Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:57:51.941Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

DIFFERENCE IN THE TRANSMISSION OF PVY° TO POTATO AND TOBACCO BY THE POTATO APHID, MACROSIPHUM EUPHORBIAE (THOMAS): EFFECTS OF PROBING DURATION AND FREQUENCY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Gilles Boiteau
Affiliation:
Agriculture Canada Research Station, PO Box 20280, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada E3B 4Z7
R.P. Singh
Affiliation:
Agriculture Canada Research Station, PO Box 20280, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada E3B 4Z7

Abstract

The probing behavior of the potato aphid, Macrosiphum euphorbiae (Thomas), is significantly different on potato than on tobacco plants. The higher frequency of short-duration probes, ideal for the transmission of nonpersistent viruses, is the apparent cause for the higher rate of potato virus Y° (PVY°) transmission on tobacco than on potato. However, experimental augmentation of short inoculation probes by M. euphorbiae on potato and tobacco failed to increase PVY° transmission on either. These results demonstrate the absence of a causal relationship between variations in probing behavior of M. euphorbiae and variations in the transmissibility of PVY° by this vector on tobacco and potato.

Résumé

Le comportement de piqûre du puceron de la pomme de terre, Macrosiphum euphorbiae (Thomas), est significativement différent sur plants de pomme de terre et de tabac. Les piqûres de courte durée, idéale pour la transmission des virus non persistants, sont plus fréquentes sur les tabac que sur la pomme de terre. Ces piqûres constituent la cause apparente des taux plus élevés de transmission du virus de la pomme de terre Y° (PVY°) sur tabac que sur pomme de terre. Cependant, l’augmentation expérimentale des piqûres de transmission par M. euphorbiae sur pomme de terre et sur tabac n’a pas réussi à changer le taux de transmission sur une espèce ou l’autre de plantes. Ces résultats demontrent l’absence d’une relation causale entre les variations dans le comportement de piqûre de M. euphorbiae et les variations dans la transmissibilité du PVY° par ce vecteur sur tabac ou pomme de terre.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beirne, B.P. 1972. Pest insects of annual crop plants in Canada: IV. Hemiptera–Homoptera, V. Orthoptera, VI. Other groups. Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 85. 73 pp.Google Scholar
Blackman, R.L., and Eastop, V.F.. 1984. Aphids on the World's Crops: An Identification and Information Guide. John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY. 466 pp.Google Scholar
Bradley, R.H.E. 1953. Infectivity of aphids after several hours on tobacco infected with potato virus Y. Nature 171: 755756.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bradley, R.H.E. 1954. Studies of the mechanism of transmission of potato virus Y by the green peach aphid, Myzus persicae (Sulzer) (Homoptera: Aphididae). Can. J. Zool. 32: 6473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, R.H.E., and Rideout, D.W.. 1953. Comparative transmission of potato virus Y by four aphid species that infest potato. Can. J. Zool. 31: 333341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Day, M.F., and Irzykiewiz, H.. 1954. On the mechanism of transmission of nonpersistent phytopathogenic viruses by aphids. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 7: 251273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibson, R.W., Price, A.D., Pickett, J.A., Smith, M.C., and Sawicki, R.M.. 1982. The effects of the repellents dodecanoic acid and polygodial on the acquisition of non-, semi- and persistent plant viruses by the aphid Myzus persicae. Ann. appl. Biol. 100: 5559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, K.F. 1977. An ingestion–egestion hypothesis of noncirculative virus transmission. pp. 165–220 in Harris, K.F., and Maramorosch, K. (Eds.), Aphids as Virus Vectors. Academic Press, New York, NY. 559 pp.Google Scholar
Harrison, B.D., and Murant, A.F.. 1984. Involvement of virus-coded proteins in transmission of plant viruses by vectors. pp. 1–36 in Mayo, M.A., and Harrap, K.A. (Eds.), Vectors in Virus Biology. Academic Press, New York, NY. 190 pp.Google Scholar
Irwin, M.E., and Ruesink, W.G.. 1986. Vector intensity: A product of propensity and activity. pp. 13–34 in McLean, G.D, Garrett, R.G., and Ruesink, W.G. (Eds.), Plant Virus Epidemics, Monitoring Modelling and Predicting Outbreaks. Academic Press, New York, NY. 550 pp.Google Scholar
Kennedy, G.G. 1976. Host plant resistance and the spread of plant viruses. Environ. Ent. 5: 827832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, J.S. 1960. The behavioral fitness of aphids as field vectors of viruses. pp. 165–168 in Report 7th Commonwealth Entomological Conference. Commonwealth Institute of Entomology, London. 399 pp.Google Scholar
Lapointe, S.L., Tingey, W.M., and Zitter, T.A.. 1987. Potato virus Y transmission reduced in an aphid-resistant potato species. Phytopathology 77: 819822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proeseler, G., and Weidling, W.. 1975. The retention period of strains of potato virus Y in several aphid species and the effect of temperature. Arch. Pflanzenschultz 11: 335345. [In German.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raccah, B. 1986. Nonpersistent viruses: Epidemiology and control. Adv. Virus Res. 31: 387429.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roitberg, B.B., Myers, J.H., and Frazer, B.D.. 1979. The influence of predators on the movement of apterous pea aphids between plants. J. anim. Ecol. 48: 111122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, R.P., and Boiteau, G.. 1984. Necrotic lesion host for potato virus Y useful in epidemiological studies. Plant Disease 68: 779781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, R.P., and Boiteau, G.. 1986. Reevaluation of the potato aphid, Macrosiphum euphorbiae (Thomas), as vector of potato virus Y. Am. Potato J. 63: 335340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, R.P., and Santos-Rojas, J.. 1983. Detection of potato virus Y in primarily infected mature plants by ELISA, indicator host, and virus indexing. Can. Plant Dis. Surv. 63: 3944.Google Scholar
Sylvester, E.S. 1949. Beet-mosaic virus – green peach aphid relationships. Phytopathology 39: 417424.Google Scholar