Pterostichus coerulescens L. (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Oecologia 40: 63–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waddill, V., and Shepard, M.. 1975. A comparison of predation by the pentatomids, Podisus maculiventris (Say) and Stiretus anchorago (F.), on the Mexican bean beetle, Epilachna varivestis Mulsant. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 68: 1023–1027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, L.O., and Wallis, W.G.. 1971. Biology of the spined soldier bug, Podisus maculiventris (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). J. Ga. ent. Soc. 6: 109–116.Google Scholar
Wise, D. 1975. Food limitation of the spider Lyniphia marginata: experimental field studies. Ecology 56: 637–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wise, D. 1979. Effects of an experimental increase in prey abundance upon the reproductive rates of two orbweaving spider species (Araneae: Araneidae). Oecologia 41: 289–300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed