Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:13:59.260Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

CONTACT TOXICITY OF TWENTY-ONE INSECTICIDES TO ADULTS OF THE CARROT RUST FLY (DIPTERA: PSILIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

C.R. Harris ,
S.A. Turnbull  and
D.G.R. McLeod
C.R. Harris
Affiliation:
Research Centre, Agriculture Canada, University Sub Post Office, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 5B7
S.A. Turnbull
Affiliation:
Research Centre, Agriculture Canada, University Sub Post Office, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 5B7
D.G.R. McLeod
Affiliation:
Research Centre, Agriculture Canada, University Sub Post Office, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 5B7
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Direct-contact toxicity tests were done with 21 insecticides to assess their potential for controlling adults of the carrot rust fly, Psila rosae (Fabricius) (Diptera: Psilidae). Chlorpyrifos, chlorfenvinphos, fensulfothion, carbofuran, cypermethrin, and mevinphos were 1.2 to 2.8 ×, and deltamethrin 22 ×, more toxic to flies (24–48 h old) than was diazinon, the insecticide currently used most commonly to suppress first-generation adults of the carrot rust fly.

Résumé

On a testé la toxicité de contact direct de 21 insecticides afin d'évaluer leur pouvoir de répression des adultes de la mouche de la carotte, Psila rosae (Fabricius) (Diptera : Psilidae). Le chlorpyrifos, le chlorfenvinphos, le fensulfothion, le carbofuran, le cypermethrin, et le mevinphos se sont avérés de 1,2 à 1,8 fois, et le deltamethrin 22 fois, plus toxiques vis-à-vis des mouches de 24 à 48 h, que le diazinon, l'insecticide actuellement le plus utilisé contre les adultes de la première génération de la mouche de la carotte.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 117 , Issue 8 , August 1985 , pp. 1025 - 1027
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, W.S. 1925. A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. J. econ. Ent. 18: 262–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finney, D.J. 1952. Probit analysis. A statistical treatment of the sigmoid response curve. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, England. 318 pp.Google Scholar
Harris, C.R. 1977. Insecticide resistance in soil insects attacking crops. pp. 321–351 in Watson, D.L. and Brown, A.W.A. (Eds.), Pesticide management and insecticide resistance. Academic Press, New York. 638 pp.Google Scholar
Harris, C.R., Svec, H.J., and Mazurek, J.H.. 1963. Susceptibility of seed maggot flies, Hylemya spp., to contact applications of aldrin, DDT, and diazinon. J. econ. Ent. 56: 563–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLeod, D.G.R., Whistlecraft, J.W., and Harris, C.R.. 1985. An improved rearing procedure for the carrot rust fly (Diptera: Psilidae) with observations on life history and conditions controlling diapause induction and termination. Can. Ent. 117: 1017–1024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niemczyk, H.D. 1965. Contact toxicity of ten insecticides to adults of the carrot rust fly. J. econ. Ent. 58: 423–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niemczyk, H.D. and Harris, C.R.. 1962. Evidence of carrot rust fly resistance to aldrin and heptachlor in Canada. J. econ. Ent. 55: 560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, A.B. 1976. Carrot rust fly: chemical control of first generation larvae in organic soil in Ontario. J. econ. Ent. 69: 282–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, A.B. 1981. Carrot rust fly: monitoring adults to determine whether to apply insecticides. J. econ. Ent. 74: 54–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, A.R., and Harris, C.R. 1982. An indication of phorate-tolerance in a population of carrot fly from East Anglia. Tests Agrochem. Cultivars 3: 18–19.Google Scholar