Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:40:37.586Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

COMPARISONS OF THE ABUNDANCE OF THE SPECIES COMPOSING THE FOLIAGE INHABITING FAUNA OF APPLE TREES1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

F. T. Lord
Affiliation:
Research Station, Canada Department of Agriculture, Kentville, Nova Scotia

Abstract

A 5 year study of the foliage inhabiting fauna of young apple trees which had never been treated with insecticides or miticides showed there were large numbers of species varying considerably in quantity. The study also showed that the manner in which the foliage is distributed by cluster type and the distribution of the many species on the clusters are important factors in the sampling of mixed populations of arthropods.The leaf clusters were classified into six types based on stem length and on the presence or absence of fruit. The mean number of leaves per cluster for all types combined increased until mid July but no further increase occurred after that. The variation in leaves per cluster on the longer clusters, however, continued throughout the summer even though the mean number of leaves per cluster did not.The relative abundance of each of the arthropod species, whether it was identifiable to name or not, was given a quantitative rating by using random clusters as a common sampling unit. Eleven orders, 38 families, and over 100 species were recorded. The species making up the fauna were nearly all at a low density and in general remained low during the study. All the common pests were found but only four were at a level where economic damage to the foliage resulted. Very few of the species were present in numbers sufficiently large for analysis of the factors influencing their population density or theirA list is given of those species which were sufficiently abundant to show that differences in preference for some cluster types over others is common.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Colleyer, Elsie. 1949. The predator aspect of the fruit tree red spider problem. A. Rep. East Malling Res. Stn, 1948, P. 108110.Google Scholar
Dice, L. R. 1952. Natural communities. Chap. XIV, p. 321357. University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Graham, S. A. 1956. Forest insect and the law of natural compensations. Can. Ent. 88: 4555.Google Scholar
LeRoux, E. J. 1960. Effects of “modified” and “commercial” spray programs on the fauna of apple orchards in Quebec. Ann. ent. Soc.Queb. 6: 87121.Google Scholar
Lord, F. T. 1965. Sampling predator populations on apple trees in Nova Scotia. Can. Ent 97: 287298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lord, F. T. 1968. Influence of the proportion of fruiting to non-fruiting clusters on the distribution of insect predators on apple trees. Can. Ent. 100: 308312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massee, A. M. 1948. Notes on the insect fauna of sprayed and unsprayed apple orchards. A. Rep. East Malling Res. Stn, 1947, p. 132134.Google Scholar
Massee, A. M. 1958. The effect on the balance of arthropod populations in orchards arising from the unrestricted use of chemicals. Proc. 10th int. Congr. Ent. (1956), p. 163168.Google Scholar
Oatman, E. R., Legner, E. F., and Brooks, R. F.. 1964. An ecological study of arthropod populations on apple in northeastern Wisconsin. Insect species present. J. econ. Ent. 57(4): 978983.Google Scholar
Stultz, H. T. 1955. The influence of sparay programs on the fauna os apple orchards in Nova Socitia. VIII. Natural enemies of the eye-spotted budmoth, Splionata ocellana (D. & S.) (Lepidoptera: Olethreutidae). Can. Ent. 87: 7985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar