Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T03:24:11.682Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

DIVERSIFICATION AND SECONDARY INTERGRADATION OF TWO CHRYSOPA CARNEA STRAINS (NEUROPTERA: CHRYSOPIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Catherine A. Tauber  and
Maurice J. Tauber
Catherine A. Tauber
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York
Maurice J. Tauber
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Analysis of larval and adult characters, as well as biological data from various geographic populations, indicates that Chrysopa mohave Banks and Chrysopa carnea Stephens represent two strains of a single species and C. mohave is therefore designated a new synonym of C. carnea. The carnea strain occurs allopatrically throughout eastern and midwestern North America and the mohave strain is probably indigenous to California.

The pattern of variation found in larvae and adults from different populations suggests that the carnea strain was secondarily introduced into California where it interbred with the mohave strain. This hybridization resulted in genetically varied populations with predominantly carnea characteristics in California’s Central Valley. Populations of the mohave strain occur in the California foothill and coastal areas because adults of the mohave strain, unlike the carnea strain, can aestivate during the hot, dry summers when food is sparse. Summer irrigation increases the abundance of larval and adult food which the non-aestivating carnea strain needs. It appears that the native mohave strain will compete successfully only in those areas of California which are unmodified by agricultural practices.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 105 , Issue 9 , September 1973 , pp. 1153 - 1167
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, P. A. 1963. Taxonomy of Hawaiian Chrysopa (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Proc. Hawaiian ent. Soc. 18: 221–223.Google Scholar
Banks, N. 1938. New Chrysopidae and species new to the United States. Can. Ent. 70: 118–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bram, R. A. and Bickley, W. E.. 1963. The green lacewings of the genus Chrysopa in Maryland (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Univ. Maryland agric. Exp. Stn Bull. A-124. 18 pp.Google Scholar
Hagen, K. S. 1950. Fecundity of Chrysopa californica as affected by synthetic foods. J. econ. Ent. 43: 101–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagen, K. S. 1962. Biology and ecology of predaceous Coccinellidae. A. Rev. Ent. 7: 289–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagen, K. S., Tassan, R. L., and Sawall, E. F. Jr., 1970. Some ecophysiological relationships between certain Chrysopa, honeydews and yeasts. Boll. Lab. Ent. agr. Filippo Silvestri Port. 28: 113–134.Google Scholar
Killington, F. J. 1937. A monograph of the British neuroptera, Vol. II. Ray Soc., London. 306 pp.Google Scholar
Mayr, E. 1969. Principles of systematic zoology. McGraw-Hill, New York. 428 pp.Google Scholar
Neumark, S. 1952. Chrysopa carnea Stephens and its enemies in Israel. For. Res. Stn Ilanoth 1: 1–125.Google Scholar
Peterson, A. 1959. Larvae of insects, I. Edwards, Ann Arbor, Mich.315 pp.Google Scholar
Sheldon, J. K. and MacLeod, E. G.. 1971. Studies on the biology of the Chrysopidae. II. The feeding behavior of the adult of Chrysopa carnea (Neuroptera). Psyche, Camb. 78: 107–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, R. C. 1922. The biology of the Chrysopidae. Cornell agric. Exp. Stn Mem. 58. pp. 1287–1372.Google Scholar
Sundby, R. A. 1967. Influence of food on the fecundity of Chrysopa carnea Stephens (Neuroptera, Chrysopidae). Entomophaga 12: 475–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tauber, C. A. 1969. Taxonomy and biology of the lacewing genus Meleoma (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Univ. Calif. Pubs Ent. 58. 94 pp.Google Scholar
Tauber, M. J. and Tauber, C. A.. 1971. An autosomal recessive mutant in a neuropteran (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Can. Ent. 103: 906–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tauber, M. J. and Tauber, C. A.. 1973 a. Nutritional and photoperiodic control of the seasonal reproductive cycle in Chrysopa mohave (Neuroptera). J. Insect Physiol. 19: 729–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tauber, M. J. and Tauber, C. A.. 1973 b. Seasonal regulation of dormancy in Chrysopa carnea (Neuroptera). J. Insect Physiol. 19: 1455–1463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tauber, M. J. and Tauber, C. A.. 1973 c. Quantitative response to daylength during diapause in insects. Nature, Lond. 244: 296–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tauber, M. J., Tauber, C. A., and Denys, C. J.. 1970. Adult diapause in Chrysopa carnea: photoperiodic control of duration and colour. J. Insect Physiol. 16: 949–955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tjeder, B. 1966. Neuroptera-Planipennia. The lacewings of South Africa. 5. Chrysopidae. South African Animal Life 12: 228–534.Google Scholar
Withycombe, C. L. 1922. Notes on the biology of some British Neuroptera (Planipennia). Trans. ent. Soc. Lond. 3, 4: 501–594.Google Scholar
Zeleny, J. 1965. Lace-wings (Neuroptera) in cultural steppe and the population dynamics in the species Chrysopa carnea Steph. and Chrysopa phyllochroma Wesm. Acta ent. bohemoslov 62: 177–194.Google Scholar