Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:56:53.109Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Biology and Behaviour of the European Pine Shoot Moth, Rhyacionia buoliana (Schiff.), in Southern Ontario I. Adult1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

P. J. Pointing
Affiliation:
Forest Insect Laboratory, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario

Extract

The European pine shoot moth, Rhyacionia buoliana (Schiff.), has been recognized as a pest of pine plantations since it was described in 1776. Neugebauer (1952) stated that 32 susceptible pine species were known and that scarcely any species were rejected by the insect. Following its accidental introduction into North America about 50 years ago (Busck, 1914) the shoot moth became a serious pest of red pine, Pinus resinosa Ait., which appears to be the most susceptible species (Heikkenen and Miller, 1959). Watson (1947) described the shoot moth as “the most destructive insect affecting hard pines in southern Ontario, and the most difficult to control”. Plantations have been damaged so severely that the planting of red pine has been virtually discontinued within the pest's range.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1961

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Batzer, H. O., and Benjamin, D. M.. 1954. Cold temperature tolerance of the European pine shoot moth in lower Michigan. J. Econ. Ent. 47: 801803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benjamin, D. M., Smith, P. W., and Bachman, R. L.. 1959. The European pine shoot moth and its relation to pines in Wisconsin. Wise. Cons. Dept. Tech. Bull. 19: 723.Google Scholar
Brooks, C. C., and Brown, J. M. B.. 1936. Studies on the pine shoot moth (Evetria buoliana Schiff.). Bull. Forestry Comm. 16: 146.Google Scholar
Busck, A. 1914. A destructive pine-moth introduced from Europe (Evetria buoliana Schiffermiller). J. Econ. Ent. 7: 340341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butcher, J. W., and Haynes, Dean L.. 1958. Fall control of European pine shoot moth on pine seedlings. Michigan Agric. Expt. Sta. Quart. Bull. 41: 264–8.Google Scholar
Butcher, J. W., and Haynes, Dean L.. 1959. Experiments with new insecticides for control of European pine shoot moth. Michigan Agric. Expt. Sta. Quart. Bull. 41: 734–44.Google Scholar
Butcher, J. W., and Haynes, Dean L.. 1960. Influence of timing and insect biology on the effectiveness of insecticides applied for control of European pine shoot moth, Rhyacionia buoliana. J. Econ. Ent. 53: 349354.Google Scholar
Butovitsch, V. 1936. Studier över tallskottvecklaren, Evetria buoliana (Schiff.). Del. 1, Medd. Skögsförsökanst Stockholm, 29: 471556. (German Summary).Google Scholar
Connola, D. P., Yops, C. J., and Smith, W. E.. 1954. European pine shoot moth control tests. J. Econ. Ent. 47(2): 299302.Google Scholar
Coppel, H. C., and Arthur, A. P.. 1954. Notes on introduced parasites of the European pine shoot moth, Rhyacionia buoliana (Schiff.) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), in Ontario. Ann. Rept. Ent. Soc. Ontario 84 (1953): 155158.Google Scholar
de Gryse, J. J. 1932. Note on the early stages of the European pine shoot moth. Canadian Ent. 64: 169173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escherich, K. 1931. Die Forstinsekten Mittleuropas T.III: 283292Berlin.Google Scholar
Flink, P. R., and Brigham, P. M.. 1959. Preliminary report on red pine nursery stock fumigation. J. For. 57(9): 662–63.Google Scholar
Friend, R. B., and West, A. S.. 1933. The European pine shoot moth (Rhyacionia buoliana Schiff.) with special reference to its occurrence in the Eli Whitney Forest. Yale Univ. School For. Bull. 37: 165.Google Scholar
Friend, R. B., and Plumb, G. H.. 1938. Control of the European pine shoot moth. J. Econ. Ent. 31: 176183.Google Scholar
Green, G. W., Baldwin, W. F., and Sullivan, C. R.. 1957. The use of radioactive cobalt in studies of the dispersal of adult females of the European pine shoot moth, Rhyacionia buoliana (Schiff.). Canadian Ent. 89: 379383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenfield, W. P. 1914. The pine tortrix moth. Quart. Jour. For. 8: 2530.Google Scholar
Haynes, Dean L., Guyer, Gordon, and Butcher, J. W.. 1958. Use of systemic insecticides for the control of the European pine shoot moth infesting red pine. Michigan Agric. Expt. Sta. Quart. Bull. 41: 269–78.Google Scholar
Heikkenen, H. J., and Miller, W. E.. 1959. European pine shoot moth damage as related to red pine growth, J. For. 57(12): 912914.Google Scholar
Hutchings, C. B. 1926. The shade tree insects of eastern Canada for the year 1925, with remarks on their activities and prevalence. 18th Ann. Rpt. Que. Soc. Prot. Plants, 1925–26: 113–117. Rev. Appl. Ent., 15: 530.Google Scholar
Juillet, J. A. 1959. Morphology of immature stages, life-history, and behaviour of three hymenopterous parasites of the European pine shoot moth, Rhyacionia buoliana (Schiff.) (Lepidoptera: Olethreutidae). Canadian Ent. 91: 709719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juillet, J. A. 1960a. Immature stages, life histories and behaviour of two hymenopterous parasites of the European pine shoot moth, Rhyacionia buoliana (Schiff.) (Lepidoptera: Olethreutidae). Canadian Ent. 92: 342346.Google Scholar
Juillet, J. A. 1960b. Resistance to low temperatures of the overwintering stage of two introduced parasites of the European pine shoot moth, Rhyacionia buoliana (Schiff.) (Lepidoptera: Olethreutidae). Canadian Ent. 92: 701704.Google Scholar
McLaine, L. S. 1926. A preliminary announcement of the outbreak of the European pine shoot moth. 56th Ann. Rpt. Ent. Soc. Ontario: 7172.Google Scholar
Miller, W. E., and Neiswander, R. B.. 1955. Biology and control of the European pine shoot moth. Ohio Agric. Expt. Sta. Res. Bull. 760, 31 pp.Google Scholar
Neugebauer, W. O. 1949. Das Problem der Indifferenz von Forstinsekten unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Ökologie des Kieferntriebwicklers. Verhandl. deut. Ges. angew. Entomol., 103110.Google Scholar
Neugebauer, W. O. 1952. Die Bekämpfung des Kieferntriebwicklers. Forstarchiv, 23: 159165.Google Scholar
Rudolf, P. O. 1951. Red pine and the European pine shoot moth in Southern Michigan. Mich. Acad. Sci., Arts and Letters, 35: 6167.Google Scholar
Stearns, L. A. 1953. The biology and control of the Nantucket pine moth and the European pine shoot moth. J. Econ. Ent. 46(4): 690692.Google Scholar
Vilmourin, de P. L. 1917. Note sur les dégats causés par la tordeuse des bourgeons du pin (E. buoliana) dans les collections de Verrières. Bull. Soc. Path. Veg. France T. IV. 12: 83.Google Scholar
Voûte, A. D. 1957. Regulierung der Bevölkerungsdichte von schädlichen Insekten auf geringer Höhe durch Nährpflanze (Myelophilus piniperda L., Retinta buoliana Schiff., Diprion sertifer (Geoff.) Z. angew. Ent. 41: 172178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, E. B. 1947. Forest Insect Survey. Can. Dept. Agr. Div. For. Biol. Bi-Mon. Prog. Rept. 3(5).Google Scholar
Watson, W. Y., and Arthur, A. P.. 1958. Parasites of the European pine shoot moth, Rhyacionia buoliana (Schiff.), in Ontario. Canadian Ent. 91: 478484.Google Scholar
West, A. S. 1936. Winter mortality of larvae of the European pine shoot moth, Rhyacionia buoliana (Schiff.), in Connecticut. Ent. Soc. Amer. Ann. 29: 438448.Google Scholar