Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:15:53.043Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

EFFECT OF ADDITIONAL COMPONENTS ON A SEX ATTRACTANT FOR THE OAK LEAF SHREDDER, CROESIA SEMIPURPURANA (LEPIDOPTERA: TORTRICIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

G. G. Grant
Affiliation:
Forest Pest Management Institute, Canadian Forestry Service, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario P6A 5M7
D. Frech
Affiliation:
Forest Pest Management Institute, Canadian Forestry Service, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario P6A 5M7
L. MacDonald
Affiliation:
Forest Pest Management Institute, Canadian Forestry Service, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario P6A 5M7
B. Doyle
Affiliation:
Forest Pest Management Institute, Canadian Forestry Service, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario P6A 5M7

Extract

The oak leaf shredder, Croesia semipurpurana (Kearfott), has been a particularly persistent pest of red oak, Quercus rubra, in southern Ontario for several years. It is capable of completely defoliating mature trees leading either to increased susceptibility to disease or mortality. In 1980 about 800 ha in southern Ontario required spraying with Orthenem insecticide (Howse and McDowall 1980). The development of a sex pheromone lure for the oak leaf shredder would be valuable for survey purposes, post-insecticidal spray analysis of adult survival in treated plots, and for potential direct control by means of the disruption technique. Recently mixtures of (E)-11-tetradecenal (E11-14:AL) and Z11-14:AL in the ratios of 80:20 to 90:lO were found to be attractive to male moths (Weatherston et al. 1978). A local outbreak of oak leaf shredder in Sault Ste. Marie afforded an opportunity to determine the insect's response to modifications of the aldehyde blend in order to improve the efficiency of pheromone trapping of this species.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ando, T., Kuroko, H., Nakagaki, S., Saito, O., Oku, T., and Takahashi, N.. 1978. Two-component sex attractant for male moths of the subfamily Tortricinae (Lepidoptera). Agric. biol. Chem. 42: 10811083.Google Scholar
Cardé, R. T., Cardé, A. M., Hill, A. S., and Roelofs, W. L.. 1977. Sex pheromone specificity as a reproductive isolating mechanism among the sibling species Archips argyrospilus and A. mortuanus and other sympatric tortricine moths (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). J. chem. Ecol. 3: 7184.Google Scholar
Hill, A., Cardé, R., Comeau, A., Bode, W., and Roelofs, W.. 1974. Sex pheromones of the tufted apple bud moth (Playnota ideausalis). Environ. Ent. 3: 249252.Google Scholar
Howse, G. M. and McDowall, L. L.. 1980. Forest insect and disease conditions in Ontario, spring 1980. Survey Bulletin, Great Lakes Forest Research Centre. 10 pp.Google Scholar
Roelofs, W. L. and Comeau, A.. 1971. Sex pheromone perception: synergists and inhibitors for the red-banded leaf roller attractant. J. Insect Physiol. 17: 435448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roelofs, W. L., Cardé, R. T., and Tette, J. P.. 1973. Oriental fruit moth attractant synergists. Environ. Ent. 2: 252452.Google Scholar
Voerman, S. 1979. Synthesis, purification and field screening of potential insect sex pheromones. pp. 353363in Ritter, F. J. (Ed.), Chemical Ecology: Odour Communication in Animals. Elsevier North-Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Weatherston, J., Grant, G. G., MacDonald, L. M., Frech, D., Werner, R. A., Leznoff, C. C., and Fyles, T. M.. 1978. Attraction of various tortricine moths to blends containing cis-11-tetradecenal. J. chem. Ecol. 4: 543549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar