Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T14:35:00.537Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

AN OVIPOSITION MODEL FOR THE SPRUCE BUDWORM, CHORISTONEURA FUMIFERANA (LEPIDOPTERA: TORTRICIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Jacques Régnière
Jacques Régnière
Affiliation:
Canadian Forestry Service, Great Lakes Forest Research Centre, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario P6A 5M7
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A process-oriented model was developed to describe the oviposition of the spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Clem.), on an individual and a population basis. The model simulates the effects of temperature on female longevity, oogenesis, and oviposition. The model is structured for ease of incorporation of additional processes such as emigration, immigration, mating, and other behavioral reductions in oviposition activity. Simulation results, at both the individual and the population levels, are compared with laboratory and field data. This model is an element of a model of spruce budworm biology currently under development but, by itself, can be used to study the effects of temperature and dispersal on the fecundity of spruce budworm populations.

Résumé

Un modèle détaillé a été développé pour décrire l'oviposition de la tordeuse des bourgeons de l'épinette, Choristoneura fumiferana (Clem.), tant au niveau des individus que des populations. Ce modèle simule les effets de la température sur la longévité, l'ovogenèse, et l'oviposition. Le modèle est structuré de façon à faciliter la considération ultérieure de processus additionnels tels l'émigration, l'immigration, l'accouplement, et autres réductions de fécondité dûes au comportement. Les résultats de simulations faites au niveau individuel ou collectif sont comparés à des données appropriées de laboratoire et de terrain. Le modèle est un élément d'un modèle de la biologie de la tordeuse présentement en développement. Cependant, il est jugé utile comme outil dans l'étude de l'effet de la température et de la migration des adultes sur la fécondité des populations de l'insecte.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 115 , Issue 10 , October 1983 , pp. 1371 - 1382
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1983

References

Blais, J. R. 1953. Effects of the destruction of the current year's foliage of balsam fir on the fecundity and habits of flight of the spruce budworm. Can. Ent. 85: 446–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, I. M. 1962. Reproductive capacity in the genus Choristoneura Led. (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). I: Quantitative inheritance and genes as controllers of rates. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 4: 272–288.Google Scholar
Greenbank, D. O. 1956. The role of climate and dispersal in the initiation of outbreaks of the spruce budworm (Choristoneura fumiferana) in New Brunswick. 1. The role of climate. Can. J. Zool. 34: 453–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenbank, D. O. 1957. The role of climate and dispersal in the initiation of outbreaks of the spruce budworm in New Brunswick. 2. The role of dispersal. Can. J. Zool. 35: 385–403.Google Scholar
Greenbank, D. O. 1963. The analysis of moth survival and dispersal in the unsprayed area. In Morris, R. F. (Ed.), The dynamics of epidemic spruce budworm populations. Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 31. 332 pp.Google Scholar
Greenbank, D. O., Schaefer, G. W., and Rainey, R. C.. 1980. Spruce budworm (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) moth flight and dispersal: new understanding from canopy observations, radar, and aircraft. Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 110. 49 pp.Google Scholar
Harvey, G. T. 1977. Mean weight and rearing performance of successive egg clusters of eastern spruce budworm (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Can. Ent. 109: 487–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMorran, A. 1965. A synthetic diet for the spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Clem.) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Can. Ent. 97: 58–62.Google Scholar
Miller, C. A., Greenbank, D. O., and Kettela, E. G.. 1978. Estimated deposition by invading spruce budworm moths (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Can. Ent. 110: 609–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, R. F. (Editor). 1963. The dynamics of epidemic spruce budworm populations. Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 31. 332 pp.Google Scholar
Outram, I. 1971 a. Morphology and histology of the reproductive system of the female spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Can. Ent. 103: 32–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Outram, I. 1971 b. Aspects of mating in the spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Can. Ent. 103: 1121–1128.Google Scholar
Régnière, J. 1982. A process-oriented model of spruce budworm phenology (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Can. Ent. 114: 811–825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Régnière, J., Rabb, R. L., and Stinner, R. E.. 1979. Popillia japonica (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae): a mathematical model of oviposition in heterogeneous agroecosystems. Can. Ent. 111: 1271–1280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Royama, T. Spruce budworm population dynamics: A reanalysis of the Green River Project life tables. Ecol. Monogr. (in press).Google Scholar
Sanders, C. J. and Lucuik, G. S.. 1975. Effects of photoperiod and size on flight activity and oviposition in the eastern spruce budworm (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Can. Ent. 107: 1289–1299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, C. J., Wallace, D. R., and Lucuik, G. S.. 1978. Flight activity of female eastern spruce budworm (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) at constant temperatures in the laboratory. Can. Ent. 110: 627–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, A. W., Borland, S. A., and Greenbank, D. O.. 1980. Field fecundity of the spruce budworm (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) as determined from regression relationships between egg complement, fore wing length, and body weight. Can. J. Zool. 58: 1608–1611.Google Scholar
Wilson, L. F. and Bean, J. L.. 1963. Site of spruce budworm egg masses on their preferred hosts in the Lake States. J. econ. Ent. 56: 574–578.Google Scholar