Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:01:26.989Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bioclimatic approach to assessing the potential impact of climate change on two flea beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) species in Canada

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 August 2017

O. Olfert ,
R.M. Weiss ,
R.H. Elliott  and
J.J. Soroka
O. Olfert*
Affiliation:
Saskatoon Research and Development Centre, 107 Science Place, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 0X2, Canada
R.M. Weiss
Affiliation:
Saskatoon Research and Development Centre, 107 Science Place, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 0X2, Canada
R.H. Elliott
Affiliation:
Saskatoon Research and Development Centre, 107 Science Place, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 0X2, Canada
J.J. Soroka
Affiliation:
Saskatoon Research and Development Centre, 107 Science Place, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 0X2, Canada
*
1Corresponding author (e-mail: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Both the striped flea beetle, Phyllotreta striolata (Fabricius), and crucifer flea beetle, Phyllotreta cruciferae (Goeze) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), are invasive alien species to North America. In western Canada, they are the most significant insect pests of cruciferous (Brassicaceae) crops. Climate is the one of the most dominant factors regulating the geographic distribution and population density of most insect species. Recent bioclimatic simulation models of the two flea beetle species fostered a better understanding of how the two species responded to selected climate variables. They demonstrated that selected climate variables increased population densities and geographic range of the two species. General circulation model inputs were applied in this study to assess the impact of a changing climate on the response of P. cruciferae and P. striolata populations. Model output, using the climate change scenarios, predicted that both P. cruciferae and P. striolata populations will shift north in future climates and the degree of geographic overlap between these two species will be greater than for current climate. This suggests that the two species could potentially cause economic losses over an expanded area in the future.

Type
Behaviour & Ecology
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 149 , Issue 5 , October 2017 , pp. 616 - 627
Copyright
© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Subject editor: Kevin Floate

References

Antwi, F.B. and Reddy, G.V.P. 2016. Efficacy of entomopathogenic nematodes and sprayable polymer gel against crucifer flea beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) on canola. Journal of Economic Entomology, 109: 1706–1712.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beirne, B.P. 1971. Pest insects of annual crop plants in Canada. Part I. Lepidoptera; II, Diptera; III, Coleoptera. Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada, 103(Supplement S78): 1–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgess, L. 1977. Flea beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) attacking rape crops in the Canadian prairie provinces. The Canadian Entomologist, 109: 21–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cárcamo, H.A., Otani, J.K., Dosdall, L.M., Blackshaw, R.E., Clayton, G.W., Harker, K.N., et al. 2008. Effects of seeding date and canola species on seedling damage by flea beetles in three ecoregions. Journal of Applied Entomology, 132: 623–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CliMond. 2017. Global climatologies for bioclimate modelling. Available from. http://www.climond.org [accessed 17 November 2015].Google Scholar
Dosdall, L.M. and Stevenson, F.C. 2005. Managing flea beetles (Phyllotreta spp.) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) in canola with seeding date, plant density, and seed treatment. Agronomy Journal, 97: 1570–1578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Global Biodiversity Information Facility. 2015. GBIF data portal. Available from http://www.gbif.org [accessed 17 November 2015].Google Scholar
Haye, T., Olfert, O., Weiss, R.M., Gariepy, T.D., Broadbent, B., and Kuhlmann, U. 2013. Bioclimatic analyses of distributions of a parasitoid Peristenus digoneutis and its host species Lygus spp. in Europe and North America. Agricultural and Forest Entomology, 15: 43–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kielen, A. 2012. Flea beetles: populations are shifting. Alberta Farmer. September 13, 2012. Available from http://www.albertafarmexpress.ca/2012/09/13/flea-beetles-populations-are-shifting/ [accessed 20 February 2016].Google Scholar
Kirkwood, V., Bootsma, A., de Jong, R., Dumanski, J., Hiley, J.C., Huffman, E.C., et al. 1993. Agroecological resource area databases for the prairies: user’s manual. Centre for Land and Biological Resources Research Contribution 93-17. Technical Bulletin 1993-13E. Centre for Land and Biological Resources Research, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
Knodel, J.J. and Olson, D.L. 2002. Crucifer flea beetle: biology and integrated pest management in canola. Available from www.ag.ndsu.edu/extensionentomology/field-crops-insect-pests/Documents/canola/crucifer-flea-beetle-biology-and-integrated-pest-management-in-canola [accessed 5 January 2016].Google Scholar
Knodel, J.J., Olson, D.L., Hanson, B.K., and Henson, R.A. 2008. Impact of planting dates and insecticide strategies for managing crucifer flea beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) in spring-planted canola. Journal of Economic Entomology, 101: 810–821.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kriticos, D.J., Webber, B.L., Leriche, A., Ota, N., Macadam, I., Bathols, J., and Scott, J.K. 2012. CliMond: global high-resolution historical and future scenario climate surfaces for bioclimatic modelling. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 3: 53–64.Google Scholar
Mika, A.M. and Newman, J.A. 2010. Climate change scenarios and models yield conflicting predictions about the future risk of an invasive species in North America. Agricultural and Forest Entomology, 12: 213–221.Google Scholar
Mika, A.M., Weiss, R.M., Olfert, O., Hallett, R.H., and Newman, J.A. 2008. Will climate change be beneficial or detrimental to the invasive swede midge in North America? Contrasting predictions using climate projections from different general circulation models. Global Change Biology, 14: 1721–1733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milbrath, L.R., Weiss, M.J., and Schatz, B.G. 1995. Influence of tillage system, planting date, and oilseed crucifers on flea beetle populations (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). The Canadian Entomologist, 127: 289–293.Google Scholar
Nakicenovic, N. and Swart, R. 2000. Special report on emissions scenarios. A special report of the working group III of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
Olfert, O., Haye, T., Weiss, R.M., Kriticos, D.J., and Kuhlmann, U. 2016. Modelling the potential impact of climate change on future spatial and temporal patterns of biological control agents: Peristenus digoneutis (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) as a case study. The Canadian Entomologist, 148: 579–594.Google Scholar
Olfert, O. and Weiss, R.M. 2006. Impact of climate change on potential distributions and relative abundances of Oulema melanopus, Meligethes viridescens and Ceutorhyncus obstrictus in Canada. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 113: 295–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olfert, O., Weiss, R.M., and Elliott, R.H. 2015. Bioclimatic approach to assessing the potential impact of climate change on wheat midge (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) in North America. The Canadian Entomologist, 148: 52–67.Google Scholar
Olfert, O., Weiss, R.M., Elliott, R.H., and Soroka, J.J. 2017. Bioclimatic approach to assessing factors influencing shifts in geographic distribution and density of two flea beetle species (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) in North America. The Canadian Entomologist, in press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olfert, O., Weiss, R.M., and Kriticos, D. 2011. Application of general circulation models to assess the potential impact of climate change on potential distribution and relative abundance of Melanoplus sanguinipes (Fabricius) (Orthoptera: Acrididae) in North America. Psyche, article ID 980372. Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/980372 [accessed 5 May 2015].Google Scholar
Olfert, O., Weiss, R.M., Turkington, K., Beckie, H., and Kriticos, D. 2012. Bioclimatic approach to assessing the potential impact of climate change on representative crop pests in North America. In Climate change and the Canadian agricultural environment. Topics in Canadian weed science, Volume 8. Edited by A.J.A. Ivany and R.E. Blackshaw. Canadian Weed Science Society, Pinawa, Manitoba, Canada. Pp 47–69.Google Scholar
Pearson, R.G., Dawson, T.P., Berry, P.M., and Harrison, P.A. 2002. SPECIES: a spatial evaluation of climate impact on the envelope of species. Ecological Modelling, 154: 289–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reddy, G.V.P., Tangtrakulwanich, K., Wu, S., Miller, J.H., Ophus, V.L., and Prewett, J. 2014. Sustainable management tactics for control of Phyllotreta cruciferae (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) on canola in Montana. Journal of Economic Entomology, 107: 661–666.Google Scholar
Soroka, J.J. 2012. Potential flea beetle species composition shift in prairie canola. Final report to SaskCanola. Project CARP 2009-6 [online]. Available from. http://www.saskcanola.com/research/potential-flea-beetle-species-composition-shift-in-prairie-canola [accessed 24 February, 2017].Google Scholar
Soroka, J.J. 2013. Phyllotreta cruciferae (Goeze), crucifer flea beetle and Phyllotreta striolata (Fabricius), striped flea beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). In Biological control programmes in Canada 2001–2012. Edited by P.G. Mason and D.R. Gillespie. CAB International, Wallingford, United Kingdom. Pp 248–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soroka, J.J. and Elliott, R.H. 2011. Innovative methods for managing flea beetles in canola. Prairie Soils and Crops, 4: 1–7. Available from. http://www.prairiesoilsandcrops.ca [accessed 20 February 2016].Google Scholar
Sutherst, R.W., Maywald, G.F., and Kriticos, D.J. 2007. CLIMEX version 3 user’s guide. Hearne Scientific Software Pty, Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
Tansey, J.A., Dosdall, L.M., Keddie, B.A., and Sarfraz, R.M. 2008. Differences in Phyllotreta cruciferae and Phyllotreta striolata (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) responses to neonicotinoid seed treatments. Journal of Economic Entomology, 101: 159–167.Google Scholar
Thuiller, W. 2004. Patterns and uncertainties of species’ range shifts under climate change. Global Change Biology, 10: 2020–2027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turnock, W.J., Lamb, R.J., and Bilodeau, R.J. 1987. Abundance, winter survival, and spring emergence of flea beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) in a Manitoba grove. The Canadian Entomologist, 119: 419–426.Google Scholar
Urquizo, N., Bastedo, J., Brydges, T., and Shear, H. 2000. Ecological assessment of the Boreal Shield Ecozone. Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
Wylie, H.G. 1979. Observations on distribution, seasonal life history, and abundance of flea beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) that infest rape crops in Manitoba. The Canadian Entomologist, 111: 1345–1353.Google Scholar
Wylie, H.G., Turnock, W.J., and Burgess, L. 1984. Phyllotreta spp., flea beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). In Biological control programmes against insects and weeds in Canada 1969–1980. Edited by J.S. Kelleher and M.A. Hulme. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough, United Kingdom. Pp 73–76.Google Scholar