Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T19:37:46.613Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ASPECTS OF MATING IN THE SPRUCE BUDWORM, CHORISTONEURA FUMIFERANA (LEPIDOPTERA: TORTRICIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

I. Outram
I. Outram
Affiliation:
Forest Research Laboratory, Canadian Forestry Service, Fredericton, New Brunswick
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Normal matings of Choristoneura fumiferana (Clem.) resulted in the transfer of single, persistent spermatophores. The mean duration of copulation was 4 hours with a range from 21/2 to 81/2 hours. All the first matings of males were fertile and the spermatophores were large, while an increasing proportion of the subsequent matings were infertile and the spermatophores became progressively smaller. Only fertilized females laid normal numbers of eggs. There was no evidence to show that insemination can be accomplished without the transfer of a spermatophore. However, the presence of a spermatophore in the bursa of the female was not always indicative of successful insemination.Males mated only once within a 24-hour period; they were least responsive to females just after emergence (< 0.5 day old) and most responsive when 2 to 4 days old. Females mated most readily when < 0.5 day old and became progressively less attractive or less receptive with age. Mated females were not as attractive as unmated females.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 103 , Issue 8 , August 1971 , pp. 1121 - 1128
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1971

References

Benz, G. 1969. Influence of mating, insemination, and other factors on oögenesis and oviposition in the moth Zeiraphera diniana. J. Insect Physiol. 15: 55–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Butler, C. G. 1967. Insect pheromones. Biol. Rev. 42: 42–87.Google Scholar
Campbell, I. M. 1961. Polygyny in Choristoneura Led. (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Can. Ent. 93: 1160–1162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, I. M. 1962. Reproductive capacity in the genus Choristoneura Led. (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). I: Quantitative inheritance and genes as controllers of rates. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 4: 272–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dustan, G. G. 1964. Mating behaviour of the Oriental fruit moth, Grapholitha molesta (Busck) (Lepidoptera: Olethreutidae). Can. Ent. 96: 1087–1093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gehring, R. D. and Madsen, H. F.. 1963. Some aspects of the mating and oviposition behavior of the codling moth, Carpocapsa pomonella. J. econ. Ent. 56: 140–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, J. A. and Howard, M. G.. 1968. Insemination without spermatophores in the oriental fruit moth, Grapholitha molesta (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Can. Ent. 100: 190–192.Google Scholar
Goodwin, J. A. and Madsen, H. F.. 1964. The mating and oviposition behavior of the navel orangeworm, Paramyelois transitella (Walker). Hilgardia 35: 507–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenbank, D. O. 1963. The analysis of moth survival and dispersal in the unsprayed area. In Morris, R. F. (Ed.), The dynamics of epidemic spruce budworm populations, pp. 87–99. Mem. ent. Soc. Can., No. 31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husseiny, M. M. and Madsen, H. F.. 1964. Sterilization of the navel orangeworm, Paramyelois transitella (Walker), by gamma radiation (Lepidoptera: Phycitidae). Hilgardia 36: 113–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennings, D. T. and Addy, N. D.. 1968. A staining technique for jack-pine budworm egg masses. J. econ. Ent. 61: 1766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMorran, A. 1965. A synthetic diet for the spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Clem.) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Can. Ent. 97: 58–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, M. J. 1933. Contributions towards the study of insect fertility. II: Experiments on the factors influencing fertility in Ephestia kühniella Z. (Lepidoptera, Phycitidae). Proc. zool. Soc. Lond. (Part 4) : 903–934.Google Scholar
Outram, I. 1968. Polyandry in spruce budworm. Can. Dep. Forest. Bi-mon. Res. Notes 24: 6–7.Google Scholar
Outram, I. 1970. Morphology and histology of the reproductive system of the male spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana. Can. Ent. 102: 404–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proverbs, M. D. and Newton, J. R.. 1962. Effect of heat on the fertility of the codling moth, Carpocapsa pomonella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Olethreutidae). Can. Ent. 94: 225–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, S. G. 1953. Reproductive isolation and the integrity of two sympatric species of Choristoneura (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Can. Ent. 85: 141–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, S. G. 1954. A partial breakdown of temporal and ecological isolation between Choristoneura species (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Evolution 8: 206–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stehr, G. 1954. A laboratory method for rearing the spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Clem.), (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Can. Ent. 86: 423–428.Google Scholar
Taylor, O. R. Jr. 1967. Relationship of multiple mating to fertility in Atteva punctella (Lepidoptera: Yponomeutidae). Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 60: 583–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar