Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:14:30.490Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

EFFECTS OF HONEY BEE (APIS MELLIFERA L.) QUEEN MANDIBULAR GLAND PHEROMONE ON FORAGING AND BROOD REARING

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Heather A. Higo ,
Simon J. Colley ,
Mark L. Winston  and
Keith N. Slessor
Heather A. Higo
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada V5A 1S6
Simon J. Colley
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada V5A 1S6
Mark L. Winston
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada V5A 1S6
Keith N. Slessor
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry/Biochemistry, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada V5A 1S6
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We investigated the effects of synthetic honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) queen mandibular gland pheromone on colony foraging and brood rearing. Colonies newly established in the spring showed a significant, dose-dependent increase in the number of foragers gathering pollen, and individual pollen foragers returned to the nest with larger pollen loads. These two effects combined resulted in a doubling of the amount of pollen brought into colonies by foraging bees. Brood rearing also increased, but not significantly. In contrast, large, established colonies showed no effects at their summer population peak. We conclude that queen mandibular pheromone can significantly affect foraging, but its effects depend on colony conditions and environmental factors.

Résumé

Nous avons examiné les effets de la phéromone synthétique de la glande mandibulaire de la reine d’abeille domestique (Apis mellifera L.) sur le butinage et l’élevage des couvains. Dans des colonies nouvellement établies, le nombre de butineuses ramassant du pollen a augmenté d’une façon significative suivant l’augmentation de la dose, et les butineuses retournaient au nid avec de plus grandes charges de pollen. La combinaison de ces deux effets démontre un doublement de la quantité de pollen apporté dans les colonies par les butineuses. L’élevage des couvains a aussi augmenté, mais cette augmentation ne s’avère pas significative. Par contraste, dans les colonies déjà établies, aucun effet significatif a été observé lors du pic de population d’été. Nous concluons donc que la phéromone de la glande mandibulaire peut avoir des effets significatifs sur le butinage, mais ces effets dépendent de la condition des colonies et des facteurs environnementaux.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 124 , Issue 2 , April 1992 , pp. 409 - 418
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Al-Tikrity, W.S., Benton, A.W., Hillman, R.C., and Clarke, W.W. Jr, 1972. The relationship between the amount of unsealed brood in honeybee colonies and their pollen collection. J. Apic. Res. 11(1): 9–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, M.D., and Jeffree, E.P.. 1956. The influence of stored pollen and of colony size on the brood rearing of honeybees. Ann. appl. Biol. 44(4): 649–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker, R.J. 1971. The influence of food inside the hive on pollen collection. J. Apic. Res. 10: 23–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgett, M., and Burikam, I.. 1985. Number of adult honey bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) occupying a comb: A standard for estimating colony populations. J. econ. Ent. 78: 1154–1156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, C. 1990. Colony state and individual foraging strategies in the honey bee, Apis mellifera. M.Sc. thesis, Simon Fraser University, B.C. pp. 29–30.Google Scholar
Fewell, J.H., and Winston, M.L.. 1992. Colony state and regulation of pollen foraging in the honey bee, Apis mellifera. L. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. In press.Google Scholar
Filmer, R.S. 1932. Brood area and colony size as factors in the activity of pollination units. J. econ. Ent. 25: 336–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Free, J.B. 1967. Factors determining the collection of pollen by honeybee foragers. Anim. Behav. 15: 134–144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Free, J.B. 1987. Pheromones of Social Bees. Chapman and Hall, London, England. pp. 29–68.Google Scholar
Hellmich, R.L. II, and Rothenbuhler, W.C.. 1986. Relationship between different amounts of brood and collection and use of pollen by the honey bee (Apis mellifera). Apidologie 17(1): 13–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaycox, E.R. 1970 a. Honey bee queen pheromones and worker foraging behavior. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 63(1): 222–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaycox, E.R. 1970 b. Honey bee foraging behavior: Responses to queens, larvae, and extracts of larvae. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 63(6): 1689–1694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaminski, L.-A., Slessor, K.N., Winston, M.L., Hay, N.W., and Borden, J.H.. 1990. Honey bee response to queen mandibular pheromone in laboratory bioassays. J. Chem. Ecol. 16: 841–850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moeller, F.E. 1972. Honey bee collection of corn pollen reduced by feeding pollen in the hive. Am. Bee J. 112: 210–212.Google Scholar
Naumann, K., Winston, M.L., Slessor, K.N., Prestwich, G.D., and Webster, F.X.. 1991. Production and transmission of honey bee queen (Apis mellifera L.) mandibular gland pheromone. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 29: 321–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pain, J., and Roger, B.. 1978. Rhythme circadien des acides céto-9 décène öique, phéromone de la reine, et hydroxy-10 décène-2 öique des ouvrières d'abeilles A. mellifica ligustica S. Apidologie 9: 263–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ribbands, C.R. 1953. The Behaviour and Social Life of Honey Bees. Bee Research Association, London. Ch. 30. [Repr. 1964, New York, Dover.]Google Scholar
Rinderer, T.E. 1981. Volatiles from empty comb increase hoarding by the honey bee. J. Apic. Res. 24: 161–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rinderer, T.E., and Baxter, J.R.. 1978. Effect of empty comb on hoarding behavior and honey production of the honey bee. J. econ. Ent. 71: 757–759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS Institute Inc. 1985. SAS® User's Guide: Statistics, Version 5 Edition. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC. 956 pp.Google Scholar
Seeley, T.D. 1979. Queen substance dispersal by messenger workers in honeybee colonies. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 5: 391–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seeley, T.D., and Fell, R.D.. 1981. Queen substance production in honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies preparing to swarm (Hymenoptera: Apidae). J. Kansas ent. Soc. 54: 192–196.Google Scholar
Slessor, K.N., Kaminski, L.-A., King, G.G.S., Borden, J.H., and Winston, M.L.. 1988. The semiochemical basis of the retinue response to queen honey bees. Nature 332: 354–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slessor, K.N., Kaminski, L.-A., King, G.G.S., and Winston, M.L.. 1990. Semiochemicals of the honey bee queen mandibular glands. J. Chem. Ecol. 16: 851–860.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Todd, F.E., and Reed, C.B.. 1970. Brood measurement as a valid index to the value of honey bees as pollinators. J. econ. Ent. 63(1): 148–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winston, M.L. 1987. The Biology of the Honey Bee. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. pp. 136–147.Google Scholar
Winston, M.L., Higo, H.A., Colley, S.C., Pankiw, T., and Slessor, K.N.. 1991. The role of queen mandibular pheromone and colony congestion in honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) reproductive swarming. J. Insect Behav. 4(5): 649–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winston, M.L., Higo, H.A., and Slessor, K.N.. 1990. Effect of various dosages of queen mandibular gland pheromone on the inhibition of queen rearing in the honey bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 83(2): 234–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winston, M.L., Slessor, K.N., Willis, L.G., Naumann, K., Higo, H.A., Wyborn, M.H., and Kaminski, L.A.. 1989. The influence of queen mandibular pheromones on worker attraction to swarm clusters and inhibition of queen rearing in the honey bee (Apis mellifera L.). Insectes Sociaux 36(1): 15–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar