Published online by Cambridge University Press: 31 May 2012
In my original description of the above species I rather doubtfully associated with the male holotype and paratypes two females, largely on account of similarity of locality data; the genitalia of one of these was figured on Plate III, fig. 6. I now find that this association was incorrect and that the name quadruplex must be restricted to the male sex of the original description.
* Contribution No. 2280, Division of Entomology, Science Service, Department of Agriculture, Ottawa, Canada.