Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:40:24.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

DIEL PERIODICITY OF MALE SEX PHEROMONE RESPONSE AND FEMALE ATTRACTIVENESS IN THE GYPSY MOTH (LEPIDOPTERA: LYMANTRIIDAE)1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

R. T. Cardé ,
C. C. Doane  and
W. L. Roelofs
R. T. Cardé
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, New York State Agricultural Experiment Station, Geneva
C. C. Doane
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station, New Haven
W. L. Roelofs
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, New York State Agricultural Experiment Station, Geneva
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In field studies gypsy moth males were attracted to synthetic cis-7,8-epoxy-2-methyloctadecane (disparlure), the female sex pheromone, and virgin females from 0900 to 2000 (Eastern Standard Time). The greatest numbers of males were lured to the synthetic attractant or the calling female from 1100 to 1500. These periods of male response are longer than reported in previous (1896 and 1932) New England investigations and suggest the possible recent evolution of a new diel rhythm of male sex pheromone response.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 106 , Issue 5 , May 1974 , pp. 479 - 484
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ambros, W. 1938. Einige spezielle Beobachtungen und Untersuchungen während der Nonnenkontrolle in Jahre 1937. Z. ges. Fortwesen 64: 49–60.Google Scholar
Ambros, W. 1940. Einige Beobachtungen und Untersuchungen an der Nonne im Jahre 1938. Z. ges. Fortwesen 66: 131–147; 166–169.Google Scholar
Bierl, B.A., Beroza, M., and Collier, C. W.. 1970. Potent sex attractant of the gypsy moth, Porthetria dispar (L.): Its isolation, identification and synthesis. Science 170: 87–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardé, R. T. 1971 (unpub.). Aspects of reproductive isolation in the Holomelina au antiaca complex (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae). Ph.D. Thesis, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Cardé, R. T. and Roelofs, W. L.. 1973. Temperature modification of male sex pheromone response and factors affecting female calling in Holomelina immaculata (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae). Can. Ent. 105: 1505–1512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, C. W. and Potts, S. F.. 1932. Attractants for the flying gipsy moths as an aid in locating new infestations. U.S. Dep. Agric. Tech. Bull. 336. 43 pp.Google Scholar
Comeau, A. 1971 (unpub.). Physiology of sex pheromone attraction in Tortricidae and other Lepidoptera (Herterocera). Ph.D. Thesis, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Forbush, E. H. and Fernald, C. H.. 1896. The gypsy moth. Wright and Potter Printing Co., Boston. 495 pp.Google Scholar
Görnitz, K. 1949. Anlockversuche mit dem weiblichen Sexualduftstoff des Schwammspinners (Lymantria dispar) und der Nonne (Lymantria monacha). Anz. Schädlingsk. 22: 145–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacentkovský, D. 1932. Nový způsob kontroly mnišky. Les. Pr. 11: 149–152.Google Scholar
Jacentkovský, D. 1934. Výskyt bekyně vekohlavé (Liparis dispar L.) v polesi Rafajna (Podk. Rus.). Les. Pr. 13: 27–36.Google Scholar
Jacobson, M. 1965. Insect sex attractants. Interscience (Wiley), New York. 154 pp.Google Scholar
Jacobson, M. 1972. Insect sex pheromones. Academic Press, New York. 382 pp.Google Scholar
Leonard, D. E. 1970. Intrinsic factors causing qualitative changes in populations of Porthetria dispar (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae). Can. Ent. 102: 239–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayr, E. 1963. Animal species and evolution. Belknap Press, Cambridge. 797 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nolte, H. W. 1940. Neue Erfahrungen zur Dykschen Nonnenanlockmethode. Z. ges. Forstwesen 66: 197–206; 252–267.Google Scholar
Prüffer, J. 1923 (1924). Observations et expériences due les phéromènes de la vie sexuelle de Lymantria dispar L. Bull. int. Acad. pol. Sci. Lett. (B) 1: 1–9.Google Scholar
Richerson, J. V. and Cameron, E. A.. 1974. Differences in pheromone release and sexual behavior between laboratory reared and wild gypsy moth adults. Envir. Ent. (in press).Google Scholar
Sanders, C. J. and Lucuik, G. S.. 1972. Factors affecting calling by female eastern spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Can. Ent. 104: 1751–1762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, D., Lange, R., Schwarz, F., Beroza, M., and Bierl, B. A.. 1974. Attraction of male gypsy and nun moths to disparlure and some of its chemical analogues. Oecologia 14: 19–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schönherr, J. 1972. Die Wirkung von Disparlure auf die Nonne, Lymantria monacha L. Z. angew ent. 71: 260–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sower, L. L., Shorey, H. H., and Gaston, L. K.. 1971. Sex pheromones of noctuid moths. XXV. Effects of temperature and photoperiod on circadian rhythms of sex pheromone release by females of Trichoplusia ni. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 64: 488–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar