Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T03:49:44.063Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dry bolls and their association with Anthonomus grandis grandis Boheman (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) survival through cotton fallow periods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 August 2021

Willian S. do Vale Open the ORCID record for Willian S. do Vale [Opens in a new window] ,
Maria A. Castellani Open the ORCID record for Maria A. Castellani [Opens in a new window] ,
Victor R. de Novais ,
Welliny S.R. Dias ,
Ana Carolina S. Lima ,
Edenilson B. Ribeiro ,
Adriana D. Cardoso  and
Carlos A. Domingues da Silva
Willian S. do Vale*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Fitotecnia e Zootecnia, Universidade Estadual do Sudoeste da Bahia, Bahia, Vitória da Conquista, 45.083-300, Brazil
Maria A. Castellani
Affiliation:
Departamento de Fitotecnia e Zootecnia, Universidade Estadual do Sudoeste da Bahia, Bahia, Vitória da Conquista, 45.083-300, Brazil
Victor R. de Novais
Affiliation:
Departamento de Fitotecnia e Zootecnia, Universidade Estadual do Sudoeste da Bahia, Bahia, Vitória da Conquista, 45.083-300, Brazil
Welliny S.R. Dias
Affiliation:
Departamento de Fitotecnia e Zootecnia, Universidade Estadual do Sudoeste da Bahia, Bahia, Vitória da Conquista, 45.083-300, Brazil
Ana Carolina S. Lima
Affiliation:
Departamento de Fitotecnia e Zootecnia, Universidade Estadual do Sudoeste da Bahia, Bahia, Vitória da Conquista, 45.083-300, Brazil
Edenilson B. Ribeiro
Affiliation:
Departamento de Fitotecnia e Zootecnia, Universidade Estadual do Sudoeste da Bahia, Bahia, Vitória da Conquista, 45.083-300, Brazil
Adriana D. Cardoso
Affiliation:
Departamento de Fitotecnia e Zootecnia, Universidade Estadual do Sudoeste da Bahia, Bahia, Vitória da Conquista, 45.083-300, Brazil
Carlos A. Domingues da Silva
Affiliation:
Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária, Paraíba, Campina Grande, 58.428-095, Brazil
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The boll weevil, Anthonomus grandis grandis Boheman (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), can remain inside dry and deformed reproductive structures of cotton, Gossypium hirsutum Linnaeus (Malvaceae), known as dry bolls, during the cotton fallow to infest the next cotton crop. In this study, the influence of cotton cultivars and sowing densities on the formation of dry bolls was evaluated. In addition, dry bolls were dissected and internal structures that were related to boll weevil development were estimated. Finally, the presence and survival of boll weevils inside dry bolls were evaluated. The results indicate that the number of dry bolls, empty pupal cells, and emergence holes was influenced by cultivar and not by sowing density. Almost one-quarter (22.53%) of adult boll weevils examined was found alive inside the dry bolls after 10 weeks, which is slightly longer than the duration of cotton fallow in Brazil’s main cotton-producing regions. Therefore, remaining inside the dry bolls is an important survival strategy for boll weevils during the cotton fallow period, and cotton cultivars with a greater propensity for the formation of dry bolls might favour survival of the pest during this period.

Type
Research Paper
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 153 , Issue 6 , December 2021 , pp. 714 - 725
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Entomological Society of Canada

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Subject editor: Christopher Cutler

References

Agência de Defesa Agropecuária da Bahia. 2018. Portaria No 253 de 25 de setembro de 2018. Secretaria da Agricultura, Pecuária, Irrigação, Pesca e Aquicultura – SEAGRI, Governo do Estado da Bahia, Salvador, Brazil. Available from http://www.adab.ba.gov.br/modules/conteudo/conteudo.php?conteudo=16 [accessed 10 July 2019].Google Scholar
Azambuja, R. and Degrande, P.E. 2014. Trinta anos do bicudo-do-algodoeiro no Brasil. Arquivos do Instituto Biológico, 81: 377–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., and Walker, S. 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67: 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bednarz, C.W., Nichols, R.L., and Brown, S.M. 2006. Plant density modifications of cotton within-boll yield components. Crop Science, 46. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2005.12.0493.Google Scholar
Bednarz, C.W., Shurley, W.D., Anthony, W.S., and Nichols, R.L. 2005. Yield, quality, and profitability of cotton produced at varying plant densities. Agronomy Journal, 97: 235–240.Google Scholar
Bélot, J.L., Barros, E.M., and Miranda, J.E. 2016. Riscos e oportunidades: o bicudo-do-algodoeiro. In Desafios do Cerrado: como sustentar a expansão da produção com produtividade e competitividade. Edited by AMPA, APROSOJA-MT, and Embrapa. Associação Mato-grossense dos Produtores de Algodão, Cuiabá, Brazil. Pp. 77–118.Google Scholar
Borin, A.L.D.C., Ferreira, G.B., and Carvalho, M.C.S. 2014. Adubação do algodoeiro no ambiente de cerrado. Embrapa Algodão, Campina Grande, Brazil.Google Scholar
Cardoso, U.P., Castellani, M.A., Forti, L.C., Menezes, A.O.J., Moreira, A., Colmenarez, Y.C., et al. 2009. Índice de infestação e fatores de mortalidade do bicudo-do-algodoeiro (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) no semi-árido do sudoeste da Bahia, Brasil. Entomotropica, 24: 111–122.Google Scholar
Crawley, M.J. 2012. The R book. John Wiley & Sons, West Sussex, United Kingdom.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuadrado, G.A. and Garralla, S.S. 2000. Plantas alimenticias alternativas del picudo del algodonero (Anthonomus grandis Boh.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) en la provincia de Formosa, Argentina. Análisis palinológico del tracto digestivo. Anais da Sociedade Entomológica do Brasil, 29: 245–255.10.1590/S0301-80592000000200006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Oliveira, R.S., Oliveira-Neto, O.B., Moura, H.F.N., de Macedo, L.L.P., Arraes, F.B.M., Lucena, W.A., et al. 2016. Transgenic cotton plants expressing Cry1Ia12 toxin confer resistance to fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda) and cotton boll weevil (Anthonomus grandis). Frontiers in Plant Science, 7: 165. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrari, S., Furlani Junior, E., Ferrari, J.V., and Alberton, J.V. 2012. Plantas de cobertura e adubação nitrogenada na cultura do algodoeiro. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Agrárias, 7: 226–232. https://doi.org/10.5039/agraria.v7i2a1290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fillman, D.A. and Sterling, W.L. 1983. Killing power of the red imported fire ant [Hym.: Formicidae]: a key predator of the boll weevil [Col.: Curculionidae]. Entomophaga, 28: 339–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02372186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, J.L. and Ray, L.L. 1977. Response of two cotton genotypes to five equidistant spacing patterns. Agronomy Journal, 69: 733–738. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1977.00021962006900050001x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabriel, D. 2002. Avaliação de malváceas cultivadas como hospedeiras alternativas para a reprodução do bicudo do algodoeiro Anthonomus grandis Boh. 1843, no laboratório. Arquivos do Instituto Biológico, 69: 69–76.Google Scholar
Greenberg, S.M., Showler, A.T., Sappington, T.W., and Bradford, J.M. 2004. Effects of burial and soil condition on postharvest mortality of boll weevils (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in fallen cotton fruit. Journal of Economic Entomology, 97: 409–413. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/97.2.409.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guerra, A.A., Garcia, R.F., Bodegas V., P.R., and De Coss F., M.E. 1984. The quiescent physiological status of boll weevils (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) during the noncotton season in the tropical zone of Soconusco in Chiapas, Mexico. Journal of Economic Entomology, 77: 595–598. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/77.3.595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Instituto de Defesa Agropecuária de Mato Grosso. 2016. Portaria No 001 de 3 de maio de 2016. Governo do Estado de Mato Grosso Secretaria de Estado de Gestão - Imprensa Oficial, Cuiabá, Brazil. Available from http://www.indea.mt.gov.br/documents/363967/8546763/IN+Sedec+Indea+0012016/38000563-6146-520b-07d2-3fa4623f6df7 [accessed 26 November 2019].Google Scholar
Instituto Nacional de Meteorologia. 2015. Dados Históricos Anuais. Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento, Brasília, Brazil. Available from https://portal.inmet.gov.br/dadoshistoricos [accessed 20 December 2020].Google Scholar
Jost, P.H. and Cothren, J.T. 2000. Growth and yield comparisons of cotton planted in conventional and ultra-narrow row spacings. Crop Science, 40: 430–435. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2000.402430x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, E.L. and Meier, P. 1958. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 53: 457–481. https://doi.org/10.2307/2281868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khan, N., Han, Y., Xing, F., Feng, L., Wang, Z., Wang, G., et al. 2020. Plant density influences reproductive growth, lint yield and boll spatial distribution of cotton. Agronomy, 10: 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10010014.Google Scholar
Khan, N., Hassan, G., Marwat, K., Batool, S., Makhdoom, K., Khan, I., et al. 2009. Genetic variability and heritability in upland cotton. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 41: 1695–1705.Google Scholar
Lenth, R.V. 2016. Least-squares means: the R Package lsmeans. Journal of Statistical Software, 69: 1–33. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v069.i01.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macêdo, J.A. 2014. Fontes alternativas de alimento e sobrevivência do bicudo (Anthonomus grandis Boheman, 1843 (Coleoptera, Curculionidae) em carimã na entressafra. M.S. thesis. Universidade Estadual do Sudoeste da Bahia, Vitória da Conquista, Universidade Estadual do Sudoeste da Bahia., Vitória da Conquista, Brazil.Google Scholar
Macêdo, J.A.D., Castellani, M.A., Santos, F.A.R., Oliveira, P.P., and Maluf, R.P. 2015. Fontes alternativas de pólen utilizadas pelo bicudo-do-algodoeiro em duas regiões produtoras de algodão na Bahia. Revista Caatinga, 28: 255–262. https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-21252015v28n329rc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mailhot, D.J., Marois, J.J., and Wright, D.L. 2007. Influence of flower thrips on fusarium hardlock severity. Plant Disease, 91: 1423–1429. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-91-11-1423.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miranda, J.E. and Rodrigues, S.M.M. 2015. História do bicudo no Brasil. In O bicudo-do-algodoeiro (Anthonomus grandis Boh., 1843) nos cerrados brasileiros: biologia e medidas de controle. Edited by Bélot, J.L.. Instituto Mato-grossense do Algodão, Cuiabá, Brazil. Pp. 11–45.Google Scholar
Osekre, E.A., Wright, D.L., Marois, J.J., and Funderburk, J. 2009. Flower-inhabiting Frankliniella thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae), pesticides, and Fusarium hardlock in cotton. Journal of Economic Entomology, 102: 887–896. https://doi.org/10.1603/029.102.0305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pimenta, M., Mata, R.A., Venzon, M., Cunha, D.N.C., Fontes, E.M.G., Pires, C.S.S., and Sujii, E.R. 2016. Survival and preference of cotton boll weevil adults for alternative food sources. Brazilian Journal of Biology, 76: 387–395. https://doi.org/10.1590/1519-6984.16214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pires, C.S.S., Pimenta, M., da Mata, R.A., Souza, L.M., Paula, D.P., Sujii, E.R., and Fontes, E.M.G. 2017. Survival pattern of the boll weevil during cotton fallow in Midwestern Brazil. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 52: 149–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Praça, L.B. 2007. Anthonomus grandis Boheman, 1843 (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia, Brasília, Brazil.Google Scholar
R Core Team. 2018. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing Vienna, Austria. Available from https://www.R-project.org.Google Scholar
Ramalho, F. de S. and Silva, J.R.B. 1993. Período de emergência e mortalidade natural do bicudo-do-algodoeiro. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 28: 1221–1231.Google Scholar
Ribeiro, E.B. 2015. Sobrevivência de bicudos em carimãs de diferentes cultivares e métodos de destruição de restos de cultura do algodão. M.S. thesis, Universidade Estadual do Sudoeste da Bahia, Vitória da Conquista, Universidade Estadual do Sudoeste da Bahia, Vitória da Conquista, Brazil.Google Scholar
Ribeiro, E.B., Castellani, M.A., da Silva, C.A.D., Melo, T.L., Silva, G. dos S., do Vale, W.S., and Santos, A.S. 2015. Métodos de destruição de restos de cultura do algodoeiro e sobrevivência do bicudo. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 50: 993–998. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2015001100001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ribeiro, E.B., da Silva, C.A.D., de Novais, V.R., do Vale, W.S., Silva, G. dos S., Melo, T.L., et al. 2020. Formação de carimãs e sobrevivência do bicudo do algodoeiro em cultivares de algodão. Scientia Plena, 16. https://doi.org/10.14808/sci.plena.2020.020202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ribeiro, P. de A., Sujii, E.R., Diniz, I.R., de Medeiros, M.A., Salgado-Labouriau, M.L., Branco, M.C., et al. 2010. Alternative food sources and overwintering feeding behavior of the boll weevil, Anthonomus grandis Boheman (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) under the tropical conditions of central Brazil. Neotropical Entomology, 39: 28–34. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-566X2010000100005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos, W.J. 2015a. Medidas estratégicas de controle do bicudo-do-algodoeiro (Anthonomus grandis Boh., 1843). In O bicudo-do-algodoeiro (Anthonomus grandis Boh., 1843) nos cerrados brasileiros: biologia e medidas de controle. Edited by Bélot, J.L.. Instituto Mato-grossense do Algodão, Cuiabá, Brazil. Pp. 79–94.Google Scholar
Santos, W.J. 2015b. Manejo das pragas do algodão, com destaque para o cerrado brasileiro. In Algodão no cerrado do Brasil. Third edition. Edited by Freire, E.C.. Associação Brasileira dos Produtores de Algodão, Brasília, Brazil. Pp. 267–364.Google Scholar
Showler, A.T. 2006. Short-range dispersal and overwintering habitats of boll weevils (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) during and after harvest in the subtropics. Journal of Economic Entomology, 99: 1152–1160. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/99.4.1152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Showler, A.T. 2007. Subtropical boll weevil ecology. American Entomologist, 5: 240–249. https://doi.org/10.1093/ae/53.4.240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Showler, A.T. and Abrigo, V. 2007. Common subtropical and tropical nonpollen food sources of the boll weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Environmental Entomology, 36: 99–104. https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/36.1.99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Showler, A.T. and Scott, A.W. 2004. Effects of insecticide residues on adult boll weevils and immatures developing inside fallen cotton fruit. Subtropical Plant Science, 56: 33–38.Google Scholar
Siebert, J.D., Stewart, A.M., and Leonard, B.R. 2006. Comparative growth and yield of cotton planted at various densities and configurations. Agronomy Journal, 98: 562–568. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2005.0181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Srivastava, P., Mailhot, D.J., Leite, B., Marois, J.J., Wright, D.L., and Nichols, R.L. 2010. Fusarium verticillioides (Saccardo) Nirenberg associated with hardlock of cotton. Current Microbiology, 61: 79–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-009-9578-5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sturm, M.M. and Sterling, W.L. 1990. Geographical patterns of boll weevil mortality: observations and hypothesis. Environmental Entomology, 19: 59–65. https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/19.1.59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Summy, K.R., Cate, J.R., and Bar, D. 1993. Overwinter survival of boll weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in southern Texas: entrapment in desiccated bolls. Journal of Economic Entomology, 86: 421–426. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/86.2.421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Superintendência de Estudos Econômicos e Sociais da Bahia. 1999. Balanço hídrico do Estado da Bahia, Notas de estudo de Engenharia Agronômica. Salvador, Brazil. Série Estudos e Pesquisas, 45.Google Scholar
Texas Department of Agriculture. 2019. Cotton pest control: regulatory programs – cotton stalk destruction. Chapter 20. Texas Department of Agriculture, Government of Texas, Austin, Texas, United States of America. Available from https://www.texasagriculture.gov/RegulatoryPrograms/CottonStalkDestruction.aspx.Google Scholar
Therneau, T.M. 2015. A package for survival analysis in R. R package version 2.38. Available from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=survival.Google Scholar
Torres, J.B., Vivian, L.M., Bastos, C.S., and Barros, E.M. 2015. Controle cultural como método de convivência com as pragas do algodoeiro. In Algodão no cerrado do Brasil. Third edition. Edited by Freire, E.C.. Associação Brasileira dos Produtores de Algodão, Brasília, Brazil. Pp. 114–139.Google Scholar
Vieira, E.I., Nascimento, E.J., and Paz, J.G. 1998. Levantamento ultra detalhado de solos do Campus da UESB em Vitória da Conquista. Departamento de Engenharia Agrícola e Solos, Vitória da Conquista, Brazil.Google Scholar