Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T09:24:17.493Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE COMPARATIVE DEVELOPMENT OF TWO EGG PARASITES OF RHODNIUS PROLIXUS (HEMIPTERA: REDUVIIDAE), VECTOR OF CHAGAS’ DISEASE IN VENEZUELA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

D. Gerling ,
J. E. Conde  and
J. E. Rabinovich
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A study was made of the developmental biology of two parasite species that attack the eggs of Rhodnius prolixus. The gregarious encyrtid Ooencyrtus trinidadensis has a life cycle of 14 days, from egg to adult. The larvae, which hatch after a 42 h incubation, are attached to the egg chorion during the first and second instars. The solitary scelionid Telenomus costa-limai has a longer life cycle (20 days), but its eggs hatch after only 17 h, and its first-instar larva is equipped with large mandibles. It is possible that this free larva is better equipped for elimination of multiple or supernumerary parasites than that of O. trinidadensis. The characteristic features of the larvae of each parasite species are also described.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 108 , Issue 4 , April 1976 , pp. 427 - 432
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bartlett, B. R. and Ball, J. C.. 1964. The developmental biologies of two encyrtid parasites of Coccus hesperidum and their intrinsic competition. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 57: 496–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, J. C. 1913. Descriptions of new Hymenoptera. Proc. U.S. natn. Mus. 46: 347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feliciangelli, M. D. 1973. Hallazgo de huevos de Rhodnius prolixus parasitados naturalement por microhimenopteros. Revta Inst. Med. Trop. Sao Paulo 15(4): 235–238.Google Scholar
Gerling, D. 1972. The developmental biology of Telenomus remus Nixon (Hym. Scelionidae). Bull. ent. Res. 61: 385–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerling, D. and Schwartz, A.. 1974. Host selection by Telenomus remus, a parasite of Spodoptera littoralis. Entomologia exp. appl. 17: 391–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maple, J. D. 1947. The eggs and first instar larvae of Encyrtidae and their morphological adaptations for respiration. Univ. Calif. Publs Ent. 8(2): 25–122.Google Scholar
Ortiz, I. and Alvarez, A.. 1959. Nota preliminar sobre un nuevo Microhimenoptero Neotrópico de la familia Scelionidae parásito de los huevos de Rhodnius prolixus (Stål). Rev. San. y Asis. Soc. 24(3,4): 371–378.Google Scholar
Rothschild, G. H. L. 1970. Parasites of rice stemborers in Sarawak (Malaysien Borneo). Entomophaga 15: 21–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turnbull, A. L. and Chant, D. A.. 1961. The practice and theory of biological control of insects in Canada. Can. J. Zool. 39: 697–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watt, K. E. F. 1965. Community stability and the strategy of biological control. Can. Ent. 97: 887–895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar