Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T14:27:45.488Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

ARTHROPOD COMMUNITIES IN THE CROWNS OF THE NATURAL AND PLANTED STANDS OF PINUS RADIATA (MONTEREY PINE) IN CALIFORNIA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

C. P. Ohmart
Affiliation:
Division of Forest Research, CSIRO, Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia
W. G. Voigt
Affiliation:
Division of Biological Control, University of California, Albany, California 94706, U.S.A.

Abstract

One hundred and ten species of insects together with unidentified spiders and pseudoscorpions were collected in foliage samples of Pinus radiata taken from the three natural mainland populations and two planted populations in California. The diversity of the arthropod community in the crowns of P. radiata D.Don was low with 76% of the total number of individuals accounted for by five species groups and 88% by 11 species groups. Spiders were the most abundant species group, comprising 33% of the total number of individuals. The most abundant insect groups were Homoptera, Hemiptera and Coleoptera, respectively. The natural stands supported more species at higher population levels than the planted stands which supported only two species at very high population levels and the rest at low levels. The arthropod communities at the borders of the natural stands were more diverse than at the centers of the stands. The degree of similarity between the natural stands seemed to reflect their geographic distribution; Ano Nuevo and Monterey were most alike and the differences between Ano Nuevo and Cambria were greater than those between Monterey and Cambria. Differences in insect communities within and between the natural and planted stands are discussed in detail.

Résumé

Cent-dix espèces d’insectes y compris des araignées et pseudoscorpions non-identifiés ont été échantillonnées sur du feuillage de Pinus radiata prélevé dans trois populations continentales naturelles et deux populations plantées en Californie. La diversité de la communauté arthropodienne des couronnes de P. radiata D.Don s’est révélée faible avec 5 groupes spécifiques représentant 76% du nombre total d’individus et 11 groupes spécifiques, 86% du total. Les araignées étaient le groupe spécifique le plus abondant, comprenant plus de 33% du nombre total d’individus. Les groupes d’insectes les plus importants étaient par ordre les homoptères, les hémiptères et les coléoptères. Les peuplements naturels présentaient plus d’espèces dont les niveaux de population étaient plus élevés que les plantations qui n’abritaient que deux espèces à niveaux élevés de populations, et le reste à bas niveaux. Les communautés d’arthropodes aux limites des peuplements naturels étaient plus diversifiées qu’au centre des peuplements. Le degré de similarité entre les peuplements naturels a semblé être le reflet de leur distribution géographique; Ano Nuevo et Monterey étaient les plus semblables et les différences entre Ano Nuevo et Cambria étaient plus grandes qu’entre Monterey et Cambria. Les différences inter- et intra-peuplements naturels et non-naturels concernant la composition de la communauté d’insectes, sont commentées en détail.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dahlsten, D. L., Luck, R. F., Schlinger, E. I., Wenz, J. M., and Copper, W. A.. 1977. Parasitoids and predators of the Douglas-fir tussock moth, Orgyia pseudotsugata (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae), in low to moderate populations in central California. Can. Ent. 109: 727746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forde, M. 1966. Pinus radiata in California. N.Z. Jl For. 11: 2042.Google Scholar
Gilmore, J. W. 1967. Distribution and significance of the needle blight of pine caused by Dothistroma pini in New Zealand. Pl. Dis. Reptr 51: 727730.Google Scholar
Lindsay, A. D. 1932. Report on Monterey pine (Pinus radiata D.Don) in the native habitat. Bull. Commonw. For. Bur. 10. 57 pp.Google Scholar
Madden, J. L. 1975. An analysis of an outbreak of the wood wasp Sirex noctilio. Bull. ent. Res. 65: 491500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayse, M. A. and Price, P. W.. 1977. Seasonal development of soy bean arthropod communities in east central Illinois. Agro-Ecosystems 4: 382405.Google Scholar
Morgan, F. D. 1967. Ips grandicollis in South Australia. Aust. For. 31: 137155.Google Scholar
Mucha, S. 1967. The establishment and spread of Sirex noctilio in Tasmania from 1950 to 1964. Aust. For. Res. 3: 323.Google Scholar
Ohmart, C. P. 1980. Insect pests of Pinus radiata plantations: present and possible future problems. Aust. For. 43(4): 226232.Google Scholar
Ohmart, C. P. 1980. An annotated list of insects associated with Pinus radiata in California. CSIRO Div. For. Res. Div. Rep. (in press).Google Scholar
Pimentel, D. and Wheeler, A. G.. 1973. Species and diversity of arthropods in the alfalfa community. Environ. Ent. 2: 659668.Google Scholar
Root, R. B. 1973. Organization of a plant arthropod association in simple and diverse habitats: The fauna of collards (Brassica oleracea). Ecol. Monogr. 43: 95124.Google Scholar
Southwood, T. R. E. 1978. Ecological Methods. Chapman and Hall, London. 524 pp.Google Scholar
Strong, D. R. Jr., 1979. Biogeographical dynamics of insect-host plant communities. A. Rev. Ent. 24: 89119.Google Scholar