Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T06:19:27.889Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE COLUMBIAN TIMBER BEETLE, CORTHYLUS COLUMBIANUS (COLEOPTERA: SCOLYTIDAE): IV. INTRASTAND POPULATION DISTRIBUTION1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Robert G. Crozier  and
Ronald L. Giese
Robert G. Crozier
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana
Ronald L. Giese
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Corthylus columbianus Hopkins became permanently established in. the study area in southern Indiana during 1940–62. Three epicenters were present in 1945. Two of these shifted, expanded, and merged the following year. The two remaining epicenters merged during the first outbreak. As the population declined after the first outbreak and began retreating toward the center of the stand, two epicenters were again definable. One of these alternately expanded and contracted for several years demonstrating, qualitatively, that epicenters are definable and dynamic in time and space. That is, any particular locus undergoes some degree of areal shift each year and varies in size through time.

Quantitatively, attack and egg cradle densities within the epicenters follow the same pattern. Densities were generally lowest in the newly invaded areas. Except during epiphytotics, highest density areas were usually aggregated near the center of the stand, but shifted from year to year. For example, only one tree contained a high density in 1954; by 1956 the high density area had shifted spatially and encompassed 10% of the study trees.

An “indigenous population” of C. columbianus is an areal concept. The insect withdrew to certain areas, not certain trees, during times of low population numbers. The “brood” tree concept–a single tree containing all or a majority of the population during times of low population numbers–is rejected in the case of the Columbian timber beetle for the study area in southern Indiana.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 99 , Issue 11 , November 1967 , pp. 1203 - 1214
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Crozier, R. G., and Giese, R. L.. 1966. The Columbian timber beetle, Corthylus columbianus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). III. Definition of epiphytotics. J. econ. Ent. 60: 55–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giese, R. L. 1962. Climatic release of the Columbian timber beetle. Bull. ent. Soc. Am. 8: 130, 161 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Kabir, A. K. M. F., and Giese, R. L.. The Columbian timber beetle Corthylus columbianus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). I. Biology of the beetle. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 59: 883–894 (1966 a).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
II. Fungi and staining associated with the beetle in soft maple. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 59: 894–902 (1966 b).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucht, D. D., and Giese, R. L.. 1961. Spatial distribution of the Columbian timber beetle in bottomland hardwoods. Proc. N. Cent. Br. ent. Soc. Am. 16: 87–88.Google Scholar
Pettinger, L. F., and Giese, R. L.. 1963. Host growth related to population density of the Columbian timber beetle. Proc. N. Cent. Br. ent. Soc. Am. 18: 68.Google Scholar
Stark, R. W. 1959. Population dynamics of the lodgepole needle miner (Recurvaria starki Freeman), in Canadian Rocky Mountain Parks. Can. J. Zool. 37: 917–943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wellington, W. G. 1954. Atmospheric circulation processes and insect ecology. Can. Ent. 86: 312–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar