Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
Owen, Robin E.
Rodd, F. H.
and
Plowright, R. C.
1980.
Sex ratios in bumble bee colonies: Complications due to orphaning?.
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology,
Vol. 7,
Issue. 4,
p.
287.
Pomeroy, N.
and
Plowright, R. C.
1980.
MAINTENANCE OF BUMBLE BEE COLONIES IN OBSERVATION HIVES (HYMENOPTERA: APIDAE).
The Canadian Entomologist,
Vol. 112,
Issue. 3,
p.
321.
Pomeroy, Nelson
1981.
Use of natural sites and field hives by a long-tongued bumble beeBombus ruderatus.
New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research,
Vol. 24,
Issue. 3-4,
p.
409.
Owen, Robin E.
and
Plowright, R. C.
1982.
Worker-queen conflict and male parentage in bumble bees.
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology,
Vol. 11,
Issue. 2,
p.
91.
Owen, Robin E
1985.
The opportunity for polymorphism and genic variation in social hymenoptera with worker-produced males.
Heredity,
Vol. 54,
Issue. 1,
p.
25.
Lee, P. C.
and
Winston, M. L.
1985.
The influence of swarm size on brood production and emergent worker weight in newly founded honey bee colonies (Apis mellifera L.).
Insectes Sociaux,
Vol. 32,
Issue. 1,
p.
96.
MORITZ, ROBIN F.A.
1986.
Bee Genetics and Breeding.
p.
121.
Arretz, P. V.
and
Macfarlane, R. P.
1986.
The Introduction ofBombus Ruderatusto Chile for Red Clover Pollination.
Bee World,
Vol. 67,
Issue. 1,
p.
15.
Fisher, Richard M.
1987.
Queen-worker conflict and social parasitism in bumble bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae).
Animal Behaviour,
Vol. 35,
Issue. 4,
p.
1026.
Fisher, Richard M.
1987.
Temporal dynamics of facultative social parasitism in bumble bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae).
Animal Behaviour,
Vol. 35,
Issue. 6,
p.
1628.
SCHMID‐HEMPEL, PAUL
and
SCHMID‐HEMPEL, REGULA
1988.
Parasitic flies (Conopidae, Diptera) may be important stress factors for the ergonomics of their bumblebee hosts.
Ecological Entomology,
Vol. 13,
Issue. 4,
p.
469.
Fisher, Richard M.
and
Pomeroy, Nelson
1990.
Sex discrimination and infanticide by queens of the bumble bee Bombus terrestris (Hymenoptera: Apidae).
Animal Behaviour,
Vol. 39,
Issue. 4,
p.
801.
Wolf, Thomas J.
and
Schmid-Hempel, Paul
1990.
On the integration of individual foraging strategies with colony ergonomics in social insects: nectar-collection in honeybees.
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology,
Vol. 27,
Issue. 2,
p.
103.
Ratnieks, Francis L.W.
and
Reeve, H.Kern
1992.
Conflict in single-queen hymenopteran societies: the structure of conflict and processes that reduce conflict in advanced eusocial species.
Journal of Theoretical Biology,
Vol. 158,
Issue. 1,
p.
33.
Eckert, C. D.
Winston, M. L.
and
Ydenberg, R. C.
1994.
The relationship between population size, amount of brood, and individual foraging behaviour in the honey bee, Apis mellifera L..
Oecologia,
Vol. 97,
Issue. 2,
p.
248.
Bourke, Andrew F. G.
1997.
Sex ratios in bumble bees.
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences,
Vol. 352,
Issue. 1364,
p.
1921.
BUTTERMORE, R. E.
1997.
Observations of Successful Bombus terrestris (L.) (Hymenoptera: Apidae) Colonies in Southern Tasmania.
Australian Journal of Entomology,
Vol. 36,
Issue. 3,
p.
251.
Beekman, M
van Stratum, P
and
Lingeman, R
2000.
Artificial rearing of bumble bees (Bombus terrestris) selects against heavy queens.
Journal of Apicultural Research,
Vol. 39,
Issue. 1-2,
p.
61.
Brown, Mark J. F.
Schmid‐Hempel, Regula
and
Schmid‐Hempel, Paul
2003.
Strong context‐dependent virulence in a host–parasite system: reconciling genetic evidence with theory.
Journal of Animal Ecology,
Vol. 72,
Issue. 6,
p.
994.
Wenseleers, T.
Helanterä, H.
Hart, A.
and
Ratnieks, F. L. W.
2004.
Worker reproduction and policing in insect societies: an ESS analysis.
Journal of Evolutionary Biology,
Vol. 17,
Issue. 5,
p.
1035.