Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-d8cs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T09:19:08.981Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Correction to “A Comparison of Radiograph Analysis and Bark Dissection in Estimating Numbers of Western Pine Beetle”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

C. J. DeMars Jr.
C. J. DeMars Jr.
Affiliation:
U. S. Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Berkeley, California
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It has come to my attention that results I reported (DeMars 1963) were incorrect.

In Table I the values for samples 4 through 7 in column 4 (Larvae-Dead-Rad.) should read 1, 10, 7, and 4 instead of 10, 7, 4, and 0. In Table II the values for sample 13 in columns 8 and 12 (Beetles of all stages-Live and Total-Rad.) should read 102 instead of 103.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 97 , Issue 2 , February 1965 , pp. 206
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

DeMars, C. J. Jr., 1963. A comparison of radiograph analysis and bark dissection in estimating numbers of western pine beetle. Canad. Ent. 95: 1112–1116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar