Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T19:15:58.866Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Developing and integrating tactics to slow ash (Oleaceae) mortality caused by emerald ash borer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2015

Deborah G. McCullough ,
Rodrigo J. Mercader  and
Nathan W. Siegert
Deborah G. McCullough*
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology and Department of Forestry, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, United States of America
Rodrigo J. Mercader
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Washburn University, Topeka, Kansas 66621, United States of America
Nathan W. Siegert
Affiliation:
State and Private Forestry, US Forest Service, Northeastern Area, Durham, New Hampshire 03824, United States of America
*
1Corresponding author (e-mail: [email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Practical and effective strategies to manage emerald ash borer (EAB) (Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire; Coleoptera: Buprestidae) are increasingly important given economic and ecological impacts of this invader. While EAB detection remains challenging, tactics are available to protect individual ash (Fraxinus Linnaeus; Oleaceae) trees and slow EAB population growth, thereby delaying ash mortality. Simulations with a coupled map lattice model, parameterised with data from numerous field studies, showed treating trees with a highly effective systemic insecticide (TREE-äge™; emamectin benzoate), would be more effective in slowing EAB population growth than girdling trees to attract ovipositing females then destroying trees before larvae develop, while harvesting ash to reduce available phloem would have the least effect. From 2008 to 2012, cooperators participated in a pilot project to implement an integrated strategy for an EAB infestation in Upper Michigan, United States of America. Ash was inventoried and EAB density monitored using girdled ash detection trees supplemented with baited artificial traps across the >750 km2 project area. While only a tiny fraction of ash trees in the project area were girdled (444–855 trees annually) or injected with TREE-äge™ (<360 roadside trees annually), and treatment distribution was restricted, both treatments slowed EAB population growth. Coupling TREE-äge™ injections with other tactics will likely yield additive or synergistic outcomes.

Type
Original Article
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 147 , Special Issue 3: Emerald Ash Borer , June 2015 , pp. 349 - 358
Copyright
© Entomological Society of Canada 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Subject editor: Krista Ryall

References

Anulewicz, A.C., McCullough, D.G., and Cappaert, D.L. 2007. Emerald ash borer (Agrilus planipennis) density and canopy dieback in North American ash species. Arboriculture and Urban Forestry, 33: 338–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anulewicz, A.C., McCullough, D.G., Cappaert, D.L., and Poland, T.M. 2008. Host range of the emerald ash borer (Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire) (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) in North America: results of multiple-choice field experiments. Environmental Entomology, 37: 230–241.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aukema, J.E., Leung, B., Kovacs, K., Chivers, C., Britton, K.O., Englin, J., et al. 2011. Economic impacts of non-native forest insects in the continental United States. Public Library of Science One, 6: e24587.Google ScholarPubMed
Barclay, H.J. and Li, C. 1991. Combining methods of pest control: minimizing cost during the control program. Theoretical Population Biology, 40: 105–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berec, L., Angulo, E., and Courchamp, F. 2007. Multiple allee effects and population management. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 22: 185–191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burr, S.J. and McCullough, D.G. 2014. Condition of green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica) overstory and regeneration at three stages of the emerald ash borer invasion wave. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 44: 768–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cappaert, D. and McCullough, D.G. 2009. Phenology of Atanycolus cappaerti (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), a native parasitoid of emerald ash borer, Agrilus planipennis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae). The Great Lakes Entomologist, 41: 141–154.Google Scholar
Cappaert, D., McCullough, D.G., Poland, T.M., and Siegert, N.W. 2005. Emerald ash borer in North America: a research and regulatory challenge. American Entomologist, 51: 152–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chimney Sweep. 2014. Sweep’s library: firewood BTU comparison charts [online]. Available from https://chimneysweeponline.com/howood.htm [accessed 4 January 2015].Google Scholar
Crook, D.J., Khrimian, A., Francese, J.A., Fraser, I., Poland, T.M., Sawyer, A.J., et al. 2008. Development of a host-based semiochemical lure for trapping emerald ash borer, Agrilus planipennis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae). Environmental Entomology, 37: 356–365.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crook, D.J. and Mastro, V.C. 2010. Chemical ecology of the emerald ash borer Agrilus planipennis. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 36: 101–112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Groot, P., Grant, G.G., Poland, T.M., Scharbach, R., Buchan, L., Nott, R.W., et al. 2008. Electrophysiological response and attraction of emerald ash borer to green leaf volatiles (GLVs) emitted by host foliage. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 34: 1170–1179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duan, J.J., Bauer, L.S., Abell, K.J., Lelito, J.P., and Van Driesche, R. 2013. Establishment and abundance of Tetrastichus planipennisi (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) in Michigan: potential for success in classical biocontrol of the invasive emerald ash borer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae). Journal of Economic Entomology, 106: 1145–1154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duan, J.J., Bauer, L.S., Abell, K.J., and Van Driesche, R. 2012. Population responses of hymenopteran parasitoids to the emerald ash borer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) in recently invaded areas in north central United States. BioControl, 57: 199–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Federal Register. 2010. 50 CFR Part 17, endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; final revised critical habitat for hine’s emerald dragonfly (Somatochlora hineana); final rule. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service Vol. 75, No. 78/Friday, 23 April 2010 [online]. Available from http://www.fws.gov/midwest/endangered/insects/hed/FRHinesFinalRevisedCH.html [accessed 7 January 2015].Google Scholar
Flower, C.E., Long, L.C., Knight, K.S., Rebbeck, J., Brown, J.S., Gonzalez-Meler, M.A., et al. 2014. Native bark-foraging birds preferentially forage in infected ash (Fraxinus spp.) and prove effective predators of the invasive emerald ash borer (Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire). Forest Ecology and Management, 313: 300–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herms, D.A. and McCullough, D.G. 2014. The emerald ash borer invasion of North America: history, biology, ecology, impacts and management. Annual Review of Entomology, 59: 13–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herms, D.A., McCullough, D.G., Smitley, D.R., Sadof, C.S., and Cranshaw, W. 2014. Insecticide options for protecting ash trees from emerald ash borer, 2nd edition [online]. Available from http://www.emeraldashborer.info [accessed 4 January 2015].Google Scholar
Hunt, L. 2007. Emerald ash borer state update: Ohio. In Proceedings of the emerald ash borer and Asian longhorned beetle research and technology development meeting, Cincinnati, Ohio, 29 October–2 November 2006. Edited by V. Mastro, D. Lance, R. Reardon, and G. Parra. FHTET-2007-04. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team, Morgantown, West Virginia, United States of America. P. 2.Google Scholar
Klooster, W.S., Herms, D.A., Knight, K.S., Herms, C.P., McCullough, D.G., Smith, A., et al. 2014. Ash (Fraxinus spp.) mortality, regeneration, and seed bank dynamics in mixed hardwood forests following invasion by emerald ash borer (Agrilus planipennis). Biological Invasions, 16: 859–873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, K.S., Brown, J.P., and Long, R.P. 2013. Factors affecting the survival of ash (Fraxinus spp.) trees infested by emerald ash borer (Agrilus planipennis). Biological Invasions, 15: 371–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kovacs, K.F., Haight, R.G., McCullough, D.G., Mercader, R.J., Siegert, N.W., and Liebhold, A.M. 2010. Cost of potential emerald ash borer damage in U.S. communities, 2009–2019. Ecological Economics, 69: 569–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kovacs, K.F., Haight, R.G., Mercader, R.J., and McCullough, D.G. 2014. A bioeconomic analysis of an emerald ash borer invasion of an urban forest with multiple jurisdictions. Resource and Energy Economics, 36: 270–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kovacs, K., Mercader, R.J., Haight, R.G., Siegert, N.W., McCullough, D.G., and Liebhold, A.M. 2011. The influence of satellite populations of emerald ash borer on projected economic damage in U.S. communities, 2010–2020. Environmental Management, 92: 2170–2181.Google Scholar
Kreutzweiser, D., Thompson, D., Grimalt, S., Chartrand, D., Good, K., and Scarr, T. 2011. Environmental safety to decomposer invertebrates of azadirachtin (neem) as a systemic insecticide in trees to control emerald ash borer. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 74: 1734–1741.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lindell, C.A., McCullough, D.G., Cappaert, D., Apostolou, N.M., and Roth, M.B. 2008. Factors influencing woodpecker predation on emerald ash borer. The American Midland Naturalist, 159: 434–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, H., Bauer, L.S., Gao, R., Zhao, T., Petrice, T.R., and Haack, R.A. 2003. Exploratory survey for the emerald ash borer, Agrilus planipennis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae), and its natural enemies in China. The Great Lakes Entomologist, 36: 191–204.Google Scholar
McCullough, D.G., Cappaert, D.L., and Poland, T.M. 2005. Using Tempo to control emerald ash borer: a comparison of trunk and foliage sprays. In Proceedings of the emerald ash borer research and technology development meeting, Romulus, Michigan, 5–6 October 2004. Edited by V. Mastro and R. Reardon. FHTET-2004-15. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team, Morgantown, West Virginia, United States of America. Pp. 44–45.Google Scholar
McCullough, D.G., Cappaert, D.L., Poland, T.M., Lewis, P., and Molongoski, J. 2006. Long-term (3 year) evaluation of trunk injections for emerald ash borer control in landscape ash trees. In Proceedings of the emerald ash borer research and technology development meeting, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 26–27 September 2005. Edited by V. Mastro, R. Reardon, and G. Parra. FHTET-2005-16. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team, Morgantown, West Virginia, United States of America. Pp. 31–33.Google Scholar
McCullough, D.G. and Mercader, R.J. 2012. SLAM in an urban forest: evaluation of potential strategies to slow ash mortality caused by emerald ash borer (Agrilus planipennis). International Journal of Pest Management, 58: 9–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCullough, D.G., Poland, T.M., Anulewicz, A.C., and Cappaert, D. 2009a. Emerald ash borer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) attraction to stressed or baited ash trees. Environmental Entomology, 38: 1668–1679.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCullough, D.G., Poland, T.M., Anulewicz, A.C., Lewis, P., and Cappaert, D. 2011a. Evaluation of Agrilus planipennis control provided by emamectin benzoate and two neonicotinoid insecticides, one and two seasons after treatment. Journal of Economic Entomology, 104: 1599–1612.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCullough, D.G., Poland, T.M., and Cappaert, D. 2009b. Attraction of the emerald ash borer to ash trees stressed by girdling, herbicide treatment, or wounding. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 39: 1331–1345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCullough, D.G. and Siegert, N.W. 2007. Estimating potential emerald ash borer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) populations using ash inventory data. Journal of Economic Entomology, 100: 1577–1586.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCullough, D.G., Siegert, N.W., and Bedford, J. 2009c. Slowing ash mortality: a potential strategy to slam emerald ash borer in outlier sites. In Proceedings of the 20th United States Department of Agriculture interagency research forum on invasive species 2009, Annapolis, Maryland, 13–16 January 2009. Edited by K. McManus and K. Gottschalk. Northern Research Station General Technical Report NRS-P-51. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Newtown Square, Pennsylvania, United States of America. Pp. 44–46.Google Scholar
McCullough, D.G., Siegert, N.W., Cappaert, D., Poland, T.M., and McDonald, R. 2007. Sinks, bark, and Garlon: applied studies for emerald ash borer management. In Proceedings of the emerald ash borer and Asian longhorned beetle research and technology development meeting, Cincinnati, Ohio, 29 October–2 November 2006. Edited by V. Mastro, D. Lance, R. Reardon, and G. Parra. FHTET-2007-04. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team, Morgantown, West Virginia, United States of America. Pp. 92–95.Google Scholar
McCullough, D.G., Siegert, N.W., Poland, T.M., Pierce, S.J., and Ahn, S. 2011b. Effects of trap type, placement and ash distribution on emerald ash borer captures in a low density site. Environmental Entomology, 40: 1239–1253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKenzie, N., Helson, B., Thompson, D., Otis, G., McFarlane, J., Buscarini, T., et al. 2010. Azadirachtin: an effective systemic insecticide for control of Agrilus planipennis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae). Journal of Economic Entomology, 103: 708–717.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mercader, R.J., McCullough, D.G., and Bedford, J.M. 2013. A comparison of girdled ash detection trees and baited artificial traps for Agrilus planipennis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) detection. Environmental Entomology, 42: 1027–1039.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mercader, R.J., Siegert, N.W., Liebhold, A.M., and McCullough, D.G. 2011a. Estimating the effectiveness of three potential management options to slow the spread of emerald ash borer populations in localized outlier sites. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 41: 254–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mercader, R.J., Siegert, N.W., Liebhold, A.M., and McCullough, D.G. 2011b. Influence of foraging behavior and host spatial distribution of the localized spread of the emerald ash borer, Agrilus planipennis. Population Ecology, 53: 271–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mercader, R.J., Siegert, N.W., and McCullough, D.G. 2012. Estimating the influence of population density and dispersal behavior on the ability to detect and monitor Agrilus planipennis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) populations. Journal of Economic Entomology, 105: 272–281.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Northeast Timber Exchange 2014. Saw log pricing; July 2014 [online]. Available from http://northeasttimberexchange.com/?page_id=4 [accessed 4 January 2015].Google Scholar
Poland, T.M. and McCullough, D.G. 2006. Emerald ash borer: invasion of the urban forest and the threat to North America’s ash resource. Journal of Forestry, 104: 118–124.Google Scholar
Poland, T.M. and McCullough, D.G. 2010. SLAM: a multiagency pilot project to slow ash mortality caused by emerald ash borer in outlier sites. Newsletter of the Michigan Entomological Society, 55: 4–8.Google Scholar
Poland, T.M. and McCullough, D.G. 2014. Comparison of trap types and colors for capturing emerald ash borer adults at different population densities. Environmental Entomology, 43: 157–170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poland, T.M., McCullough, D.G., and Anulewicz, A.C. 2011. Evaluation of an artificial trap for Agrilus planipennis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) incorporating olfactory and visual cues. Journal of Economic Entomology, 104: 517–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rauscher, K. 2006. The 2005 Michigan emerald ash borer response: an update. In Proceedings of the emerald ash borer research and technology development meeting, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 26–27 September 2005. Edited by V. Mastro, R. Reardon, and G. Parra. FHTET-2005-16. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team, Morgantown, West Virginia, United States of America. P. 1.Google Scholar
Rebek, E.J., Herms, D.A., and Smitley, D.R. 2008. Interspecific variation in resistance to emerald ash borer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) among North American and Asian ash (Fraxinus spp.). Environmental Entomology, 37: 242–246.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rodriguez-Saona, C., Poland, T.M., Miller, J.R., Stelinski, L.L., Grant, G.G., de Groot, P., et al. 2006. Behavioral and electrophysiological responses of the emerald ash borer, Agrilus planipennis, to induced volatiles of Manchurian ash, Fraxinus mandshurica. Chemoecology, 16: 75–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegert, N.W., McCullough, D.G., Poland, T.M., Heyd, R.L., Pierce, S.J., and Xue, Y. 2010a. Effects of clusters of girdled trees on the spread of emerald ash borer in low-density infestations. In Proceedings of the emerald ash borer research and technology development meeting, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 20–21 October 2009. Edited by D. Lance, J. Buck, D. Binion, R. Reardon, and V. Mastro. FHTET-2010-01. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team, Morgantown, West Virginia, United States of America. P. 23.Google Scholar
Siegert, N.W., McCullough, D.G., Williams, D.W., Fraser, I., and Poland, T.M. 2010b. Dispersal of Agrilus planipennis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) from discrete epicenters in two outlier sites. Environmental Entomology, 39: 253–265.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smitley, D.R., Doccola, J.J., and Cox, D.L. 2010. Multiple-year protection of ash trees from emerald ash borer with a single trunk injection of emamectin benzoate, and single year protection with an imidacloprid basal drench. Arboriculture and Urban Forestry, 36: 206–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suckling, D.M., McCullough, D.G., Herms, D.A., and Tobin, P.C. 2012. Combining tactics to exploit allee effects for eradication of alien insect populations. Journal of Economic Entomology, 105: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tanis, S.R. and McCullough, D.G. 2012. Differential persistence of blue ash (Fraxinus quadrangulata) and white ash (Fraxinus americana) following emerald ash borer (Agrilus planipennis) invasion. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 42: 1542–1550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tluczek, A.R., McCullough, D.G., and Poland, T.M. 2011. Influence of host stress on emerald ash borer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) adult density, development, and distribution in Fraxinus pennsylvanica trees. Environmental Entomology, 40: 357–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture. 2007. Proposed release of three parasitoids for the biological control of the emerald ash borer (Agrilus planipennis) in the continental United States. Environmental Assessment [online]. Available from http://www.emeraldashborer.info/files/07-060-1%20ea_leah_environassess.pdf [accessed 11 July 2014].Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture. 2013. Emerald Ash Borer Biological Control Release and Recovery Guidelines [online]. United States Department of Agriculture-Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service/Agricultural Research Service/Forest Service, Riverdale, Maryland, United States of America. Available from http://www.aphis.usda.gov/plant_health/plant_pest_info/emerald_ash_b/downloads/EAB-FieldRelease-Guidelines.pdf [accessed 27 June 2014].Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture. 2014. 2014 emerald ash borer survey guidelines [online]. United States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Plant Protection and Quarantine. Available from http://www.aphis.usda.gov/plant_health/plant_pest_info/emerald_ash_b/downloads/survey_guidelines.pdf [accessed 11 July 2014].Google Scholar
Van Atta, A.R., Hauer, R.H., and Schuettpelz, N.M. 2012. Economic analysis of emerald ash borer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) management options. Journal of Economic Entomology, 105: 196–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, J.W. 1959. Silvical characteristics of white ash (Fraxinus americana). United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station. Station Paper NE-123. Upper Darby, Pennsylvania, United States of America. Pp. 1–19.Google Scholar
Yu, C.M. 1992. Agrilus marcopoli Obenberger. In Forest Insects of China, 2nd edition. Edited by G. Xiao. China Forest Publishing House, Beijing, China. Pp. 400–401. (In Chinese).Google Scholar